Category: Bill Gates

Depopulation Agenda and the Vax

  • “Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda,” produced by Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Children’s Health Defense, details the World Health Organization’s intentions to produce an anti-fertility vaccine in response to perceived overpopulation, and how such vaccines have been used — without people’s knowledge or consent — since the mid-’90s
  • The WHO has been caught more than once deliberately deceiving women into thinking they were vaccinated against tetanus, when in fact they were being sterilized
  • The film clearly illustrates the depopulation agenda is not a conspiracy theory. It’s reality, and it’s happening worldwide. The HPV vaccine and the COVID shots also have adverse impacts on fertility that are being ignored
  • In the decade after the rollout of the HPV vaccine, the teen pregnancy rate dropped by 50%
  • While VAERS is the only publicly available system to assess COVID jab injuries, the U.S. government has at least 10 other reporting systems they’re not sharing data from. Children’s Health Defense is filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for the other systems to get a better idea of the scale of harms, but VAERS and anecdotal reports alone suggest the scale of injuries and deaths is enormous. Data from insurance companies around the world also confirm this

In the interview above, Dr. Andrew Wakefield and Mary Holland, president and chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense, discuss their new documentary film, “Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda,” which we published yesterday. If you missed it, you can watch it here.

“Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda” is Wakefield’s fourth film. The first was “Who Killed Alex Spourdalakis?” followed by “Vaxxed” and “1986: The Act.” This latest film details the World Health Organization’s intentions to produce an anti-fertility vaccine in response to perceived overpopulation, and how such vaccines have been used without people’s knowledge or consent since the mid-’90s.

“It’s a very important story, and it’s a story that I’d been aware of for some years,” Wakefield says. “I think a lot of people heard about this intentional infertility vaccine program being conducted, primarily in women in developing countries such as Africa. But it had gone into abeyance so I hadn’t paid due attention. 

I should have paid more attention to it, because people had asked me over the years, ‘Do you think there is a population control agenda?’ …

The allegation had been that the World Health Organization, under the guise of a neonatal tetanus prevention program, had been deliberately sterilizing women [in Kenya] — either using a vaccine to abort existing pregnancies or to prevent future pregnancies. They had done this under the guise of protecting children rather than actually reducing the population.”

As explained by Wakefield, it was no secret that the WHO had been working on an anti-fertility vaccine since the 1970s.1 Papers were published, and the WHO itself even admitted it. The real issue here is that of informed consent. The WHO has been caught more than once deliberately deceiving women into thinking they were vaccinated against tetanus, when in fact they were being sterilized. This is an ethical and moral low that is hard to beat.

Covert Sterilization Campaign in the Philippines Revealed

The story detailed in this film begins in 1995, when the Kenyan government launched a WHO vaccination campaign against tetanus among women of childbearing age. Dr. Stephen K. Karanja, former chairman of the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, became suspicious of the program when he learned that involuntary sterilization programs posing as tetanus programs had occurred.

That same year, 1995, the Catholic Women’s League of the Philippines actually won a court order halting a UNICEF tetanus program that was using tetanus vaccine laced with hCG. Anti-hCG-laced vaccines had also been found in at least four other countries.

This anti-hCG-laced tetanus vaccine perfectly matched the anti-fertility vaccine the WHO had announced in 1993. The paper trail reveals that by 1976, WHO researchers had successfully conjugated, meaning combined or attached, human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) onto tetanus toxoid, used in the tetanus vaccine. As a result, when given to a woman, she develops antibodies against both tetanus and hCG.

HCG is a hormone that is produced as soon as the sperm enters the egg and the embryo begins to form. In response to this signal, the woman’s ovaries then produce progesterone, which maintains the pregnancy to term. The conjugated vaccine effectively ends and prevents pregnancy as her own immune system will immediately attack and destroy the hCG as soon as it forms.

At the time, Karanja, who passed away in 2021, convinced leaders of the Catholic Church — one of the largest health care providers in Kenya — to test the tetanus vaccine being given, to make sure there was no foul play. Without explanation, the WHO abandoned the 1995 campaign, but in 2014, they were back with a neonatal tetanus program.

A Diabolical Agenda

Girls and women, 15 to 49 years of age, were instructed to get vaccinated with a series of five injections, six months apart. Suspiciously, this is the exact schedule required for the anti-fertility vaccine to produce sterility. Regular tetanus prevention requires only one injection every five to 10 years, and under no circumstance would you need five of them.

The Catholic Church decided to test the vaccines and collected three sample vials directly from clinics during the 2014 campaign. The samples were tested by three independent laboratories and, as feared, they contained hCG. Another six vials were then collected and tested. This time, half were found to contain hCG.

When the Catholic Church went public with the findings, urging girls and women to not comply with the vaccination campaign, the Kenyan government went on the defensive, insisting there was nothing wrong with the vaccine. Wakefield says:

“They used the media to demonize the Catholic Church and insinuate there had been deliberate contamination of these samples with hCG to produce the result they wanted. 

That’s where it remained until — and this is where it gets really interesting and where the film really comes into its own — our cameras were invited back into the laboratory where these tests were done … [and] the truth was revealed.

It came down to a resolution of this key question of who was lying and who was being honest? Who was cheating, who was not? It’s really an extraordinary story that woke me up to the importance of this issue. There is an extraordinary prophetic statement at the end from the late Dr. Karanja, OBGYN from Africa. who was at the heart of all of this. 

He said, ‘When they are finished with Africa they’re coming for you’ … That’s probably a pertinent place to hand over to Mary, because never could a prophecy have been more apt, more true.”

Depopulation Agenda Is Now a Conspiracy Fact

Holland continues:

“It’s been very hard to answer … when people would ask us, ‘Is there a depopulation agenda?’ People would point to things Bill Gates said, like how vaccines would reduce the population. There was an interpretation that it was going to make people healthier, and therefore they would choose not to have more children. 

It was murky. I think this film really helps us understand that this is not a conspiracy theory. It’s an absolute reality … The film makes that 100% clear. There’s just no question about it. And you see the deceit and deception. Just to point out, the Rome statute for the International Criminal Court that most countries of the world have signed onto … makes forced sterilization a war crime. 

This is not a trivial thing, to deprive people of informed consent and to sterilize them. That’s exactly what happened. One of the interviews in the film that is so poignant is of a woman who cannot carry a pregnancy to term. She comes to realize that she has antibodies to hCG, and she realizes that somebody, somewhere, made her infertile. It is, as she calls it, a diabolical agenda … 

We can now look back at what happened with the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, which I co-wrote a book about in 2018. One of the things we saw was that … the teen pregnancy rate dropped 50% from 2007 to 2018 — 50%! Now, whatever one wants to think about unplanned pregnancies, that is a staggering drop over 10 years. 

People were reporting extreme reproductive effects from the HPV vaccine. Now we’re hearing the same thing, only much more so, with respect to COVID shots. We’re hearing that women are having miscarriages, babies are literally dying from breastfeeding mothers who have been recently vaccinated.

Congenital deformities are being reported to the vaccine adverse event reporting system (VAERS). It’s now, I think, beyond the realm of conspiracy theory to say it is very plausible that these vaccines that are being pushed on the world — particularly the COVID shots — have strong anti-fertility effects.”

Is There Such a Thing as Vaccine Safety? 

It’s important to realize that no study has ever proven that any of the vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule are safe, especially when given in various combinations. As noted by Wakefield, vaccine manufacturers and people like Dr. Anthony Fauci present “an almost kindergarten-like approach” to safety.

The blanket statement given is that vaccines in general, and the COVID shots in particular, are “safe and effective,” and that they have no adverse effects on reproduction and fertility. This, despite the fact they’ve done no reproductive studies at all.

Women who hear such assurances will assume the necessary studies HAVE been done when, in fact, that’s a complete lie. The reality is, you cannot find evidence of harm if you’re not looking for it. Another reality is that assumptions and guesses about science are not the same as scientific evidence. One major assumption that has now turned out to be completely wrong is that the mRNA injection stays in the deltoid muscle, the site of injection.

“No one has ever sought to determine whether they remain at the site of injection or not, or whether they disseminate throughout the body, which of course they do,” Wakefield says. “So, it’s a naive and completely inappropriate assumption.

The other assumption that was completely inappropriate was making any assumption at all. You’re going to give this [shot] to seven billion people … and you’re going to assume something about its safety? Then you discover, after giving it to the majority of that seven billion population, that you were completely wrong. 

In fact, it goes throughout the body. The spike protein can be found in tissues throughout the body, including and in particular in the ovaries. There it can set up an inflammatory reaction, autoimmunity, damage and infertility. There is no question that is biologically plausible. 

So here you have the mentality of these people, that after the horse has bolted, they are trying to shut the gate. If there is going to be damage, then the damage is done and it is too late. That is totally irresponsible and people need to know that.”

Wakefield further points out that no clinical trial for any of the vaccines on the childhood vaccination schedule has ever been tested against a true placebo. All have used active placebos, such as an aluminum injection or another vaccine, which effectively hides most of the adverse effects.

Interestingly, in some of the COVID jab trials, they actually used a completely inert placebo (although some vaccine makers used another vaccine). But then note what happened. Before the trial was over, they unblinded everyone and offered the jab to everyone in the placebo group, effectively eradicating the control group altogether! Then, they tried to bury the data under red tape for 75 years. Thankfully, a sensible judge didn’t let them get away with it. Wakefield says:

“They [Pfizer] knew there were problems. They had identified the problems doing the appropriate study, at least to start with, until they gave the crossover group the vaccine. Then they tried to hide the data because they knew it revealed the seriousness of the adverse reactions to their vaccine. The court overruled them and now those data are being analyzed, and they are terrifying.”

Stunning Abdication of Science

What’s worse, government has incentivized ignorance under the law. They have incentivized not knowing what the long-term effects are. Holland adds:

“What’s particularly stunning, in terms of the absolute abdication from science, is that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has said it’s perfectly fine to co-administer the COVID shots with everything else on the childhood schedule. That is going to have untold horrific likely effects …

Most pediatricians will say ‘Hey, the CDC says it’s fine’ … They are going to be co-administering these shots with other things, and there is no science to back that up. None.”

