The Hushed Long-Term Risks of COVID-19 Vaccines

  • The reported side effects from the vaccines include migraines, anaphylaxis, seizures, paralysis and sudden death. Experts believe long-term effects from the gene therapy may include prion diseases such as Alzheimer’s, cancers, kidney diseases and microvascular injuries to the brain, liver and heart
  • Pfizer has been called a “bully” as it leverages the vaccine against demands that countries use sovereign assets to cover legal liabilities, while the U.S. gives vaccine makers complete indemnity against damages
  • Update: How to protect Your Health After the Jab

The New Orleans Archdiocese has warned Catholics that the Johnson & Johnson COVID-19 vaccine is “morally compromised” as the production of the vaccine uses aborted fetal cell lines.1

This is the latest concern in a rising number of challenges linked to the COVID-19 vaccines that were developed under Operation Warp Speed2 to accelerate the development and distribution of a “vaccine.” In less than one year, several drug companies reportedly accomplished what often takes up to 15 years.3

Yet the term “vaccine” associated with the COVID-19 shot is a misnomer as it doesn’t meet the medical or legal definition of a vaccine, as detailed in “COVID-19 mRNA Shots Are Legally Not Vaccines.” 

Rather, it is genetic therapy that comes with a considerable list of potential long-term health concerns, not the least of which is the troubling evidence suggesting some of the mRNA shots may cause prion diseases such as Alzheimer’s and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). Immunologist Dr. Bart Classen writes:4

“Development of new vaccine technology has been plagued with problems in the past. The current RNA-based SARS-CoV-2 vaccines were approved in the US using an emergency order without extensive long-term safety testing. The results indicate that the vaccine RNA has specific sequences that may induce TDP-43 and FUS to fold into their pathologic prion confirmations. 

The enclosed finding as well as additional potential risks lead the author to believe that regulatory approval of the RNA-based vaccines for SARS-CoV-2 was premature and that the vaccine may cause much more harm than benefit.”

Amid the challenges of physical adverse effects from the vaccines, the lack of adequate testing and the underhanded methods in which vaccination may ultimately be made mandatory, many are now faced with the moral dilemma of being injected with genetic material that was grown in aborted fetal cell cultures.5

Aborted Fetal Cell Cultures Used in Vaccine Production

February 27, 2021, the Food and Drug Administration6 announced the authorization of emergency use for the Johnson & Johnson single-dose COVID-19 vaccine. At the same time, the Archdiocese of New Orleans announced that the vaccine is “morally compromised as it uses the abortion-derived cell line in development and production of the vaccine as well as the testing.”7

In addition to their warning that Catholics avoid the Johnson & Johnson vaccine because of its “extensive use of abortion-derived cell lines,”8 the Archdiocese acknowledged that while there:9

“ … was some lab testing that utilized the abortion-derived cell line, the two vaccines currently available from Pfizer and Moderna do not rely on cell lines from abortions in the manufacturing process and therefore can be morally acceptable for Catholics as the connection to abortion is extremely remote.”

There are other clergy members that disagree with using any of the vaccines available for COVID-19 since, as the statement above indicates, abortion-derived cell lines were used in the lab testing.10 However, the Vatican has been aggressively pro-vaccine and approved the use, writing:11

“In this sense, when ethically irreproachable Covid-19 vaccines are not available … it is morally acceptable to receive Covid-19 vaccines that have used cell lines from aborted fetuses in their research and production process.”

The debate within the Catholic Church has a long history, which centers on using HEK293 cells that were harvested from an aborted fetus in the early 1970s.12 The disagreement leaves many within the church without clear guidance from religious leaders.

Semantics and Technicalities Used to ‘Debunk’ the Truth

Much of the confusion about using aborted fetal tissue in testing and production can be summed up in the statement from The Washington Post, which said in an archived version of a March 2, 2021, article, “The cells used now, such as those used in the Johnson & Johnson vaccine, are not from the original fetal tissue.”13 It should also be noted that an updated version14 of the same article deletes this quote without mentioning that the article has been changed.

This is a common mistake that has been perpetuated in the media using general language to describe the process, which is precisely what self-declared fact-checkers use when they rate something false or misleading. As detailed in ”Several COVID-19 Vaccines Are Made Using Aborted Fetal Cells,” the answer lies in the technicalities and not in the general terms. 

There have been several cell lines commonly used in vaccine development that originated from aborted fetuses.15 Six vaccine makers are using at least one of these cell lines in the development of COVID-19 vaccines, including AstraZeneca and Johnson & Johnson.

Fact-checkers label “false” the claims that cell lines from an aborted fetus have been used in the testing and development of the vaccine for several reasons. Some critics of abortion-derived cell lines have claimed that the vaccines contain the cells, and since the vaccines literally do not contain abortion-derived cells, the entire claim is labeled as false. 

In other instances, fact-checkers claim the cell lines are not original, as in the statement from The Washington Post, but rather a clone. While there may indeed be some who are concerned that the cells could be in the vaccine, typically, the moral objection is to the use of aborted fetal cells in medical research and development. 

Whatever the concern, it has become apparent that fact-checkers are trying to dissuade people from having a public conversation about the ethics of using abortion-derived cell lines to produce and test vaccines. 

In fact, fetal cell lines are used during the production of certain vaccines and the claim that the cells are clones of the original is like saying your 20-year-old or 40-year-old body is no longer your body since all the cells are copies of those when you were a baby.

They are, in essence, a clone of the original. However, there is virtually no difference between cells that grow and multiply in a petri dish and those that grow and multiply in your body during your lifetime. If the cells in your body are still you, then the cells in the petri dish are still those of the original aborted fetus. 

Reports of Side Effects Are Rising Rapidly 

Side effects from the mRNA genetic therapies used to create novel “vaccines” are inevitable. The genetic material effectively turns your cells into bioreactors16 that turn out viral proteins to incite an immune response. Historical and preliminary evidence shows there are short and long-term side effects. 

As Judy Mikovits, Ph.D., explains in her interview featured in “How COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ May Destroy the Lives of Millions,” the mRNA is synthetic, which the body sees as “non-self.” This can trigger the production of autoantibodies to attack your own tissues. 

Commonly reported side effects in those who have received the Pfizer and Moderna mRNA vaccines have included symptoms that are suggestive of neurological damage. 