Unfortunately, the future looks grim in this regard, as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration is now considering a “Future Framework” in which vaccine makers will be allowed to reformulate and release future COVID shots without any additional testing. Clinical trials are easy to rig to begin with, but now they won’t even have to go through the trouble of fabricating desired results.

“And, of course there will be harmful effects on fertility,” Holland says. “I think it’s becoming very clear that we just have to reject all of this. It is corrupted to its core. It’s anti-human, I mean it’s truly anti-human. I think the reality that we’re in is becoming clearer.”

A Hopeful Note

Wakefield adds:

“To follow-up on that, a note of hope … People coming to this anew may think that we’re in a terribly dark time. I see it differently, having been in this now for 30 years. When I started out, a handful of people around the world were prepared to debate the thorny issue of vaccine safety. 

Now I read the other day that 70% of American adults have rejected the CDC’s recommended protocol for the COVID vaccine. They either didn’t get the first dose, they didn’t get the second dose, or they have refused to get the boosters, saying this is neither necessary nor is it safe. 

Those people — 70% of American adults — according to mainstream media are anti-vaxxers. So, whether they know it or not, they’ve joined our team and the other side has lost.

This is a desperate, desperate measure; one hail Mary pass after another, and it’s failing very, very badly. For those of you who have not seen it from an historical perspective, take heart, because the world really is waking up in an extraordinary way …

The silver lining of the dark cloud of COVID is that it has woken so many people … There is an inevitability to what is happening here, and they will not get away with it for very much longer.”

We’ve Allowed the Creation of an Anti-Human World

As for those who insist they have no objections to childhood vaccines, only the COVID jab, Wakefield warns just about every vaccine safety advocate began by objecting to a single vaccine or single ingredient before realizing it isn’t that simple:

“We all came to the collective realization that this was far more complex than we had previously imagined. They were making it more and more complex by the year, adding more vaccines into the schedule, lumping them all together. As Mary said, the idea of these vaccines being safe in combination was one they’d never tested but merely assumed to be safe … 

We came to the realization that it is some cumulative toxicity, some interactive effect, some potentiation that is leading to this massive increase in, for example, neurodevelopmental or immunological disorders. 

Had we been allowed to continue the research, any of us, all of us, we would have answers now. But we don’t have answers because the work was sabotaged at every turn, and now we are living in a state of greater ignorance than we were before. 

We’re now living in a world of man-made diseases. It’s absolutely staggering. None of this need ever have happened, and yet here we are with all of these new conditions or new variants on an old theme, like regressive autism, that we did not see before. That is something that man has created. 

Just as easily man could get rid of it if we took the initiative. That’s what, collectively, we have to do, and that’s what Children’s Health Defense is doing. They’re alerting people to this, waking them up, and it’s working.”

In addition to learning about the dangers of vaccines, people are also starting to learn more about other environmental toxins — pesticides, genetically modified organisms (GMOs), air pollution, water pollution, artificial foods, hormone-mimicking plastic chemicals and more, all of which have adverse effects on health and reproductive capacity.

“I think most humans want to live in a pro-human environment,” Holland says. “And I think the corporate government world we’re in right now is genuinely anti-human.”

The Scale of Harm Is Staggering

While VAERS is the only publicly available database collecting adverse vaccine reactions, the U.S. government has at least 10 other adverse event reporting systems that they’re not sharing data from.

Children’s Health Defense is filing Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests for the other systems to get a better idea of the scale of harms, but VAERS and anecdotal reports alone suggest the scale of injuries and deaths is enormous. Data from insurance companies around the world also confirm this. Holland notes:

“In 2021, from one life insurance company in the United States, an Indiana company, we know that 18 to 64 year olds suffer a 40% excess death rate. They said a 10% shift would be a 1 in 200-year occurrence. A 40% shift is beyond catastrophic, and that’s what we’re looking at. These are secrets that can’t be hidden.”

Panafrican Congress Is Pushing Back

Another piece of positive news is that a Panafrican Congress that was recently convened is starting to push back against the WHO. And, if the WHO were to be banned from a continent like Africa, it would be game over for them. Holland explains:

“The WHO is following a two-track course to get to what they say, in 2024, will be a new international treaty, which basically will put the WHO at the center of global health and governance de facto. One track was through U.S.-proposed international health regulations. 

The U.S. proposed 12 regulations in December 2021 that would put the WHO at the center of these things and put in place very draconian regulations that would allow the WHO to supersede any decisions at the national government level. In a vote on those new international health regulation amendments, 47 African countries rejected all of them. 

Africa really led the way in saying ‘No, we don’t trust the WHO, we don’t want the WHO in this role.’ That’s very exciting because Africa absolutely has been exploited in every which way by the WHO and their pharmaceutical industry partners. I don’t think the WHO agenda is dead. We still have a lot of work to do. 

But clearly, we did have on Saturday an African sovereignty coalition launch, which you can see on the Children’s Health Defense TV website. There were activists, advocates, physicians, scientists from all over Africa, and then supporters from around the world. It’s very exciting. I think Africa is sending a message loud and clear we will not put up with this …

We’ll take it one day at a time, but I believe the WHO and its backers will fail, and certainly many people around the world, Children’s Health Defense included, are working on lawsuits to prove there’s fraud going on here, this is criminal activity. Certainly, the authorization for [young] children [is a criminal act]. 

We’re going to amend the lawsuit we have, which is to contest the jabs for 5 to 11-year-olds that the FDA authorized. We’ll just amend that for these younger children. This is devastating, this is a crime against humanity. There is no justification for young children getting these shots. They are not at risk of serious injury or death from COVID, but they certainly are at risk from these shots.”

Can the Judicial System Be Trusted? 

Speaking of lawsuits, many legal actions over the past two years have failed, but Holland, who is the chief legal counsel for Children’s Health Defense, is optimistic, because courts tend to shift with public opinion. She’s noticed courts are becoming increasingly receptive to the notion that there may be fraud going on with the COVID jabs, and that conflicts of interest play a role.

For example, two judges in New York who were assigned to cases she was representing were recently forced to recuse themselves, after it became known they owned between $50,000 and $500,000 in Pfizer stock.

“I think we’re likely to see many more successful lawsuits going forward in the next two years than in the last two years,” she says. “I think the population is coming to understand that there are conflicts of interest that prevent these people from being unbiased. 

I think it’s a question of time, and I think we’re in a race against time, but I do believe that lawsuits are likely to be more successful as time goes on and I think we’re already seeing that. We struck down the OSHA mandate, we struck down the mask mandates in airline transportation, we got access to the Pfizer documents. I think there’s more good news coming from the courts, I really do.”

The home run, judicially speaking, would be if we could prove vaccine makers committed fraud or “willful misconduct,” as that would eliminate all of their protections against prosecution and liability. The COVID jabs are authorized for emergency use under the 2005 PREP Act — which Holland believes is unconstitutional — and under that law, willful misconduct must be proven by “clear and convincing evidence.”

“I believe that at this point we’re getting very, very close to that threshold where we can prove willful misconduct by clear and convincing evidence,” she says.

“At that point, I think it will be clear to the whole population that it’s the liability protection on the back end and the mandates at the front end that makes this whole enterprise possible. I think there are serious attacks on both of those, and by the time the whole truth comes out, the whole vaccine paradigm disappears.

I think it’s in our sights, I really do. I think the health of the unvaccinated is overwhelmingly superior to the health of the vaccinated, and that story’s coming out. Children’s Health Defense is coming out with a book this fall by Dr. Brian Hooker and Robert F. Kennedy Jr., about the science showing how much healthier unvaccinated people are. 

I think the truth is coming out, and I think the stakes are very high for the next couple years. But I really do believe that at the end of these couple years we will be in a whole new paradigm of vaccines and health. People have seen enough about the bad side of COVID shots that they are now open to this. I think we’re likely to see a sea change.”

In closing, if you didn’t watch the film yesterday, set aside 30 minutes to do it now. And, be sure to watch it all the way to the end. The final 10 minutes include an update on the Kenya story, a review of what happened with the HPV vaccine, and an overview of what we know about the COVID shots’ potential impacts on fertility. It’s important to realize that this depopulation agenda didn’t begin and end in Kenya. It’s happening worldwide.

More Movies Are Coming 

Wakefield’s fifth film is already in preproduction and should be ready for release next year. This one will be a full-length narrative feature about the childhood vaccination schedule. It was co-written by Terry Rossio, who also wrote “Shrek,” “Pirates of the Caribbean,” “Aladdin” and other well-known movie productions. 

“It’s a very powerful film, it will really move the mindset,” Wakefield says. “It will take those who have been awoken by the issue of COVID vaccines across the bridge from the adult vaccine schedule to the realization that this has been happening in the childhood vaccine schedule since the very beginning. It’s a very, very important film.”

Children’s Health Defense will also be coming out with a film version of Robert F. Kennedy Jr.’s book, “The Real Anthony Fauci.” That will be coming out later this year for which I was interviewed.

Source: Accessed 10 Jul 2022

– Sources and References

Bill Gates and the Frame Game

The Brownstone Institute reports on what appears to be an admission at the Davos, Switzerland world elite gathering recently by vaccine profiteer Bill Gates that the experimental COVID “vaccines” don’t work to stop transmission and that vaccine passports are not viable. “In the course of a 56-minute panel discussion the vaccine pusher [Gates] extraordinaire admitted (starting at the 18:22 mark) that the COVID vaccines do not block infection and that the duration of whatever protection they bring to the table is extremely short… He later talked (starting at 51:00 mark) of the absurdity of implementing any COVID passport program—and one can logically deduce any other measure to segregate the vaccinated from the unvaccinated—when the injections have shown no ability to do the least that one should expect from a vaccine: prevent infection and transmission.

These admissions violently kick the stool out from under the arguments made in favor of the more assaultive and damaging COVID ‘containment measures’ taken in the past two years, many of which are still being pursued with pitiless vigor by public officials, CEOs, and educational ‘leaders’ all around the world.

Are we to believe that Bill Gates had a sudden impulse to undermine all that he used his billions to mercilessly promote over the last two years? And that he was giving all those currently carrying out those plans permission to stand down?

It’s a nice thought. But I don’t believe it to be the case.

No. Bill was simply engaging in one of the more tried and true techniques of elite information management, the limited hangout, or what I prefer to call a drive to ‘save the frame’ of an argument that is quickly taking on water.

Since Bill and many of the people he has paired up with to force the experimental and often harmful vaccines upon the world, effectively own or have donated untold amounts of money to many of the world’s more important media outlets, he knew beforehand that he did not have to worry much about his words being widely circulated.

And so it was. Only relatively small independent news gatherers took any note of what he said. He was speaking to the fellow true believers and providing them with a rhetorical model for handling the loss of faith some among their ranks are having in the face of the vaccines’ abject failure.

The key to understanding the frame game here is the clause Gates uttered right before the ‘but’ with which he introduced his truthful words about the ‘vaccines’ pitiful infection-blocking capabilities and short duration of effectiveness: ‘The vaccines have saved millions of lives.’

Those familiar with the work of cognitive linguist George Lakoff, or the activities of pollster and so-called political wordsmith Frank Luntz will know what I’m talking about. 

What these two men have in common—despite their divergent political allegiances—is their belief in the extraordinary power of rhetorical framing; that is, the tendency of the human brain to subordinate the careful analysis of empirically proven details to the embrace of an overarching cognitive metaphor that appeals to their deeper, if often unstated, cultural and emotional values. 

It’s the difference between, for example: “The US invaded Iraq on false pretenses and destroyed it, killing hundreds of thousands of innocent people.” and “In its efforts to bring democracy to Iraq, the US made a number of tragic mistakes.” 

The first states a bald empirical truth. The second obfuscates that crude reality and subordinates it to the noble vision, so cherished by Americans when contemplating their role in the world, of a country that is constantly helping people around the world to better their lives. 

And with widespread imposition of mental frames like this through the media, “poof!” go all the gory, on-the-ground details, and with them more importantly, the need to actually interrogate what we did and how we might seek to repair the lives we broke. 

Going back to Davos, Bill was effectively saying to his minions, “You are on a great moral crusade. We’ve had some small problems along the way, but don’t give up, because the world needs us to continue to be heroic and save more lives.” 

And with that cognitive frame in place, any creeping doubts those in the audience might have about what they have done, and their future mission, disappear just like that.

We see the same gambit used when the US government inevitably links the apparent waning of the pandemic to the use of vaccines. Here, for example, is what the CDC said to CNN shortly after lifting requirement that US citizens be tested before returning home from foreign travels: 

“The Covid-19 pandemic has now shifted to a new phase, due to the widespread uptake of highly effective Covid-19 vaccines, the availability of effective therapeutics, and the accrual of high rates of vaccine-and infection-induced immunity at the population level in the United States. Each of these measures has contributed to lower risk of severe disease and death across the United States.”

It’s no accident that the first factor adduced to explain the onset of happier days, the one that sets the frame for all that follows, is the “widespread uptake of highly effective Covid-19 vaccines.” 

The goal here— as it was in the case of Gates at Davos—is to preserve, in the face of abundant empirical evidence to the contrary, the frame that presents the forced administration of vaccines as the great slayer of the pandemic and gifter of our vanquished freedoms, and to turn that suggestion into an established fact through constant repetition. 

But, of course, neither Gates’s claim about the vaccines saving “millions of lives” nor the CDCs’ assertion that “widespread vaccine uptake” was the key reason for ending the pandemic are established facts. Far from it. Indeed, there are no scientific studies that l know of capable of authenticating either claim. But that’s just the point. 

The elites that deign to rob us of our bodily sovereignty and so much more in the name of Covid, or whatever other “mortal health threat” that they choose to publicize next through their carpet-bomber control of most media, have all done their homework on the frame game and carefully tailor their communications to fit with its imperatives. 

Unfortunately, most citizens are still not clued in to how it operates in their lives. Verbal details such as the ones cited above matter because they play an enormous role in establishing and maintaining what the now sadly tarnished Chomsky once brilliantly called the field of “thinkable thought” in our public discussions. 
To open up that field we need to smash their frames. But to smash those frames we first need to admit they exist, and where we can go to find them.

Source: Organic Consumers Association via

Breaking: WHO Behind FDA Scheme to Skip All Future Clinical Trials for COVID Vaccines

The “Future Framework” is coming from the World Health Organization, and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest voluntary contributor to the WHO, so Gates is likely directing the play.

Editor’s note: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) tomorrow, June 28, will vote on the “Future Framework,” a scheme that would allow Pfizer and Moderna to “reformulate” COVID-19 mRNA vaccines in perpetuity, without conducting clinical trials on the new vaccines. Click here to tell the FDA to vote no on the “Future Framework.”

Introduction: The FDA always rigs the game on behalf of Pharma

Late Friday afternoon, the FDA released its agenda for the Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) meeting that will vote on the Orwellian “Future Framework” on Tuesday, June 28.

Then on Saturday morning, the FDA released a briefing document in connection with this scheme to end science as we know it in connection with future COVID-19 shots. (Much appreciation to the brilliant James Roguski for alerting me to these documents.)

In this article, I will explain what is in the briefing document, what is likely to happen at the meeting and what can be done about it.

The FDA’s ‘Future Framework’ briefing document

The briefing document is 18 pages of text, 1.5 line spacing, with just 19 references — 9 of which are pre-prints or from the CDC’s in-house newsletter Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) which means they are not peer-reviewed.

Any true believer in The Narrative(TM) could have written this in a few hours. To base the entire future of COVID-19 shots on this glorified undergrad term paper is madness.

As I predicted, even though the April 6 meeting was presented as an exploratory initial conversation that reached no conclusions whatsoever, the “Future Framework” is now being presented by the FDA as a done deal, fait accompli, you’d have to be crazy to insist on proper safety studies.

The core argument of the briefing document is hilarious (or rather, it would be hilarious if it was not a plan to permanently institutional genocide and hide the evidence). In several places the FDA argues (colloquialisms mine):

1. These COVID-19 shots work great, miracles really, incredibly effective, boy howdy do they work well! Boosters too, total home run, the Israelis even have 10-weeks of data showing that they might help old people. What more evidence could you want?

2. Okay, well, it depends on what you mean by work. These shots do not stop infection, transmission, hospitalization, or death, even though that’s why we licensed them. Any protection wears off fairly quickly, but It’s Not Our Fault(TM) because This Wily Virus(TM) mutates too fast and no one told us that it would ever mutate.

3. So these shots must be reformulated but we cannot possibly ask Lord Pharma to do proper clinical trials ever again because we already know that these shots work great (see point #1)!

The briefing document literally states:

“The evaluation of modified vaccines for the purpose of vaccine strain composition decisions will need to rely mainly on comparative immunogenicity data due to the time constraints involved in vaccine manufacturing and clinical efficacy evaluation.”

Did you catch that? The evaluation “will need to rely on” (no decision to be made here) measures other than actual health outcomes because of “time constraints.”

Ah, $cience!

Moderna, Pfizer and Novavax are all developing reformulated COVID-19 shots. But they know that the FDA is not going to look at health outcomes so they are going to great lengths to jack up the antibody response.

Pfizer tested a double-strength dose (60 mcg of mRNA instead of 30 mcg) even though they had previously ruled out a higher dose because of safety concerns. So the antibody levels are through the roof.

But the VRBPAC admitted on April 6 that there are no known correlates of protection (meaning: antibody levels do not tell you who will be immune) so these antibody measures are medically meaningless.

Sane people realize that if you turbo charge the immune response, you may also turbo charge adverse events. But the “Future Framework” allows pharmaceutical companies to skip clinical trials altogether.

Furthermore, all of these companies are developing shots to target the original Omicron strain (BA.1) even though it has already been supplanted by other variants (BA.4 and BA.5).

The FDA and these companies claim that shots targeting BA.1 will be effective against later variants but I do not know how they can possibly argue that given the total absence of actual health data.

Words that you will NOT find in the FDA “Future Framework” briefing document:

So the FDA is literally not looking out for any of the worst-case scenario possibilities.

The “Future Framework” is a plan to base the entire COVID-19 vaccine program on magical thinking rather than science.

What’s likely to happen at the VRBPAC meeting on Tuesday, June 28

The cartel is predictable because they follow a playbook and they use the same cast of characters over and over again.

The first presentation will be by CDC staffer Heather Scobie. She will likely take her slides from the June 7 VRBPAC meeting, change the date on the first slide and update them a bit to show that Omicron has become the predominant SARS-CoV-2 variant in the U.S.

The gist will be that there is no point in vaccinating against the “prototype” Wuhan lab leak variant, nor Alpha, Beta, Delta or Gamma, because it’s all Omicron right now.

What she will NOT tell you is that Moderna and Pfizer are designing shots to target the BA.1 version of Omicron and now that variant is waning and being replaced by BA.4 and BA.5. Furthermore, she will not mention the fact that these shots are fueling the evolution of variantsthat evade any protection from vaccines.

Dr. Scobie will be followed by another CDC staffer, Ruth Link-Gelles who will likely dust off one of her slide decks from the four VRBPAC and four ACIP meetings that have already happened this month and discuss COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness in adults. RLG cracks me up because she absolutely does not give a damn.

She shows slide after slide of negative efficacy from these worthless shots and she does not care because she knows that the VRBPAC will approve anything that has the word vaccine on the vial. RLG’s presentations are a token attempt to play it straight with the data but then all of her data is instantly memory-holed and never spoken of again.

Then, I’ve got to hand it to the cartel for choosing their next speaker — Justin Lessler, from the University of North Carolina. Dr. Lessler has gotten 10 grants from the Bill &  Melinda Gates Foundation in recent years (see pages 26 to 30 of his CV here).

Then he’s gotten another 10 grants from NIH and/or Tony Fauci’s National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID).

Given that, what are the odds that Dr. Lessler will criticize The Narrative(TM)? Zero.

Gates and Fauci literally have their guy inside the meeting doing the modeling about how we should think about the future epidemiology of COVID-19.