Since the vaccines began being distributed some of the side effects have included severe allergic reactions including anaphylaxis,17,18,19 seizures and convulsions,20,21 persistent headache and migraine,22 paralysis23 and sudden death within hours or days.24,25,26,27

As detailed in “Why COVID Vaccine Testing Is a Farce,” Mikovits predicts a long-term significant uptick in neurological and neurodegenerative diseases, such as psychosis, Parkinson’s, migraines, ALS and sleep disorders. She also believes there will also be a rise in pain syndromes like fibromyalgia, as well as cancers, kidney disease and rheumatoid arthritis, to name a few.

Additionally, Dr. J. Patrick Whelan, a pediatric rheumatologist specializing in multisystem inflammatory syndrome, submitted a public comment28 to the FDA in December 2020, in which he expressed concern that mRNA vaccines have “the potential to cause microvascular injury to the brain, heart, liver and kidneys in ways that were not assessed in safety trials.”

He cited research showing that “the spike protein in brain endothelial cells is associated with formation of microthrombi (clots).” It seems that since no viral RNA has been found in brain endothelium, “viral proteins appear to cause tissue damage without actively replicating virus.”

Governments ‘Held to Ransom’ to Secure Vaccine Deals

Within the U.S., vaccine makers enjoy full indemnity against injuries that happen from the COVID-19 vaccine, or any other pandemic vaccine, under the PREP Act. If you’re injured, you must file a compensation claim with the Countermeasures Injury Compensation Program (CICP).29 This is funded by taxpayers through the Congressional appropriation to the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS). 

Although similar to the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP), the CICP is even less generous than the NVICP when it comes to compensation. You will be responsible for any attorney fees and expert witness fees. 

Another problem is that, like the NVICP, the CICP is administered within the DHHS, which also operates and promotes the COVID-19 vaccination program. This is a significant conflict of interest that makes it less likely the CICP will acknowledge that a COVID-19 vaccine harmed someone.30

However, in many countries outside the U.S., drug manufacturers are not afforded such liability protection. While most governments are offering indemnity to the vaccine manufacturers, there are a fair few who have not. According to The Bureau of Investigative Journalism,31 Pfizer has asked for sovereign assets in Argentina and Brazil to be put up against any future legal costs. 

Officials from Argentina and an unnamed Latin American country, which cannot be revealed as it signed a confidentiality agreement with Pfizer, told a journalist from The Bureau of Investigative Journalism they felt:32

“Pfizer’s demands went beyond those of other vaccine companies, and beyond those of Covax, an organization created to ensure low-income countries can access vaccines, which is also requiring its members to indemnify manufacturers.”

Do Your Own Risk-Benefit Analysis Before Deciding

Before taking the vaccine it’s important to do your own risk-benefit analysis based on your moral beliefs and science. It is crucial to be careful about making up your mind before using experimental gene therapy. 

It is also important to remember that the lethality of COVID-19 is surprisingly low, lower than the flu for those under the age of 60.33 If you’re under the age of 40, your risk of dying is just 0.01%. This means you have a 99.99% chance of surviving the infection, which can improve to 99.999% if you’re metabolically flexible, insulin sensitive and vitamin D replete. 

The mRNA vaccines are not designed to prevent infection and transmission of SARS-CoV-2, only to reduce the severity of the symptoms of COVID-19 disease. In the meantime, you also have the potential of becoming sicker once exposed to the virus, or it may trigger persistent serious side effects such as those reviewed above. 

I urge you to take the time to weigh the potential risks and benefits based on your situation before making a decision you could regret for the rest of your life. Undoubtedly, Pfizer and other vaccine makers suspect this as well, which is why they are asking for indemnification from all governments and are working hard to quash any public debate about the morality or science behind the vaccine.

86 thoughts on “The Hushed Long-Term Risks of COVID-19 Vaccines

  1. Hi there, just wanted to leave my opinion on this great blog you have going!

    Joking. This is such a dangerous website to have at the forefront of google searches on vaccine information, i really really urge you to bonk your head real hard against the wall and read some MEDICAL journals on the topic of the vaccines, and their side effects instead of citing the catholic church’s opinion on the topic (literally no one cares about them anyways?).

    I am educated, and not at the highest rate with a fancy degree, but i can see through this website like a glass window, you clearly don’t even have the ability to read your citations full throughout…

    you make no effort to stay neutral and present facts, it is clearly apparent you are a classic anti vaxxer that rejects reality and accepts the fake one that is most convenient to you.

    Your focus on the companies bullish ways to sell and secure deals….. LOL. You live in America, welcome to capitalism. These are publically traded massive companies that have had MAJOR exposure because of the pandemic… and yes the major part of each company that is owned by stock holders are probably the ones that are pushing for the “best deal”. Again, it’s capitalism.

    Your closing argument on the companies quashing any public debate on the topic…. is so untrue. Yet another claim you make with no proper citation and with clear bias… and your waaay overused and misguiding claim that the flu is more lethal is just so wrong… there are so many factors that involve the lethality and severity of covid, like ANY virus.

    I’m just passionate, and upset that i keep seeing misinformation like this website all over, and people who don’t know any better actually take word for it. You are NOT gaining anything by being on the anti-vax side…. I do not have the effort to cite my knowledge but i urge you to put aside your confirmation bias as much as you can and change the way you research information. How you frame your search query in your research heavily influences what you will come across. I’m sure you know this already. In today’s day and age it is so easy to nitpick info from article to article, use quote after quote from different credential’d doctors to back your claim your side vigorously invested in…

    example: searching for covid-19 long term vaccine side effects OR searching for covid-19 long term side effects debunked

    I urge you to stop looking at the pandemic with such a cynical view… yes companies have benefitted. Pfizer and moderna are at the top, but again. This is capitalism. you live in america. There is always someone or some company profiting off of every world event, good and bad. Does this mean the red cross is responsible for every natural disaster? cause they profit more than 50% of what you donate…

    I’m surprised i haven’t seen purell implicated in any conspiracy theories… but like the topic of misinformation on vaccines – i’m sure if you’re looking for it you can find it.

    – From a user who didn’t like this website and saw right through it. Cheers.