Gates figured out in 2017 that modeling is the tail that wags the dog of policy and has invested heavily in it ever since.

Dr. Lessler is soaked head to toe in conflicts of interest — he should not be allowed within 100 miles of this committee — and yet the FDA will not even require a conflict waiver from this guy.

Cartel gonna cartel.

After a short break, Stephen Hoge President of Moderna, Dena Swanson, VP of Pfizer, and Greg Glenn, President of Novavax will explain how wonderful their reformulated COVID-19 shots are but they will argue that there is simply no time to conduct proper clinical trials anymore.

None of their data will be peer-reviewed so it will all be fanciful fiction — 95% to 100% efficacy based entirely on belief.

Then the FDA will bring in two closers (and this is where it gets really interesting).

Kanta Subbarao, Director of the World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center in Melbourne, Australia will present “Considerations for Vaccine Strain Composition from the WHO. TAG CO-VAC.”

I did not understand until just yesterday (as I started to write this article) that this entire “Future Framework” is actually coming from the WHO. The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation is the biggest voluntary contributor to the WHO. so Gates is likely directing the play.

Gates requires that WHO. use the McKinsey consulting firm so this is probably a McKinsey operation (and McKinsey also works for Pharma so this is a huge conflict of interest). As Naomi Wolf points out, the involvement of the WHO. also raises troubling questions about the influence of the Chinese Communist Party over this process.

As far back as January, the WHO/Gates/McKinsey junta realized that these shots were terrible and so they decided to use that as an opportunity to seize even more power and control.

The WHO. set up a Technical Advisory Group on COVID-19 Vaccine Composition (TAG-CO-VAC) to implement these Orwellian “Future Frameworks” across the developed world to lower manufacturing costs for Pharma and avoid bothersome health data that might hurt profits.

All the messaging we have seen from the FDA and leaked to the press was initially developed and released by TAG-CO-VAC.

Before joining the WHO., Kanta Subbarao was at NIAID for 14 years, so she’s a loyal lieutenant for Fauci.

She will polish off her slides from the April 6 VRBPAC meeting to argue that COVID-19 is similar to influenza, that strain selection must be coordinated globally and that multivalent New & Improved(TM) COVID-19 Shots Now with Omicron!(TM) will save the day and end the pandemic.

None of her claims will be true but they are what the cartel wants to be said and this is more like a well-funded hostage video than anything else so that’s what we’re going to get.

Finally, the FDA will bring in Jerry Weir, who looks like a cross between Yosemite Sam and Sam Elliott. He’ll slightly update his slides from April as well and then just go round and round with droll observations about the (failed) flu strain selection process and how it should be a model — until the committee is dizzy and willing to agree to anything.

Officially the question that will be voted on is:

“Does the committee recommend inclusion of a SARS-CoV-2 Omicron component for COVID-19 booster vaccines in the United States?”

This language obscures a lot. Boosters are the market now. By calling them boosters instead of reformulated shots (which is what they actually are), they will not go through new clinical trials.

Over the summer, earlier versions of the shot will quietly be withdrawn from the market and the reformulated shots that skipped clinical trials will become the only option. So this is the FDA’s weasel word way of sliding down the slippery slope into no more clinical trials for COVID-19 shots ever again.

If the FDA stated plainly what they are up to there would be riots.

What is to be done

We only have about 24 hours to act so let’s leave it all on the field!

Please submit a formal comment to the website stating that the FDA must reject the “Future Framework” and that all reformulated COVID-19 shots must go through proper human clinical trials. The docket number is FDA-2022-N-0905.

The docket will close Monday night June 27 at 11:59 Eastern time. Click here to go to the relevant page on the website and look for the blue comment button in the upper left-hand corner.

The FDA lies about the number of comments submitted but we have a lawsuit going about that so the more comments we can submit (that they will subsequently hide) the better for our case.

In addition, below are the email addresses of everyone at the FDA/VRBPAC who has a say in this matter. It is our right to share with them our thoughts and concerns about this process. You can share your own story or copy and paste the message below.

Subject line: All reformulated COVID-19 shots MUST go through proper clinical trials

The safety and efficacy of all reformulated COVID-19 shots must be evaluated through:

  • Large (50,000+ person) double-blind randomized controlled trials with inert saline placebos conducted by an independent third party.
  • The treatment and control groups must be followed for life to monitor adverse events and all-cause mortality (no more wiping out the control group after 6 months to hide bad outcomes).
  • We also demand greater than 90% efficacy against infection with less than 0.1% Grade 3 or higher adverse events; proper monitoring for carcinogenesis, mutagenesis and impairment of fertility; and immediate release to the public of all clinical trial documents submitted to the FDA.

Originally published by Toby Rogers on his Substack page, uTobian.

Source: Children’s Health Defense

Unpacking and Defeating the Medical Tactics of a World Takeover

Today we bring you the first session in our most recent symposium, held on June 11th 2022, titled, Freedom is the Cure: Unpacking and Defeating the Medical Tactics of a World Takeover, generously hosted by UK Columnand held in collaboration with Children’s Health Defense.  At this our fourth symposium we brought together experts in science, medicine, psychiatry, finance, journalism and the law, to place the abuses of science surrounding COVID-19 in the context of a rapidly escalating global power grab, and against a backdrop of historical abuses by the medical profession. You can read about the symposium contributors here.

We have divided each session into individual presentations for you to watch and share at your leisure, summarised with links below. Meanwhile, if there just is one piece of information we hope you will take away from this event, to share with your family and friends, it is this:

mRNA vaccines pose a serious threat to mankind

During Session 1, eight speakers across six segments expanded upon this crucial theme, covering scientific, medical and clinical aspects, the underlying regulatory fraud, and legal implications.

Watch all Session 1 segments here

1. Sucharit Bhakdi: The fundamental mechanism of damage is simple and universal

To open the symposium, Immunologist and Former Chair at the Institute of Medical Microbiology and Hygiene, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Professor Sucharit Bhakdi MD, explained how and why mRNA injections pose a mortal danger to their recipients, irrespective of the disease for which they are deployed. He called the decision to use the deadly COVID spike protein for the first mRNA rollout a uniquely brilliant tactic, under which the inherent dangers of mRNA technology can hide.

The reality, Dr Bhakdi explained, is that mRNA technology – spike protein or not – perverts the genetic functioning of the body’s cells by instructing them to produce disease fragments. This transforms our own cells and tissues from ‘self’ into ‘non-self’, inviting the immune system to attack. It is a recipe for medical disaster that turns the body against itself. Dr Bhakdi called the plan to roll out the underlying mRNA technology from COVID-19 to conventional vaccines:

“The greatest conceivable man-made catastrophe of all time… Routine introduction of gene-based vaccines spells the downfall of man and mankind.”

Watch Sucharit Bhakdi’s full segment (10m 47s) here

2. Michael Palmer: Summary of the evidence – irrefutable proof of causality

Dr Michael Palmer, former Associate Professor of Biochemistry at the University of Waterloo, provided an overview of damning autopsy evidence, which unambigiuously confirms that Sucharit Bhakdi, the first in the world to warn of blood clots and organ damage from mRNA ‘vaccines’, was right. Dr Palmer spelled out the significance of histology and histopathology findings from post-vaccine autopsies performed by Dr Arne Burkhardt, showing expression of spike protein, immune attack, and catastrophic damage such as aortic rupture in organs throughout the body.            

Dr Palmer also discussed the “very remarkable” finding that bronchial tissue in the vaccinated continued expressing spike protein for nine months after vaccination. “We were promised this would be short-lived”, Dr Palmer said, noting that that the injected mRNA molecules should be expected to last only days, or at most a very few weeks.  

“The officially propounded idea.. is that the mRNA does not replicate. So how come even nine months after injection we still see the expression of the spike protein in the mucous membranes? This needs to be explained.”

As do findings of a Swedish study in 2022 showing that the Pfizer mRNA vaccine can convert into a DNA copy which can subsequently integrate into the chomosomal DNA. Such genetic modification may explain the dangerously prolonged spike protein production evidenced in Dr Burkhadt’s autopsy findings. 

On all of these developments Dr Palmer stressed: 

“We have to expect that the same will occur with any other mRNA vaccine, regardless of whether it is directed against COVID or any other infectious agent”

Watch Michael Palmer’s full segement (14m 50s) here

3. Alexandra Latypova: Pfizer’s and Moderna’s preclinical vaccine trials – evidence of scientific and regulatory fraud

Sasha Latypova is an expert in drug development with 25 years experience in pharmaceutical R&D, including working in clinical trials globally, and interacting with the FDA on regulatory approvals and pharmaceutical data. She took the audience through the shocking breaches of protocol perpetrated by Pfizer and Moderna to bring their mRNA vaccines to market, and the role of the FDA in waiving those breaches through. 

Sasha Latypova said that at every step Pfizer and Moderna showed a “shocking disregard for any previously established regulatory norms, and the FDA did not push back.” She added that European and other regulators operated in lockstep with the FDA to enable the manufacturers to sidestep protocol. She shared an image mapping out the typical pre-clinical steps omitted by Pfizer and Moderna, from drug interactions to cardiac effects to genotoxicity to carcinogenicity.

In addition to abrogating its regulatory functions, Sasha Latypova explained that the FDA misled the public on preclincal (animal) data regarding safety in pregnancy. Moderna found that its mRNA shot led to statistically significant skeletal malformations in the fetuses and offspring of injected pregnant rats, while the FDA wrote on its website that there were no pregnancy-related skeletal malformations. “Why is the FDA lying on behalf of the manufacturer?” Sasha Latypova asked. In Pfizer’s human clinical trial, she said, 90% of the pregnant women who were followed up by Pfizer lost their baby. 

Watch Sasha Latypova’s full segement (14m 17s) here

Read her article on Pfizer and Moderna’s fraud here

4. Thomas Binder: A clinical perspective and synopsis

Dr Thomas Binder is a specialist in cardiology and internal medicine, with a thesis in immumology and virology. He offered his perspective as a practicing clinician on the neccessity, efficacy and safety of mRNA vaccines, presenting both clinical and real-world evidence that the mass mRNA ‘vaccination’ campaign was neither necessary nor effective nor safe. In reality, the mRNA injections show negative efficacy, he explained. In other words, they do more harm than good, based not only on adverse events databases but numerous peer reviewed papers.   