    Liked by 2 people

  2. Thanks for writing. Please look into some of the other posts on the blog. There are over 200 posts now, mostly regarding Covid-19. Every post is fact checked. In an age of denial, I believe folks should have access to the information. They have a right to make up their own minds. If you think this website is dangerous, perhaps the danger is that people will begin to think for themselves.

    Liked by 6 people

  3. I am not anti vaccine. I got my 2nd shingles shot and seasonal flu shot on the same day. I am skipping this experimental medicine. I have two graduate degrees, one in engineering, so I am not an uneducated hick. The long term risks for me do not outweight the benefit. I am on Ivermectin as a preventative. It is actually more effective at preventing transmission than the vaccine. For more information look at the site. It is run by a group of doctors that actually practice medicine and have nothing financial to gain.

    Liked by 2 people

  4. You could possibly be all wrong + he precisely right …. matter of fact I’d bet on him …. but I’m wise to the wicked ways of the world , you obviously not so much


  5. I have included quinine via tonic water drank as well as daily vit (quality) in my diet. Quinine is the natural substance that Hydrochloriquine is a synthetic alternative to. There is 80mg of quinine in 1 liter of tonic. 5 liters drank in a week would be similar to a weekly pill of 400mg of Hydrochloriquine.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. You have a better chance of recovering from COVID19 than the flu, why would anyone in their right mind take an experimental vaccine that is not even FDA approved with a virus that has a 99.5% chance of recovery rate if contracted…..the media and Congress has mind controlled everyone to live in fear, no thanks to your poison that offers a 85% chance of protection but can cause irreversible damages to general health. I trust my god given immune system over big pharma who are protected over any liabilities caused by dangerous experimental vaccines.

    Liked by 2 people

  7. I found this blog extremely enlightening. I struggle to understand why the massive push for all of us to get vaccinated. What is the end game here? What do they gain? In the end, at a 99.97% survival rate for healthy people under 60, it is simply nonsensical to take any medication Let alone one that hasn’t been fully approved.

    Liked by 1 person

  8. There’s a big difference in “educated “ and “intelligent”

    Educated doesn’t mean intelligent. Educated is another word for “indoctrinated” really. Because look what our woke universities are producing 😂

    Look at the “experts” on tv that have nothing to support their insane ideologies except their “education” 😂

    When somebody says “I’m educated so you should listen to me” it tells me you’re an idiot that can’t think for yourself. You had to be TAUGHT how to think like the person that taught you. Because you’re a moron.

    Intelligence trumps education all day every day.

    Liked by 5 people

  9. Could you please point me to your footnotes? They are not showing up directly at the end of the article.


  10. Sources and References
    1, 5, 7, 8, 9 Archdiocese of New Orleans, February 26, 2021
    2 Operation Warp Speed
    3 History of Vaccines, Vaccine Development, Testing and Regulation
    4 Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 2021;5(1):1
    6 FDA, February 27, 2021
    10, 12, 13 Washington Post, March 2, 2021
    11 The Vatican, December 21, 2020
    14 Washington Post (Updated) March 2, 2021
    15 Life Site News June 11, 2020
    16 MIT Technology Review, February 5, 2021
    17 RT, December 26, 2020
    18 The Defender, December 21, 2020
    19 Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, December 19, 2020
    20 Facebook
    21 WION, January 2, 2021
    22 Times of India November 25, 2020 #9
    23 Alanna Tonge-Jelley
    24 Daily Star, December 30, 2020
    25 RT, January 4, 2021
    26 The Defender, January 7, 2021
    27 The Vaccine Reaction, January 24, 2021
    28 University of California Public Comment related to consideration of vaccines against SARS-CoV-2, December 8, 2020 (PDF)
    29 CICP
    30 Anthrax Vaccine, December 4, 2020
    31, 32 The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, February 23, 2021
    33 Annals of Internal Medicine September 2, 2020,

    Liked by 1 person

  11. I find it suspect that the media nor government officials ever give people all of the data regarding these vaccines. They tout that it’s a race to get America vaccinated, but why? We can still transmit the virus and variations after receiving the vaccine. In fact, the vaccines were only intended to reduce minor to moderate symptoms of Covid – not prevent death, etc. Not one media source and definitely not Fauci even breeches the subject of long term effects. It takes an average of 8-12 years for cancers to multiply enough for mere humans to discover them via scans and biopsies after the initiating causative event. Look at 9/11 and the cancers as a result of that one-time exposure to the profit making elements required to construct buildings nowadays. The cancers began to hit about ten years later. So might we see an influx of blood cancers in 5-10 years time because we rushed to approve untested vaccines and decided to ignore future consequences? What about the prion diseases like Alzheimer’s? We’re not supposed to have RNA in our brains, yet look at where mRNA has been found after vaccination. I believe a lot of people get angry at non-vaccinators because they themselves have some doubt and possibly regret and if they are going to suffer, they want all of US to suffer, too. I do not trust big chem, any government, or Fauci. Our best interests are not the same as theirs, which is, above all else, to make as much money as possible in any way possible. Consider Round Up and Mansanto, consider big tobacco, Perdue, etc. PS – cut out the dairy. It causes excessive mucus production in humans due to an inflammatory response, beginning the moment it is placed in our mouths. Especially if you unfortunately get sick with a cold/flu/Covid, the extra mucus is less than helpful. PPS – I find it amusing that people in my family and friend group who would never consider getting a flu shot, and would even argue with me vehemently against getting one, practically RAN to get Covid shots, despite being young and healthy. They trust the new mRNA vaccines over the flu vaccines, which have been around for decades now. I don’t get it, as many were ‘antivaxxers’ until three months ago. I, otoh, have had my tetanus boosters, flu vaccines when traveling during winter, etc. Despite my belief in vaccines being helpful overall, I will not get the mRNA vaccines without long term safety data of 5+ years.

    Liked by 1 person

  12. PPPS – Fauci owns stock in both Moderna and in the lab that released the virus, though he has done his best to hide that fact.

    Moderna and Pfizer have no financial obligation in the case of death, disfigurement, etc as a result of injecting their experimental vaccine. The US government has protected them from liability, which says a lot.

    If you search for information regarding long term side effects of the vaccines, you will only find deflection, but most sources do admit that any long term negative side effects are unknown. They reword it to include words like rare, unexpected, etc., as if to say it’s silly to even think about long term effects. Overall – we can predict the long term effects as well as they can since we have zero knowledge of what will occur five years from now.

    Liked by 3 people

  13. In addition to the lack of testing and doubts on long-term safety, the COVID vaccines are no longer needed. The period of excess deaths ran 48 weeks, from 28 March to 20 February 2021. Announced numbers are inflated, just like always. There is no pandemic any more.

    Liked by 3 people

  14. Obviously you are 100% for the experimental drug which does not deserve to be called a vaccine because it’s not. Never approved properly by the FDA, no long term effects studies done, many people having adverse effects for a virus that is not as lethal as they pretend it is. Talk about looking at both sides I certainly don’t see that in your comments. You take it and when you start having the long term effects that have been documented by MANY scientists already let us know how that works out for you.

    Liked by 3 people

  15. I see your point of view. I do recognize injecting religious or political viewpoints may make some uncomfortable or trigger a knee jerk reaction labeling those who look to spiritual leaders for guidance as irrational or out of touch. I personally would not weigh my choice based on a religious factor. But, I’m not religious. I do however uphold and defend any and all who object due to their own convictions, religious or not. I find it quite sad and borderline disturbing we cannot accept opposing opinions or digest information at face value. Exactly what you accuse this blog of doing, you just did. I strongly hold dear the ability to freely choose our destiny. One’s free choice to receive the covid ‘vaccine’ or not is exactly that…choice.

    I strongly disagree with your characterization this blog is ‘dangerous’, has ulterior motives or is either pro or con covid ‘vaccination’. In my opinion this blog has done quite a good job representing the various aspects, opinions and beliefs of individuals, organizations and institutions. No where in the above did the writers try to persuade or dissuade. It merely provides an insight as to why some may choose not to vaccinate due to religious guidance, conviction or edict. What one does with it is on one’s self.

    Over the past year we have seen how the masses respond to fear. How fear has been used to manipulate, control and stifle the human spirit. Words have meaning. The use of inflammatory language has run amok. A ‘stay at home’ order quickly turned into ‘quarantine’. There happens to be a huge difference between the two. The intention behind the ‘stay at home’ order was to help stagger and reduce the impact on medical resources not to prevent infection. This pandemic quickly and unjustifiably arose to bubonic plague proportions. Quite disturbingly the covid ‘vaccine’ has categorically been misrepresented as a VACCINE. It is NOT a vaccine and we need to stop calling such. Again, in my opinion, an intentional, trusted word choice used to soothe and dispel. To throw those who choose not to receive this injection in with what we have come to know over the years as anti-vaxers is not appropriate.

    Anecdotal evidence is not statistical fact. Your characterization of covid as ‘so much worse than’ the ‘regular’ flu is just not accurate. For some, yes. For the overwhelming majority, absolutely not.

    When determining one’s personal risk factor actual morbidity rate matters, not how many have died. Of course individual health and age should always be considered. Actual statistical fact has been sensationalized and manipulated by media and governments causing the vast majority to not apply critical thinking to their individual situations. If it bleeds, it leads. We would not be glued to our couches, remote in hand otherwise. Much like your simplified capitalism analogy.

    Covid should not be compared to the epidemiology of polio, diphtheria, measles, etc. Prior to vaccines, millions upon millions of Americans were infected every year. The majority were children. This was just a given in life for centuries upon centuries. Covid is not smallpox which had a mortality rate of 30%. Situations such as these need to be put in their proper perspective. Ebola has a 50% mortality rate. Where’s the vaccine push for that?! What about the fact Africa is only 15.2% of the world population, yet holds two thirds, 35 million of the worlds HIV positive. In South Africa 20% of those age 15-49 will be infected with AIDS. The chance you will die from covid in the United States is less than .0002. Really people…we need to pull our proverbial heads out.

    Numbers don’t lie. Maybe this will shock the system. The current population of the USA is 332 millions (332,775,543). Total numbers of covid cases in the USA reported by the CDC is 33,259,537. Total US deaths to date is 596,572. The actual infection/contraction/positive test rate is .017 or 2% of the population. The percentage of those infected in the USA had a death rate of 0.9% to date. So, if you happen to get covid your likelihood of death is LESS than 1%. The reported deaths are still being qualified and the number of true covid deaths drops weekly. As an American, using the hard numbers above, the likelihood you will die from covid is 0.0017 or 0.02%.

    All in all, each individual should weigh their own personal age, health and risk factors against the likelihood of becoming infected and what that means for them. For me, living in Los Angeles county, I’m more likely to perish in a fatal auto accident than complications from covid.

    In closing, I do have to submit the following:

    If this pandemic was managed like any other. If after examination of the actual data. If we were not operating from a position of fear. If we did not see a daily death ticker rolling across the screen. If we approached this as a problem to solve using common sense. I ask, would we be lining up to get a rushed-to-market non-vaccine vaccine with less than a year of clinical trials with a shockingly low number of participants? Would we lining up our children to have an injection which has a frightening mortality among all the animal trials performed? Are you ready to put everything on mRNA technology that has been unable to get approval until covid? At this point that is a fool’s bet based on what we know and don’t know…yet. Vaccines have a 10-15 year human clinical trial prior to coming to market. Any drug going to market undergoes rigorous testing. The threat of class action lawsuit and accountability of big pharma is incentive to ‘get it right’. Capitalism or free markets are NOT the issue here. Ill informed, blind trust in the absence of rigorous debate IS.

    Liked by 7 people

  16. Cathy, exactly! It’s not actually a vaccine. If you care to look at the clinical trials, they are available on the FDA, HHS and Pharmaceutical websites. Pretty sketchy stuff. But information manipulation combined with mass fear is quite the motivation for so many, too many. If nothing else we need to demand the buck stops with our youth. Stand together against mandatory vaccinations for school attendance. Just crazy! Can’t speak for the rest of the world, but the US population has lost their mind. The climate is too Orwellian for me…and I’m no conspiracy nut. Just a freedom loving, liberty hugging citizen with two brain cells to rub together. This whole sheeple mentality has my head exploding. If it walks like a duck…


  17. You have a better chance of recovering from Covid than the flu? I think not. I have cared for many children who had the flu as a school nurse. They all returned to school healthy after a week or so. But I suppose you may know something I don’t.

    I am open to other’s opinions on this vaccine but I agree w one post which raises the concern that people may be scared off from taking a vaccine that may protect them.