Dr Binder went on to describe post-vaccine injury syndromes caused by a combination of the self-to-self attack outlined by Sucharit Bhakdi and Michael Palmer, and the known toxicity of the mRNA injections’ lipid nanoparticles. Post-vaccine injury syndromes can involve localised damage in some people, and generalised damage in others, he said, resulting in specific diagnoses or diffuse systemic syndromes. 

“As if this were not enough, there is repression and negligence by most doctors, hospitals, universities and medical journals. There is a scientific, medical and humanitarian disaster of unprecedented proportions.” We are just beginning to see “the tip of the iceberg,” Dr Binder warned. 

For those suffering vaccine injuries, Dr Binder outlined specific treatments for localised injuries, and he drew attention to the protocol for treating diffuse systemic post-vaccine syndromes published by the Frontline COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance (FLCCC) on May 25th 2022.

“Dear fellow humans,” he concluded, “if you have been injected… do never despair. More and more doctors are willing to help you.”

Watch Thomas Binder’s segment (16m 44s) here

5. Renate Holzeisen and Mary Holland with Polly Tommey: legal actions against mRNA vaccine approvals

Polly Tommy, film producer, author and director of programming for CHD TV, interviewed lawyers Mary Holland, Director of the Graduate Lawyering Program at NYU School of Law and president of Children’s Health Defense, and Renate Holzeisen, European Human Rights lawyer, Barrister and specialist in European and International Law, who is fighting the Corona measures in Europe. 

Mary Holland described legal actions underway in the United States by Children’s Health Defense, including:

  • A petition to the FDA to halt emergency use authorisations for all COVID vaccines, based on deaths and injuries
  • A lawsuit against the FDA for disseminating Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) vaccines when recipients believed that they were receiving approved licensed versions, fraudulently affording vaccine manufacturers the “vast liability protections” under the EUA
  • A second lawsuit against the FDA challenging authorization of COVID vaccines for children, based on the accumulation of evidence that these products are “simply not safe.”

Mary Holland outlined successful US lawsuits against the CDC and other agencies to date, which have resulted in mask mandates and vaccine mandates being struck down, adding that many other US lawsuits against COVID measures are underway. On the prospects of legal success she said:

“Judges are humans…  The courts are following the culture. I do believe that as time goes by we will see more and more successes in courts, because the judges will undersand better… Pretty much everybody at this point knows somebody who suddenly died in their sleep, or had an unexpected heart attack… It is seeping into the culture that something is desperately wrong with these shots.” 

Renate Holzeisen explained the legal significance of findings such as that from the University of Malmö that mRNA products carry a real risk of modifyling the DNA, reflecting the fact that the mRNA technology performs the same function as products previously defined as gene therapies. She stressed that there is a clear provision in the EU based on European Law that even for products not formally defined as gene therapies, but which perform the same function, an evaluation procedure must be followed via the Committe for Advanced Products. That procedure involves testing for gene toxicity and carcinogenicity, which has not been performed for the COVID mRNA ‘vaccines’. On this basis legal actions in Europe are seeking withdrawal of the conditional authorisations under which mRNA vaccines are being deployed. 

Renate Holzeisen described a very important legal decision three days earlier by a court in Sardinia, which ruled that obligatory COVID injection violated Italian constitutional law. 

Watch the full segment (16m 6s) here

6. Mary Holland and Brian Hooker with Polly Tommey: mRNA effects on fertility and sterility

Finally Mary Holland and Polley Tommey joined Brian Hooker, specialist in microbiology and biotechnology and Associate Professor of Biology at Simpson University, to discuss COVID shots and fertility. Mary Holland began by describing a WHO-backed vaccination campaign in Kenya which is the subject of a documentary called Infertility: A Diabolical Agenda. The documentary reveals that the WHO worked for 30 years to create infertility-causing vaccines, and pushed out vaccines in Kenya that amounted to forced sterilization of young women. 

“In today’s context where we’re talking about nations of the world handing over health authority to the WHO, people need to understand that it has a very dark past in Africa,” she said. 

Mary Holland cited a Kenyan doctor in the film who warned, “once they’re done with Africa they’re coming for you.”

Brian Hooker elaborated on that theme by noting that the mRNA COVID vaccines have not been evaluated for safety in pregnancy, nor with respect to birth defects. He added that fertility issues associated with COVID-19 injections are “off the map”. Reports of vaccine-related fertility problems to VAERS following COVID vaccines, he said, have increased 10-fold in the last 18 months compared to the entire previous 31 years. 

Issues being reported include menstrual difficulties, passing of clots, miscarriage, bleeding in post-menopausal women, and similar problems in unvaccinated women close to those who have been vaccinated. Shedding of the uterus, moreover, a very rare condition, has increased dramatically in the medical literature since the rollout of COVID vaccines. Dr Hooker noted that these phenomena are not limited to mRNA injections, and are being observed across COVID shots. He added that biodistribution studies conducted by Pfizer showed the vaccine to accumulate in the ovaries, and that the only human study to examine COVID injections during pregnancy ran for just three months.

Polly Tommey asked whether mothers injecting their baby girls and young daughters with COVID vaccines may be causing their sterilization. “Yes” was Brian Hooker’s answer.

Watch the entire segment (16m 22s) here

Taylor Hudak: Thank you for watching, and please share this information

Taylor Hudak is an American journalist focused on human rights, media freedom and global corruption. She researches, writes, and produces video reports and interviews for The Last American Vagabond and acTVism Munich, and has been dedicated to bringing you the voices, knowledge and perspectives of censored doctors and scientists since the start of the manufactured pandemic. In this time of extreme censorship and human need, Taylor Hudak reminded viewers of the importance of sharing the information presented during the symposium. She said:

“We extend a big thank you to UK Column for hosting this fourth Doctors for Covid Ethics Symposium. And we thank all of you for watching. We are really counting on you to share this link and to spread this message and spread the word and raise awareness. So we ask that you please share this link with your friends and with your family and on your social media. Once again we thank you.”

Watch the entire symposium here

‘We Don’t Have America Anymore’—Dr. Naomi Wolf on CCP-Style Technocratic Authoritarianism in the US

“It’s not just the vaccine. It’s a little bit of cruelty, a little bit of inequality, a little bit of discrimination, a little bit of masking children so they can’t breathe, a little bit of accepting the sacrifices of people that we don’t sacrifice back for, a little bit of complete alienation of the classes from one another … just an injection, just another injection, just losing your job. … And now a CCP-style cruelty is something that we tolerate.”

I sit down with author and columnist Naomi Wolf, author of “The Bodies of Others: The New Authoritarians, COVID-19 and the War Against the Human.”

Vaccine passports are just one part of a broader new digital tyranny we are facing, argues Naomi Wolf. “These technocratic elites really do believe that they can order the world better than you and I and that they have the right to.”

Jan Jekielek: Naomi Wolf, it’s such a pleasure to have you on American Thought Leaders again.

Naomi Wolf, Ph.D.: It’s lovely to be here with you. Thank you so much for having me.

Mr. Jekielek: I just finished reading your book just moments before sitting down with you here. It’s a fascinating read. The title actually reminds me of my favorite film of all time, which is, The Lives of Others. People in free societies have a really difficult time understanding what it’s like to live in an unfree society. A major thesis in your book is that we in free societies have now started behaving a lot more like people in unfree societies.

Ms. Wolf: Yes. That’s it in a nutshell. You can see the progression of that movement very dramatically. The last time we spoke things weren’t as advanced as they are now. The last time we spoke about a year ago, we were in a freer America than we are now. Since we last spoke, President Biden in April of 2022 declared an extension of emergency law. And for the first time his declaration is open-ended, it doesn’t have an ending date.

At least 22 states are under emergency law. In New York, where we’re sitting right now, Governor Hochul keeps extending emergency law every 30 days. In another of my books that is what I’ve called step 10, it’s the last stage of the closing down of a democratic civil society. It means that we don’t have all the rights and freedoms that we had before 2020.

The Bodies of Others makes the case that the pandemic of the last two years really provided— and it certainly was a real medical emergency—but it provided cover and a pretext for a handful of bad actors ranging from the Chinese communist party, the World Economic Forum, and tech companies to exploit the crisis in such a way as to reengineer our free open democratic societies in the West, and especially in the United States into a post-free society, a post-humane society, which is more conducive to the goals of Big Tech and China and the World Economic Forum, than it is to the goals and aspirations and intentions of free citizens. This is a targeting not just of our Western freedoms, but also of our culture and specifically of our families and our children.

Mr. Jekielek: This is very, very difficult for many people to fathom, because there’s an element of participation. One way to look at it is from the outside, and to look at what’s being done to society. But another thing is to look at what individual people are doing? How are they behaving? How is it different from before? Your book is beautiful because it is your own journey through the last few years, when whole swaths of society are voluntarily behaving in different ways than they did two years ago. Please tell me about that.

Ms. Wolf: Yes. I consciously chose to augment the analysis that I did of giant movements of Big Tech companies and government policy and economic pressures, which is so vast. The argument of The Bodies of Others is that there is a war on humanity, and some of the worst of the worst that are driving it are Big Tech companies. I’m the CEO of a tech company. So I understand that there are things that human beings can still do better than any digital technology can.

I understand there are policies that don’t make sense medically. Now, we know from recent data that lockdowns do not produce better medical outcomes in terms of COVID than keeping states and countries open, as in Florida or in Sweden. We know now that masks barely make a difference in slowing transmission of respiratory illnesses. However, they do effectively lower children’s IQ by 21 points according to a Brown University study, due to the restriction of social stimulation and linguistic stimulation.

So absolutely, the evidence is there that these Big Tech companies exploited the pandemic to suppress the human advantage.  But that’s too big of an argument to make effectively if you’re a writer. It’s a scary argument and it’s kind of overwhelming. So I deliberately chose to follow models like Homage to Catalonia by George Orwell.. There is also an amazing book I’m sure you’re familiar with by Victor Klemperer called, I Will Bear Witness.