    What also concerns me, is the many comments which irrevocably state that this vaccine is dangerous.

    How can you be so sure? First, of all I doubt that you ALL have worked and studied viruses, vaccines, etc. I found one article which I shared w my daughter who is a microbiologist and she poked it full of holes. But it IS possible she is wrong.

    As a health professional, I admit that the more I have learned, the more I feel like I don’t know. Meanwhile, I come across people who have no background in the medical field and will preach their absolute certainty about a disease, etc, to me.
    How about a few more of you who are willing to stand up and say “ I don’t know. I may possibly be wrong.

    God bless all.

    Liked by 1 person

  18. Joyce, Thank you for your well-written post. The Case Fatality Rate for Covid-19 is 0.26% as opposed to an average of 0.20% for the annual flu. In other words, the Covid death toll is 30% more than the regular flu. We were told the CFR would be 3.4%, which is off by a factor of 13. But this was never retracted. We have all had Common human coronaviruses, with upper-respiratory tract illnesses, like the common cold. Most people get infected with one or more of these viruses at some point in their lives.
    There is a lot of ignorance about how the body’s immune response works, yes, even among medics. Speaking for myself I prefer to rely upon my body’s own immune response, and not a spiked-up one. My DNA is sacrosanct.
    The questions raised in this blog are real. No one has studied the new “vaccines,” or their side-effects. The results of the experiment are going to play out on a global scale. Already we have seen more killed since January than the last 15 years of all vaccines combined.


  19. Since getting my second Moderna shot on June 4, I’ve been searching up side effect information. NOT because I have any particular prejudice for or against this vaccine as so many others do on-line, nor do I have any ulterior motives or political feelings about it.
    I started searching solely because of what my body has been feeling since the second vaccine 18 days ago:
    -Fatigue, on a daily basis. It comes and goes but is not getting marginally better nor worse.
    -Low level nausea. Not vomiting, just a lack of desire to eat, and NO desire to drink any alcohol including wine. Before the vaccine, I drank a glass of red wine a night. Now, I cannot tolerate any, it makes me nauseous.
    – dizziness, brain fog. A general feeling of not feeling stable or grounded.
    – wild dreams, never before dreamt like this. it happens every night.
    – mild/moderate stomach pain. Every day, again no desire to eat.
    -Finally, the most disturbing of all. I was given a dose of Epinephrine during a recent skin cancer procedure. I’ve had it before, never experienced issues. This time, my pulse began to race, my fingers started shaking, the doctor said I had irregular rapid heartbeat. I felt dizzy and faint like I was literally going down for the count. Long story short, ended up in the ER. Felt better after a couple hours but was I worried! Again, had Epinephrine before, never felt ANYTHING like that in my life. Why now?

    Liked by 2 people

  20. After 2nd moderna shot I had extreme difficulty breathing, too dizzy to drive for 4 days. Upper abdominal pain, itching slowly got better. On day 9 health food store suggested to take 1/2 tsp milk thistle seed daily for liver detoxification for 7 days. Immediately felt better after milk thistle no more shortness of breath or weakness.



    FYI America’s FrontIine Doctors website was removed by their carrier “amazon” two weeks ago, like FB and Twit, Google etc for censorship. Why? Because they are one of the few resources to actually provide cov19 treatment and preventative care that works.

    Why does fouci, cdc, left media push back so hard against people trying to treat and save their fellow humans so hard? The FDA cannot grant EUA to experimental agents like the Pfizer-BioNTech, Moderna (the two most prominent offenders) IF there are legitimate effective treatment options.

    Medications we’ve used for decades with a great track records are effective treatment. Used “off label” which is legal, HQC+Azithromycn+Zinc; Ivermectin (human grade please not the veterinarian gel used to deworm livestock) or steroid treatment with budesonide or prednisone (In personally familiar with all of them).

    I’ve personally used their assistance twice. And am very greatful for their care and bravery to step up when so many of my local physicians, including my (once thought but no longer believe) intelligent Nephrologist are ignorant of verology and immunology, still following blindly. Yes I’m immunosuppressed organ transplant recipient. I’m also very sad for my fellow immunosuppressed peers who are now suffering and significantly worse under the misguided mrna injection results.


  22. You are welcome to get your information elsewhere. You are obviously “triggered.”

    As detailed in “Why COVID Vaccine Testing Is a Farce,” Mikovits predicts a long-term significant uptick in neurological and neurodegenerative diseases, such as psychosis, Parkinson’s, migraines, ALS and sleep disorders. She also believes there will also be a rise in pain syndromes like fibromyalgia, as well as cancers, kidney disease and rheumatoid arthritis, to name a few.

    Liked by 1 person

  23. Actually the covid 19 vaccine is no like the traditional vaccines, as it is an mRna vaccine. It is gene therapy. Many studies have been done on this well before the emergency order for this vaccine, and the FDA has never approved anything using mRNA. The covid19 vaccine is NOT FDA approved. Noone knows the long term side effects because it is still very new. The side effects the CDC have announced so far are thrombocytopenia and cardiomyopathy. People have died because of these side effects.

    I am educated as well. The fetal cells are in all vaccines. It is a known fact. The CDC states that on their website. Live tissue is required to “grow” the pathogen. It is then extracted to make the vaccine. No matter what live tissue is used, some of it is included with the extraction. Not only that there is heavy metals in all vaccines. It even exceeds the recommended heavy metal intake for children by over ten times the amount. You should read the ebook, 1200 studies on vaccines. It is a variety of studies from the CDC, FDA, and American pediatrics regarding the dangers of vaccines. The links are provided to the original studies by the credible sources.

    Good luck!

    Liked by 3 people

  24. you are really blind about the science. via search engine has all the proof you need. But of course, I believe you already know the truth and are working for the lying dark side to keep up this farce! Nice try but no cigar.


  25. I think you have to consider all aspects before making your decision. They are not anti vaxers. They are merely giving an educated opinion. When the govt & big pharma try so hard to get people to take this jab you have to wonder WHY!!

    Liked by 1 person

  26. People have the right to decide for themselves on whether or not to take this dangerous vaccine. Just because you believe it to be safe, a lot of the worlds population do not agree with you. Everyone has a right to either take this experimental vaccine or not. There are hundreds if not thousands of clinicians who are skeptical of this vaccine. The survival rate for a normal healthy person regardless of age is extremely high, so then why should they infect themselves, knowing that of the potential risks? Makes no sense. I am almost 60 yoa. My risk of survival is 99.998%, and I should put this stuff into my body? Why? This vaccine just lessens the severity of Covid, nothing more. People who were vaccinated still caught the virus. Don’t belittle others because we care of what goes into our bodies.
    P.S. You may also want to check your grammar and punctuation before posting your self thinking information.

    Liked by 5 people

  27. I am not going to comment on this website yet, but will on my experience concerning Covid. I was sick with Covid very shortly before it was in the United States making me believe that it’s been hidden for awhile, aside from that, the sickness made me think I was going to die. Many within my family have taken the vaccination or work in the medical field, my one of my family members is a head medical staff at a hospital and has changed her opinion on the vaccine after seeing the side effects it is causing and one patients death with complete media blackout unlike anything she’s seen. My grandmother, got the vaccine, since then she has a bloody looking rash on her arms and legs that itch and was supposed to be temporary- I can’t remember how long it’s been, but it doesn’t seem temporary even after going to specialists. For anyone trying to share a story about how harmful the vaccine has been in your life, the media, internet, shuts it down quick. I have a few other stories so yeah… – from a anti-vaccine guy who is pro-vaccine choice, pro-voice.

    Liked by 1 person

  28. If the vaccines are safe the pharma companies should shoulder full financial liability in the event of vaccine damage. That they have avoided liability implies THEY do not believe the vaccines are safe.

    Liked by 2 people

  29. The poster doesn’t know any more than someone else from the public knows. His source of information is the media and vaccine propaganda. Unless you’ve got medical credentials there’s no way you can claim this is very good vaccine.

    Time will tell what the long term effects are. Rushed vaccine is a big unknown in my view.

    Liked by 4 people

  30. Joyce, if the Vax was safe it wouldn’t it be approved by the FDA? It has not and many will suffer serious side effect and many have already died.


  31. VACCINES have been proven to be dangerous and there were no double blind studies done on any of these. The same people pushing the VACCINES are the same people with full immunity from them and raking in the $$$ from taxpayers. I work in medicine and this whole pandemic was fixed and manufactured from the start… all the way from the PCR test that does not even isolate the genome of the virus, to the medical facilities getting extra money for positive tests and using ventilators, to hospitals getting Medicare money for keeping empty beds for covid, to the masks that don’t do anything but cause more bacterial infections, to the ridiculous rules made up from these regulatory agencies that do not see what is happening, care at all, and gain big $$$ from keeping people dependent on keeping people sick and stupid. Do your research!!! I have personally seen people die immediately after the vaccine!!! This has been published in VAERS.


  32. My favorite part is how we all know that it only lessons the effects of COVID on the person receiving the vaccine. It kind of works like a flu shot. Me getting it does not prevent it for others. In fact, like the flu shot, I would be guaranteed to be sick if I have it (I haven’t had the flu for years…since I stopped taking the flu vaccine). It does not prevent anyone from getting COVID, and many have obviously gotten COVID after the shot. Doctors will say you must have already been exposed no matter how many numbers pop up. No matter how well you know your body, exposures to people, or how you count days between being in contact, and getting sick. I assure you, many of those people are simply not heard nor reported properly.

    Perhaps if the medical community, and the powers that be, actually were honest and didn’t rely on fear tactics, we may give them the time of day. You know…trust is VERY hard to earn back. There’s a massive difference between what I see and know without a doubt, and what I am told.

    Liked by 1 person

  33. And if this was truly a plague like the bubonic plague or Spanish flu, they wouldn’t need tactics, agendas, or bullying to get us to be vaccinated. Have you watched the death count, like in general with all reasons combined? Death in general has not gone up by much. While death from COVID is real, they wouldn’t have to use fear if it was trying to wipe us out. They should have started and ended with truth, education on the truth, and choice. Fear, agenda, and bullying are not the ways of truth.

    Liked by 1 person

  34. I had many similar issues from the Anthrax vaccine prior to deploying. So did many other female soldiers. Not long after explaining my newfound issues, and beimg told its not the vaccine, they recalled the vaccine. I only found ONE solid article on it so far. Keep pushing and keep documebtation from on medical visits. Keep a journal. I wish I did.


  35. Very well said. Thank you. I have been looking for information because the college my freshman son is going to this fall has just mandated the Covid 19 shot. I would rather have the virus than get this injection.

    Liked by 1 person

  36. Voices of many high level scientists are being “hushed” if they don’t go along with the deep state narrative. These people are not anti-vax. They are against this one which is not truly a vaccination, and very dangerous. Follow the money….those creating and continuing this farce are all profiting either financially or in gaining power. Some of the voices being kept quiet by the complicit media are way more highly credentialed than Fauci and others being listened to on this topic.

    Liked by 1 person

  37. Could you please reference to me one of those “MEDICAL journals on the topic of the vaccines” that can attest to long term effects from these emergency use authorization “vaccines” that literally had only months of application???? You can not, becasue there are none… we do not have long term data. And, I am totally aware of how long the technology has been studied, but also aware that the technology has not been been approved for use prior to now. Why is this??? I am not antivax but I am also not ,at this time, willing to be part of an ongoing clinical trial and prefer to look at my own personal health, risk vs benefit factors, and make an informed decision for myself and myself only. I also want all the information anyone wants to say about it, then I get to decide what I deem misinformation or not based in current scientific data from what we currently know. And while we are learning more and more each day, we still dont know alot. Scince is NOT math, Its hypotesis based on ongoing evidence as it presents and that changes, I don’t want government or some outside source censoring anything under the guise of misinformation based on what someone else deems to be so.

    Liked by 1 person

  38. My grandfather died of a blood clot in his leg. My family has a history of varicose veins. I am 75 years old in very good health except for problems with varicose veins. There is absolutely no way in hell I am going to have a experimental vaccine put into my body to prevent a bad flu like Covid. Yesterday I had a blood test. My blood pressure was 112/62, not bad for an old guy like me.


  39. Thank you for this blog and the numerous replies – it’s good the read . I’m glad others do have enough sense to evaluate the information available . Anyone who insist the shot will help stop the spread and that all should get it are not informed . My research and knowledge to date point in the direction of washing your hands , staying away from sick people and relying on my god given immune system . This reminds me of the cure is worse than the virus comment.