Often when a democracy is dying or a regime is turning the screws on freedoms to create and establish new forms of tyranny, it happens very intentionally in a very incremental way. You really see this from 1930 to 1933 in Germany, which is what I go back to over and over and over for understanding of this moment. I wrote about those moments in history in my 2008 book, The End of America, in which tyrants on the Left or Right suppress democracy.

You can see them doing the exact same things, but it’s just too overwhelming to look at the macro and not tell the human story. I thought I should really follow Orwell, not that I’m Orwell, and follow Klemperer in telling the human story, so that you see what is happening day by day. The fact is, as time goes on, my husband and I are excluded from gatherings because we’re not vaccinated. Very suddenly, a new two-tier society emerges in a free egalitarian country. And suddenly, here in New York City, friends of mine, colleagues who would never discriminate against someone on the basis of their gender or their sexual orientation or their race are happily embracing a discrimination society in which some people are labeled as clean and valuable members of society and included, and other people are ostracized and marginalized and othered, and unscientifically described as dirty and causing infection to others.

As, to my horror, I was witnessing this, I absolutely wanted to tell the story of what happened in my own life. Unfortunately, I recognized exactly what it meant pretty early on, because of my earlier work on tyrannies. When there is emergency law by June of 2020, and we’re now still under emergency law, I realized they are not letting us out, and we are not going to get our freedoms back without a fight, because that’s what happens historically.

By August of 2020, I was looking at other times and places in which assembly was restricted and commerce was restricted. I was recognizing that historically you only restrict assembly and commerce and education of populations as a precursor to the theft of a targeted group’s assets and land. I realized that the group that was being targeted was humanity.

But again, these ideas are just too big to share with a reader. So I told the story not just of what we were going through, my husband and I in upstate New York, but also the story of what our neighbors were going through—restaurateur Paul in Boston, struggling to keep 20 workers’ families fed when the board of health would not even let him open up—20 people allowed, now 50, now 20 again.

I tell the story of the waitress up the road at the Copake diner, a single mom, and her son having to come home from college through no fault of her own. The American dream was just closing down for people and it was so not equal. The American dream was closing for small business owners, sole proprietors, small landlords, mom and pop shops, and those people just working really hard.

America has always been the place to work really hard and do even better. Suddenly, no matter what they did, they could not survive or compete or engage in even protecting their families and their livelihoods. These big entities, the big corporations, the Amazons, the Targets, and the Walmarts were allowed to stay open. Again, those are stories that to me were much more moving and could be told by following the lives of the people affected.

The last thing I would say about that method is that human beings tend to acclimate, which is a blessing and a curse. It means that people can survive world wars and pandemics and earthquakes and fires. But it also means that when it comes to recognizing tyranny, people normalize it too much.

I really wanted to show the impact of these lockdowns, not with just with numbers and data and statistics. I wanted to show ordinary people overwhelmed with, “My child is locked in a room all day. My 10 year old can’t speak as clearly. My family business has had to close.” By showing the coarsening and the totalitarianizing of our human interactions, the dehumanization, and the cruelty, I wanted to wake the reader up as to just how far we’ve come from that free, open, but also kind society that we had until January of 2020.

Mr. Jekielek: One thing that was really fascinating to me was your take on the Big Tech involvement in all of this. As you mentioned, the biggest of the Big Tech companies all did really well over the last two years. You were able to look at the mentality of people running these businesses, and how they look at people, and how that is incredibly compatible with all that happened. Please tell me about that.

Ms. Wolf: It really is at the heart of The Bodies of Others. As I mentioned, I am now CEO of a successful tech company, and I’m in that space, as they say, and in that world. One of the buzzwords of the tech industry is disruptive. And that’s not a negative. It’s considered a high compliment to say that someone has created software or a digital process that’s disruptive to an industry, usually.

That’s the context in which you’ve got to understand one of the core revelations in The Bodies of Others. Tech companies had an active hand in shaping legislation, and certainly in presenting the drama of COVID and lockdowns to us. They also presented the vaccine rollout in such a way as to change human behavior and to change human society. What I mean by that is that there is evidence that they liaised.

There are emails from Mark Zuckerberg to Anthony Fauci that have been disclosed. In addition to that, if you think about how you lived through the lockdowns and then the roll-out of the vaccines and what you should do about the vaccines, how you should talk about the vaccines and the lockdowns, much of what we experienced as human beings was mediated through digital platforms and digital messaging.

We were restricted to our homes for a long time, and then there was a limit on how much assembly we could engage in. In New York State, and I’ll just stick to here, churches and synagogues were closed. Town halls were closed, so we’re not having normal pre-2020 assembly. In upstate New York, especially in the first year, we were forbidden to have more than six people in our homes at one time, according to our governor.

That led me to have an illegal potluck, but that’s another story I suppose. There was a violation of our constitutional rights to assemble, and the right to take whatever risk you are going to take as an adult assembling with other humans. But the point is, we were restricted and children and college students were not allowed to go to class in-person. They were sent home, and they were tethered to their computers.

Human beings couldn’t learn from each other about what was really happening in their communities. If they had been gathering in bars, gathering in restaurants, gathering at their bowling league, they would have learned quite a different story than the story that was told to them by digital platforms. What I trace in the book is that digital platforms are invested in both the lockdown and the vaccine rollout. For instance, Microsoft and Salesforce built the first vaccine passport.

IBM built a vaccine passport. Now T-Mobile is partnering to roll out a vaccine passport in Europe. At the same time these Big Tech companies are also invested in vaccines. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is invested in the mRNA vaccines. You received constant messaging that followed you from platform, to platform, to platform about how dangerous it was outside, and a very consistent and very bizarre sentimentalizing about distancing.

You show your love to your grandmother by not hugging her, and by not visiting her at Christmas. Slogans like, “We stand together by staying apart,” just appeared out of nowhere. I trace in the book how tech companies made a vast profit by suppressing human assembly. They sent a message that it was unsafe or unlawful to gather in person in a town hall or classroom, send your child to play with their peers in a playground, or gather to worship. The message was that normal gathering could all be deadly.

When you understand that Big Tech companies are competing with human beings gathering in human spaces, you understand why there was a vested interest in suppressing human assembly. Because when you’re a tech company, you can’t really compete with humans. Human beings are encouraged to believe that everything they do is not as good as everything that digital technology does. But in fact, right now, there are things human beings do much better than digital technology.

You just smiled and the best emoji is not going to make humans feel the way they feel when a human being smiles at them. When humans gather to worship, a digital platform can’t compete with that. When they gather in a town hall, they can coordinate and create outcomes and solutions much more efficiently than they can on even the best Zoom meeting, and even better than AI can right now.

I started this discussion earlier by saying digital technology CEOs want to disrupt. One thing they want to disrupt is human assembly. Because every time your child is in a classroom with 30 other kids and a human teacher, no money is being made by tech companies. Every time you shop at your local butcher or baker, and you chat with your neighbors afterwards having a cup of coffee in a cafe, and you walk up and down Main Street, no money is being made by digital technology companies. When you’re worshiping in church, they’re not making money.

But if you can disrupt all of that, lock people in their homes, drive them onto their screens for education and communication and just to see the faces of their friends, if you’re a tech company, you’re harvesting money in multiple ways. There are really only three basic business models for most software companies; eyeballs, meaning your attention; subscriptions, meaning a paywall; and your data, what they are harvesting as you’re surfing the web, or even your biometric data and your medical data if they can get it. There are vast marketplaces for selling your data. When people are gathering with their friends, none of that is happening.

With the lockdowns there is the sudden appearance of educational technology, distance-learning tech, which was a loser industry when people could actually be in classrooms, which they love. No one would rather be at home on a computer than being in a classroom with their peers and a teacher. There were industries like meal kits which tech investors invested in, but were going nowhere until the lockdown. Even businesses like Amazon went up 20 to 25 per cent in net revenue, as did Google, as did Microsoft, as did Nintendo in the two years from 2020 to 2022. Why would they ever let that go?

The last thing I want to say about disruption is that one of the key business models for tech investors and tech companies is subscriptions. It is very common for a digital platform CEO and developers to create an experience to lure you in, where you’re having a wonderful time. You become invested in playing the game, or decorating your home virtually, or whatever the experience may be.

Then your access is suspended and you have to swipe your credit card to stay in. By then you are already hooked on whatever it is they’re selling. That is a very classic way to create a successful digital platform. Then think about vaccine passports. What these companies want more than anything is to leave the parameters of your computer and to colonize other currently non-colonized spaces, specifically the human body.

That’s the current gold rush. They’re bored and they have hit their limits of growth being in your computer, and creating things to make your digital life more convenient or more effective. But the human body is not yet fully colonized by digital technology. And your medical data is protected by HIPAA. But if you can create laws to compel people to have vaccines, be in a vaccine registry, and then require a vaccine passport to have access to commerce, schooling, public transportation, and basically, human community, then you’ve done away with HIPAA.

You’re harvesting all the data, but you have also created a subscription model in which you can turn people’s access off. I saw this in March of 2021, warned people about it, and everything I warned them about came true. You can switch people’s access to human community and commerce on and off through their vaccine passport. So it is really the ultimate hack of the world, the human IRL in the real life world, and it compels you to ask permission of technology to be human.

Mr. Jekielek: In communist China, these vaccine passports are very much in full play, and they are deeply connected with the social credit system. You talk about the connection between these two things in your book, quite extensively. In fact, they’re actually the same thing.

There you can have a green signal on your passport, which means you can travel and do whatever it was that you were planning to do. But your vaccine passport can turn red if you have been talking with the wrong person. But, that’s in communist China, that’s not here, Naomi.

Ms. Wolf: That is here. I just went to an Ivy league commencement two weeks ago, where I had to upload my vaccination status to their database, with absolutely no assurances about what that university would do with this highly private, Fourth Amendment-protected, HIPAA-protected, ADA-protected data. What people really have to ask about digital technology and about a vaccine passport is why does it have to be digital? You would know they’re not trying to turn America and Western Europe into China, if they just give you a piece of paper that says, “This is your vaccine record.”