  40. The initial writer, who says this blog is “dangerous” is very likely a paid spokesperson; Monsanto just got exposed for having a team of them, please look it up


  41. I am so sorry for what you are going through, NewPoster! PLEASE be sure to enter this information into the VAERS reporting website. That’s the only place to report adverse reactions to any of the three shots.


  42. I urge you to reconsider how capitalism affects our society and how it urges companies to favor profit over the common good. While some studies have shown that the vaccine reduces Covid infections, other studies have shown adverse affects caused by the vaccine. Perhaps, your comment would be more compelling and credible if it was more unbiased and less opinionated and emotional. An educated person would be open to researching both sides of this topic and make an educated choice based on one’s own due diligence ultimately, being knowledgeable about both sides of this topic. As an educated person with “fancy degrees” I can reassure you, one does not need fancy degrees to be knowledgeable, unbiased, and respectfully provide legitimate counterpoints to a topic they do not agree with. You stated that research can be biased based on how one researches, this is common knowledge or “common sense” at least for us “educated people with or without fancy degrees”. For this reason, everyone is free to research and make decisions at their discretion as this is a “free country”; while you are free to respectfully own your position in this matter and comment freely, so is everyone else. Furthermore, you criticized this article (that provided citations to defend their viewpoints that are clearly stated in the title of the article) while your comment lacked any references to sustain your opinions. What is dangerous to our society are “educated” citizens that attempt to debunk counter viewpoints without any basis to sustain their claims and unwillingness to educate themselves with knowledge on both viewpoints after doing their due diligence to analyze the pros and cons of any topic and yet have the “effort” to write such a comment like yours.

    Liked by 1 person

  43. this, too, is not without long term side effects. Quinine is known to cause loss of hearing when consumed consistently over time from the amounts found only in tonic water…


  44. Excellent article! The only thing I would add is that many vaccines DO actually contain aborted fetal cells, protein, DNA and DNA fragments, according to the CDC excipient list found here: (Accessed June 16, 2021). Presumably, if varicella, MMR, Hep A and others cultured in aborted fetal cells contain these excipients, the J&J and other COVID shots cultured in these media do as well.


  45. I have listened to Dr Malone who developer of the mRNA vaccine and he submitted all his scientific studies and reports to the FDA requesting them NOT to approve his vaccines. So no need to take time to read all the censored virologist who disagree with the narrative – if the maker says dangerous I will thrown my dice with him You can see the interview Dark Horse You-tube Weinstein/Malone


  46. for those employers, schools mandating vaccines here is a one stop shop for all instructions and legal documents and quesitonaires to submit to your employer or school. Bottom line: call your Life Insurance Company and Health Insurance and ask them: if I get the Vax and die, is my policy covered – same with health as to injuries. Some Life and Health will not cover you as their way of getting out of it they state: these vaccines are “experimental” and we do not cover “experimental”


  47. Yes! People need to start thinking for themselves! This shot is not FDA approved, has serious side effects, and covid-19 virus has a very low mortality rate!


  48. This gentleman’s comment is gibberish, misleading and guilty of committing numerous informal fallacies.

    The commenter does not address the data itself, but misdirects individuals to topics which have zero relevance to the matter being considered: for example, he redirects the conversation to “the nature of capitalism and its inevitability within the United States,” which is not relevant.

    After directing attention away from the relevant topic namely, “the potential risks of Covid injections which bypassed FDA approval, utilize a new and untested delivery system (mRNA) – which has been denied FDA approval during the past 15 years in spite of extensive and costly lobbying by numerous Fortune 500 companies,” the emotionally-driven commenter constructs a weak unrelated “straw man argument.”

    According to this admittedly “under educated” fellow, we should blindly accept the significant, real and documented risks of Covid injections because, “a. vaccination conglomerates are driven by profits, an attribute of Capitalism b. Capitalism is an inescapable American institution and c. We live in America… Therefore we should just do as we are told and accept vaccinations as one of the inevitable characteristics of capitalism which is an inevitable characteristic of the United States of America which is where we live.”

    To paraphrase the commenter, “he is guilty of so many errors in reasoning and flaws of logic that I do not have the time to enumerate them all,” but a good start would be just to open up any book on informal logic.

    The commenter also resorts to sophomoric name calling, “Anti-Vaxxer.” First of all, this biased label is routinely applied by anyone who opposes the dissemination of information regarding vaccination pros and cons.

    Secondly, the label is not the least bit applicable to the author of this article. Unless I missed it, the author did not state a position of opposition to ALL vaccinations. The author did not even profess and opposition to the covid vaccination. He merely introduced information regarding the potential risks of receiving the covid vaccination without performing further research. The author then cited several studies and left it up to the reader to decide.

    The author suggested that we, as individuals would be prudent to do our research before blindly allowing ourselves to become test subjects for a vaccination which has caused significant, severe and documented side effects.

    As the normal and proper FDA approval process was bypassed, no one has a clue regarding the potential long-term side effects of the covid injection. Vaccination patent holders stand to earn billions of dollars of profits from the covid injections, with absolutely zero accountability or financial exposure. The commenter admits that vaccination producers are purely profit driven.

    It would be naive in the extreme to think that a purely profit-driven corporate entity would have our best interests at hand. It is more than naive to hold the opinion that “all drug companies are good and never make mistakes,” because such a position is counter to unambiguous, undisputed historical fact: millions of people have suffered severe side effects and loss of life after submitting to the advice, and commonly held opinion that “certain, specific drugs and/or vaccinations ‘are safe.'”

    When in fact, these unsafe treatments pushed upon the public by some of the very same companies now manufacturing the covid vaccinations, proved very dangerous, culminating in a recall and numerous class action lawsuits.

    And, these dreadful mistakes were the result of drugs and or vaccinations which successfully passed mass clinical trials and the complete FDA approval process. Google it and see for yourself.

    The article itself appears to be promoting “pro-information,” not “anti-vaccination.”

    The author suggests that the reader consider the risks of the covid virus itself and weigh these against the risks known, as well as unknown, of the vaccination before making your decision. Prudent advice.

    The author then closes his article with a recommendation to simply do your own research. More prudent advice.

    However the commenter considers the public too stupid to make such a decision for themselves.