But the whole point about a digital version is that it can be switched off. It literally takes 20 minutes of coding to add a score onto an Excelsior Pass, the vaccine passport in New York State, or any version of a digital vaccine passport. They can add a score based on what you look at on social media and whether you’re more to the Left or more to the Right, they can add all of your health records, and they can add your credit score.

Every time you sit at a restaurant table with a group of friends, maybe to talk about passing legislation to ban vaccine passports, you’re now expected to swipe these QR codes just to see the menu or even just to get in. The QR code uploads your data to a central database where there is software, and I’ve seen it, that maps the relationships of everyone sitting at that table and then builds a database on this network of relationships.

It is so easy to add these functionalities, and these functionalities do get added. In Israel people couldn’t get on public transportation without their vaccine passport. I’ve heard of other countries where people were not permitted to shop for groceries or get their children into school. You can add any prohibition onto the vaccine passport if it’s digital.

That leads to the question; what is in China? What is the Chinese social credit system? It is simply the same thing with more functionalities loaded onto it. How can a billion people be kept under tyrannical control? With these vaccine passports the CCP can identify and locate a dissident within five minutes, because you are tracked everywhere you go.

Adding to this point, we’re literally a three out of 10 in the Chinese social credit system when we accept vaccine passports, and then we get to a 10 out of 10 with 20 minutes of coding. There’s a change that has happened in American cities in the last two years and I do point this out in The Bodies of Others. When I left New York in March of 2020, there were still taxis which were not hackable. You could take a taxi from here to there and not be tracked.

There were still subways where you could get on a subway, get off a subway and not be tracked. There were human beings in the subways telling you where to go. There were maps in the subways that you could consult. I came back in the middle of the pandemic, and I say the middle because the pandemic had extended and extended and extended in time.

A lot of retooling and retrofitting of New York City took place in such a way as to bring it closer to the goal of smart cities. Smart cities are where the yellow cabs are gone, but Lyfts are everywhere. Lyft knows exactly where you’re going, who you are, who you’re meeting, who your friends are, and what foods you ordered along the way. And in the subways, the maps are gone.

You have to consult digital technology just to know where you’re going. The human beings telling you where to go are gone. Every time you consult your QR code, or you scan the QR code to see where you are to look at the map, this is data being harvested off of you, and it’s also surveillance of you.

This is just one more piece of evidence that the pandemic, the lockdowns, the vaccines, and the censorship by Big Tech are all part of a big global effort to re-engineer our world in such a way that it’s good for Big Tech, good for the World Economic Forum, good for China, but not really good for us or for the West.

Mr. Jekielek: I’ve interviewed a number of people lately and we’ve been talking about incentive structures. And data is certainly the gold of our decade. There is a massive incentivization to gather as much data as possible, and to be able to identify the minutest details about people. Some sort of global conspiracy notwithstanding, let’s pretend that’s not even in the discussion at the moment. The fact that there is this incredible push to harvest the maximum amount of data from everyone tells me that what you’re saying has to be true. Because the holy grail is absolutely everything being digital. Then you can have your smart city, and you can make sure everyone’s doing the so-called right thing.

You can make sure that they don’t eat too many burgers because that can raise their cholesterol. I don’t know. But there’s also the element of the bureaucrat, for lack of a better term. The types of folks rising in our society today are very interested in running society very efficiently, and making sure people do all the so-called right things. So this combination tells me, “Wow, this is very real, just looking at the society we have become.”

Ms. Wolf: Right. You’ve really described a Venn diagram of two of the biggest pressures on us right now, the push to harvest data about every single thing that a human being does, and the rise of this global technocratic elite. They are definitely part of the argument I make in The Bodies of Others, aligning with each other for their outcomes and using each other for their outcomes. Let me add a dark note to what you just described about technology.

We’ve assumed that the worst it can be is that data is harvested from us with everything that we choose to do using our free will as human beings. But what I’ve seen is that digital technology has its own logic, and it isn’t restricted by what human beings want to do. So once digital platforms and their oligarchical masters can figure out how to change people’s behavior to suit technology, there’s nothing moral or ethical that will keep them from changing people’s behavior to suit their technology and to suit their business plans, and that’s exactly what we are seeing.

The human impulse did not bring this about. Human beings don’t want to distance. Human beings don’t want to scan their QR codes in order to go to the Museum of Natural History. In the past, human beings in the West were able to negotiate wave and wave and wave of infectious diseases without ever locking down or tracking every move or surveilling every move.

But the dream of our digital overlords is for technology to tell humans what to do, and that’s exactly where we’re at. If you can’t get on a bus without your proof of injection, and if you can’t send your child to school without being okay in a digital database, then our whole world got reconfigured. The evidence is in the massive transfer of assets that I mentioned earlier, where people were forced to do things they didn’t want to.

They kept their businesses closed. They kept their kids home from school. They suffered. Elderly people died alone. In the process, there was a massive increase in the profits of digital technology companies. That is not going to stop, that is an inexorable push. It’s up to us as human beings, and I hope I have succeeded in this, to ask ourselves what does it mean to be human?

What do we want to save out of our human world, our human communities, our human relationships, our bonding, our touch, and our culture? We need to recognize that we have to push back against these digital technology overlords, in order to protect our humanity and our human community. What I also want to say about technocracy is that these things are now aligned. You mentioned the phrase vast conspiracy. I recognize that I’ve been called a conspiracy theorist, and I do want to speak to that.

I’ve got a chapter on this in The Bodies of Others. There aren’t that many people who have been a journalist for 35 years, a political consultant to a vice presidential campaign, and then a tech CEO.

The reason I bring that up is the phrase conspiracy theorist is bandied around a lot, and often for good reason. I’ve seen it, because I’ve been in these rooms where historical world decisions are made, in which a handful of very, very powerful people can choose historical outcomes, usually done without a press release, and often without fingerprints. That’s what lawyers in Washington are for, to let these events unfold without disclosing who benefits.

Right now we have a new reality in which there’s an elite global technocratic class. I used to be invited to their cocktail parties and they were my friends. It’s only recently that I have been ejected from that community for doing rigorous reporting on what’s questionable about lockdowns and other narratives of the last two years.

It’s really true that the global technocratic elite have more in common with each other than they do with their fellow Germans, or Americans, or Russians, or Chinese. They now are able to align above the level of nation states and bring about outcomes above the level of nation states. In fact, a goal of the World Economic Forum and of these technocratic elites is to make democratic decision-making at the level of the nation state less and less important, and to really dissolve it if possible.

We see this with policies like the Trans-Pacific Partnership, but also with the World Economic Forum and the WHO convening at the end of May to push forward a treaty that would essentially suspend national sovereignty if they choose to declare a pandemic. It would be the WHO’s decision-making, and not country by country, by country.

Interestingly, African nations pulled back on that proposal, because they know what it means to not have sovereignty or to be colonized or to be enslaved. So this is really happening. These technocratic elites really do believe that they can order the world better than you and I, and that they have the right to. That is really scary. It also puts a big pressure on our historical moment.

Mr. Jekielek: That is incredibly interesting. I want to scale it down a level. There was this really wonderful article about the Canadian trucker movement in Ottawa, Reality Honks Back, by N.S. Lyons. It develops this idea that there are virtuals and physicals, which has become a more relevant division of society. The virtuals are what some people would call the laptop class.

They are the class for whom the food just arrives magically via delivery. With screens, alone in their homes, they are able to function very well, and aren’t necessarily in touch with the realities of the common person. They’re not in touch with the realities of the people doing the physical work like the truckers and the people doing deliveries.

Actually, these are the people that were able to allow this whole policy of restrictions to function, because otherwise society would’ve ground to a halt. Have you thought about that distinction? Other people have called it a post-modernization of society. In a way, it’s possible to live very successfully in our society believing things which are dramatically opposed to reality, because you’re not checked in with reality, and you don’t have to face it.

Ms. Wolf: Right. You’re describing a profound thing that the pandemic made possible, even in inclusive egalitarian societies like the United States and Canada. The Zoom class really can spend day after day after day in their homes Zooming with other people of the same socioeconomic background and the same belief system.

Digital platforms make it possible for you to associate all day long with people who agree with you, and never run into people who don’t agree with you. We’ve accepted and embraced a two-tier economic society, in addition to the two-tier vaccinated-unvaccinated society, which is crumbling as medical events unfold. Nurses and firefighters and police officers have been lionized. Certainly nurses were sentimentalized and held up as ideal heroes and heroines during the pandemic.

And yet, so many of them have been forced to do something which is not legal, which is to have an mRNA ejection that they don’t want to have, just to keep their jobs or else they will be fired. And that violates many laws, which we don’t have to go into right now.

But it’s also just not a nice way to treat people that we were cherishing in our society and putting a lot of pressure on and expecting a lot of risk from. It’s the same with firefighters and police, we accept the sacrifice of their bodies. We accept that if there’s a fire, a firefighter will run into my home and help me save my child and my pet, and put his or her body at risk at the expense of even maybe their own families. We expect that of police officers, that they’ll rush into danger and save us and come help us.

We expect that from our military. I’m the wife of a veteran. We absolutely expect that our military men and women will run into harm’s way to protect us. Yet, these public servants have asked me and other people who are activists, “Where are you? Who’s protecting us? Who’s standing up for us? Who has our back? We protect you. You expect us to protect you. No one’s protecting us. No one has our back.” And somehow, we are all okay with that.

Actually, I don’t even see myself as an activist for medical freedom. I am really just an activist for basic bodily autonomy, which is a basic human right of any real democracy. You get to decide what happens to your body. That’s just a fundamental right from the First Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Constitution, HIPAA, ADA, Geneva Conventions, and the Nuremberg Code.

Those of us who are privileged to sit at our computers are fine with all this. We are the people who two years ago said we were good people who believed in equality and an inclusive society, and that America was a land of equality. During the pandemic, with the shearing off of the Zoom elites from daily life and from the people we depend on to keep us safe and healthy, the elites have accepted this situation without any hesitation.