    Do you need to be told what to do because you cannot make up your own mind when it comes to possibly irreparable decisions regarding your health care or your children’s healthcare?


  49. I am new to this site, but with all due respect, just go to the CDC VAERS data as current today, which is still likely behind and under reported. Look at the sheer % and numbers of deaths related and adverse reactions to date. Compare it to the seasonal flu data for over two decades and it will give you great pause. They pulled many vaccines back for way less. So, iI think it’s OK to question this, not only short term but long term. Now you are going to be required to get boosters, which will be for how many years since a virus will mutate for quite some time. This technology seems to have more adverse issues, even deaths. Do the math, and then ask yourself why we are at least not getting this information on with everything else. No data, just Shane if you don’t take it?


  50. Thank you for giving many some clarity,and valuable information, instead of harassing,name calling,saying others should “harm” themselves, because we have chosen Not to get the “jabs” of poison our government and the media are trying to force upon us FREE AMERICANS in our FREE COUNTRY!! GOD BLESS🙏🇺🇲


  51. Not only did Webster change the definition of vaccine to include this type of toxic jab and the manufacturers are insisting on “NO LIABILITY” protection? and DO NOT say these facts are untrue because the proof is as plain as day.


  52. but itsnt getting articles from medical professionals with PHDS worth looking at? hmmm you said they are not yet you have gotten your data from somewhere but somehow you think yours is the only logical explanation and from professionals that you deem as correct while these professionals are not, why is that? Why cant there be truth to this dangerouse side of the vaccine? you think that the FDA and the CDC know the future of this vaccine when they can not even explain this virus and they do not even know how to help people? Seems to me you have your side made up and apparently that is the only right explanation.


  53. You say ‘misinformation’ and ‘false’ yet site no facts to back up your claims, followed by the words “conspiracy theory”. That is normally the first resort when one has no facts to back up their rantings.


  54. Mikovits has been totally discredited. Please go check out her background. I would think it difficult to get fired from so many jobs. I would not believe anything she says. She has altered lab results, stolen lab material, been arrested. Not really a good source to quote and she is no longer a researcher.


  55. Commented “I do not have the effort to cite my knowledge”
    Very strange you would be so “Passionate”, but then not have the effort to cite your knowledge! That’s seems to be what most of the so called “fact checkers:, who want to sweep the negative effects of the experimental covid gene therapy drug!
    There is something called personal conscious choice involved here!


  56. All you have to do is go to the cdc VAERS data info updated each Friday. Compare against safe vaccines that had longer trials. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to question this. You may say 12,000 deaths are minor compared to the numbers of shots administered, and that would be tragic! The adverse events numbers are even more tragic. Watch the Data, read the details on some patients recipients. Compare the current numbers to the flu vaccine data of 20 plus years and you might understand the pause. Ask yourself why we aren’t communicating and promoting the therapeutics that have been successfully administered by real practicing Doctors that have treated Covid. Noone is dangerously saying it’s not real or showing a lack of compassion, but facts are facts. Where are the facts countering these facts and data.


  57. I’m very concerned about the virus. It’s a very tough decision to make. I hope it’s not a mandatory requirement in the future. If it is a mandatory requirement to be able to have a job or be able to go places, then it becomes more like a communist government. Welcome to the new world order. With repeated covid shots the risk of future adverse health problems increases. The shots are created for profit, not health. I don’t think a few covid shots are going to harm (but I don’t know for sure). The problem I see is that the virus could actually become more deadly because of the shots, because they WILL mutate and become even more resistant and contagious. The surviving virus could be much worse.


  58. The famous musician Eric Clapton took the Astrazeneca vaccine, and he now claims that it gave him a form of arthritis that destroyed his ability to play the guitar. I always wondered why the Astrazenica vaccine was banned in the United States.


  59. From The Herald, 18 May 2021: Among issues that AstraZeneca would have had to address are indications that the vaccine was linked to rare blood clots, particularly in younger people. The India government on Monday said it identified 26 potential cases of bleeding and blood clotting due to the administration of the vaccine. Several countries recommended that the vaccine only be given only to older people because of the link to the rare clots – known as CVSTs (cerebral venous sinus thrombosis). Last month the UK’s Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI), which advises how vaccines should be used, recommended healthy people under 30 be offered a different vaccine.


  60. Yep. This is basically exactly my opinion if I had about an hour and a half to write it. So thanks for that. Though i’ll add that for older people 65+ who the virus is much more deadly for since they usually have health problems, the vaccine does make sense. Even if the vaccine does have long term effects, you’re 65…how long are you expecting to live already. Better to risk it than the Covid death rates. But that’s just my opinion.

    Liked by 1 person

  61. Contributing to this thread:
    Inventor of mRNA Vaccine Warns Against the COVID Shot ……
    Dr. Robert Malone invented the mRNA technology, which has been used to create the Pfizer and Moderna COVID vaccines. He has been speaking out about the dangers of the COVID shot, such as the damages the Coronavirus spike protein causes in the body. In this interview with Del Bigtree, Dr. Robert Malone calls for a stop of COVID vaccines.
    Anyone who dismisses the rRNA creator … deserves what they have coming.


  62. Hi all from the UK

    I used to think vaccines were of some use before I researched properly last year. I changed my mind.

    I put my research on my website. All vaccines are pointless, Utterly pointless except for making money for big pharma etc.The fraud is colossal,and that is just the tip of the iceberg!

    Why play Russian roulette with your body unless you are mad? My vaccines link below. Any queries do ask.

    Kind regards



  63. It’s not that we don’t have larger sample groups available to include in the studies — The problem is that those doing the studies are not collecting and using the data available, and/or, they are not awaiting a large enough sample group to provide the data needed for a significant study. They want the early results precisely because it can then be labeled spurious results and insignificant… Not only that, but the FDA is eager to “approve” jabs long before large enough sample group data has even been looked at in these studies. We need more data, sure, but we also need to be sure the data is not being shuffled into the Top Secret file and we need to make sure the sample groups are not being deliberately kept small so that the studies can claim “Oh, this is just a mere discrepancy, a fluke in our small sample groups, due to our very limited study.” This is deliberate obfuscation, in my opinion, not an “honest lack of data” or some such problem. Sign me, “Suspicious of Big Pharma and the Depopulation Experts”


Comments are closed.