What you’re getting at, Jan, is part of the essence of my book which is similar to the stone soup fable. It is that fable where the village had no food and a magical traveler said, “Look, you can make soup with this stone.” Then someone added a little meat and someone added little vegetables, and by the end they had a nourishing soup. Flip that fable around to arrive at a very evil outcome. It’s not just the virus and it’s not just the vaccine; it’s a little bit of cruelty, a little bit of inequality, a little bit of discrimination, a little bit of masking children so they can’t breathe, a little bit of accepting the sacrifices of people that we don’t sacrifice back for, and a little bit of complete alienation of the classes from one another.

It is tolerating a violation of the body with just an injection, and then just another injection. Or it’s just losing your job. We don’t have America anymore, that is the point. It happened little, by little, by little. The war wasn’t just on a political entity, the war was on American culture.

They have largely succeeded, unless we wake up. Because just recently we were a kind, decent, inclusive culture that respected other people’s boundaries and freedoms—so was Canada, so was Britain, and so was Australia. Now a CCP-style cruelty is something that we tolerate, not at the level that they have achieved in China, but far beyond what free societies are supposed to tolerate.

Mr. Jekielek: We tolerate, but also, there’s a significant number of people that are actively engaged in the cruelty. In one sense, I can hardly believe that. But in another sense, we also do know from history that this happens. It’s just hard to imagine it would happen here. Maybe that’s the disbelief. Maybe that’s why so many of us can’t see it. I don’t know any other way to put it. If I was having this conversation, even with some folks that I know well, they might say, “You’re crazy Jan, what are you talking about?”

Ms. Wolf: I know what you’re talking about. I do feel this is one more kind of splintering. In a way, America is now divided based on what news you consume. People I love and respect, who are well educated, and who read the New York Times and watch CNN and MSNBC, are being lied to every single day about every aspect of this pandemic and these vaccines and the policies around them.

In The Bodies of Others, I do trace how millions of dollars flowed and are flowing from entities like the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation to the BBC, The Guardian, NPR, and other formerly very credible and objective news outlets. With people who are absorbing all of that messaging, especially the messaging of, “Trust the science. Trust the science. You can only believe the CDC and the FDA and the NIH,” you can’t reason with them anymore.

Something very disturbing has happened. We talked about all the things we’ve lost, like decency and inclusiveness. We have also lost critical thinking. Some have spoken about mass formation psychosis. Because people in that bubble say things like, “Don’t show me that primary source documentation.” I’m not the only person who’s had this experience. But thank God that there is the other half of the country. I come from the Left, so this is kind of embarrassing to me.

That half of the country is conservative and libertarian, and they’re following a lot of independent media. Conservative media has been a lot better on these issues, and also The Epoch Times. If it hadn’t been for The Epoch Times and Children’s Health Defense (,  I would not have any primary source documentation that was credible on many, many of these stories.

This is yet one more division in this country. What is so genius about the nature of the weaponization of the pandemic as a propaganda device, is that it did not play on excluding and hating this other person because they’re the wrong color, the wrong race, or the wrong religion. What is so demonically brilliant about the messaging is that it was altruistic.

You’ve got to exclude those people for the good of the community. You’ve got to mask yourself and your child to save your child. You’ve got to inject your child with an untried mRNA vaccine that causes cardiac harms according to peer review research in minor children, for the good of the child, to save the child. You’ve got to not visit your grandmother, and not hold her hand when she’s dying or when she’s sick, for her own good.

Then people who were questioning or assembling or gathering or worshiping or just Republicans were cast as those ignorant, infectious, selfish people. This really brilliantly upended American culture, because it cast freedom as selfish. Whereas, a kind of CCP-style groupthink, submissiveness to authority, and submissiveness to the community was defined as altruistic and good. This is where we are.

To be an individual or even to engage in critical thinking is misinformation, or you’re infecting the community. There were a lot of lies about infectiousness and unvaccinated people being more infectious than vaccinated, which is just not true per the manufacturers of the vaccines and all of the peer-reviewed research. But it allowed all these people who are discriminating and excluding and suspending critical thinking to feel good about themselves.

Mr. Jekielek: It created a moral dimension, “You’re a good person if you do X. You’re a bad person if you do Y.”

Ms. Wolf: That is so true. It did something else and we’ll only see the harm in the next generation. It makes safety and security the ultimate goal and the ultimate good of society, and makes liberty a threat to society. Our kids are growing up being taught by this experience, that safety is more important than anything. That is not an American message.

The reason the book is called The Bodies of Others is fundamental to Western consciousness. The great, great innovation of the West—and I’m not saying other parts of the world don’t have extraordinary innovations, but there’s reason other parts of the world want to export and import this because it’s essential to the human condition—is the idea of the individual, self-determination, the rights of the individual, and the free will of the individual.

These rights are God-given. No one around the world who has heard that idea doesn’t want it, if left to themselves. They want it, because it’s the essence of what it means to be a person, and the goal of a person who is not enslaved. This current state narrative is that my body affects someone else’s body, someone else’s body affects my body, and it’s up to the state to police the median between my body and your body.

Instead of—it’s my decision, my risk, your decision, your risk, as in every single pandemic and epidemic up until now in the West. This state narrative is so brilliant in a horrible way, because it dissolves the Western ideal. It makes individualism into a crime and self-determination into a vice. It takes the suspension of my right to make my own decisions and recasts that as a benefit. It’s a benefit and it’s really good that we invite the state to participate, and mediate, and police our behavior. That is literally the fabric of communism.

Mr. Jekielek: I am reminded again of the film The Lives of Others, which brilliantly shows the reality of a police state. But it’s very hard to explain to people that have grown up in a free society what a dictatorship or a totalitarian society really looks like.

That was the power of The Lives of Others, it can give you an insight. Then you might ask, “What would it be like in a complete surveillance society?” And that was just with phones and audio, not this kind of panopticon that is possible with modern technology. Everything you’re talking about is incredibly disturbing. So the question that comes out at the end is what can we do about this? It seems to be, and you argue to some extent that it is fait accompli.

Ms. Wolf: I do say that the coup has already taken place. In that respect I am saying it’s a fait accompli in the United States, in the sense that we’re under emergency law. That is the definition of the end of civil law.

Mr. Jekielek: I want to touch on this very briefly. I don’t know how many of us really grasp that.

Ms. Wolf: It should be front page news everywhere that we are now under emergency law.

Mr. Jekielek: Historically, prolonged emergency law really means something. It has profound meaning. It means that we’re not the society we thought we were.

Ms. Wolf: It also makes us extraordinarily vulnerable, because we’re walking around pretty freely this summer. But emergency law means that if Governor Hochul wants to shut down businesses again, she can. She has tried to do a quarantine camp and a board of health regulation, where people are held against their will if they’ve been exposed to a bloodborne pathogen. The same is true of other states like Washington, where they tried to pass a similar board of health regulation.

It means that if they want lockdowns again in the fall, here or in Europe, and certainly in Canada, they can do it. That is what emergency law means. They can do whatever they want, basically. It’s a weaponization of the boards of health, it’s a weaponization of the CDC and HHS. So we need to face that, but what can we do?

I’ve always been heartened at what human beings can do when they figure things out. Really, we’re such an amazing species. Right now many people are walking around knowing something’s wrong, but it’s so complex and disorienting that they don’t understand what is wrong. As I said in the book, one of the things that feels so wrong is that we are Americans enduring these reflexes and coordinations and diktats. We are expected to behave more like people in a tyrannical society than like Americans. That’s the unease that we’ve been feeling, among other things, for the last two years. But I am really heartened, because I’ve seen it before with other books I’ve written, or other books that I’ve read.  When you understand what’s coming at you and why, you can strategize a lot better.

There are many things we can do, and one of them is just practical. My company DailyClout. watching this darkness descend on the country, hired a lawyer and we drafted five pieces of legislation called the Five Freedoms Bill, Open Schools Now. Now, by the way, schools are open again. In addition, the bill states; no mask mandates, no vaccine passports, end emergency law, and restore freedom of assembly. We passed them by working with state legislators in 33 states. We passed variations of most of those bills.

I’m not saying that we’re the only ones. There are a lot of state legislators, and again, embarrassingly, mostly conservatives. God bless state legislators, whoever they are, but it wasn’t my team leading the way on this, I’m embarrassed to say. But America is more free than Canada and Australia and Britain and Europe right now, largely because of those actions. State legislators are passing bills like those and similar bills, and they’re aware of the threat.

So there’s a great deal of action we can take on a state level to protect ourselves and to ensure our freedoms, despite whatever the federal government does or the meta-national organizations do. But the most important thing, in addition to understanding what’s coming at us, is to assemble.

There’s such a weakening of human capabilities and resources when people are kept apart. I argue in the book that’s why the policies were to keep us apart. But when we gather in town halls, when we invite 30 friends or neighbors over for a potluck, then we can coordinate. Then you can see this incredible grassroots resistance that I am describing in The Bodies of Others. There are groups like Moms for Liberty, for example. There are doctors like the FLCCC (Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance) and other dissident doctors, who are being critical of the weaponization of the medical establishment against people.

This is what I’m seeing at a grassroots level in America. America once again really has to be a beacon for the rest of the world, and help fight for everyone’s freedom, after we secure our own. People are realizing it’s not about Left and Right anymore, it’s about freedom versus tyranny. It’s not going to solve the problem just to switch DNC with RNC, or liberals with conservatives in other countries. This is the same script at a global level.  It’s Macron in France, and it’s Trudeau in Canada.

It was Scott Morrison, a conservative, in Australia. It happens to be the Biden administration in America, but this is really a global script. The World Economic Forum has boasted about placing their people in positions of power. This is transnational and the answer is not partisan. But I am seeing Left and Right coming together at a grassroots level; conservatives, liberals, Green Party, and PETA supporters  coming together to say, “We have to save our Constitution. We have to save our freedoms. We have to save our schools. We have to save our kids.”

In a peaceful way, people are really learning about legislation, and learning about running for school board. We have given people templates for how to bring civil and criminal charges against corrupt officials, all the way up to the governor. This is what our founders intended for us to do. Our founders really intended for us to empower ourselves with the law and with legislation, and to peacefully empower ourselves with our neighbors, when the government becomes tyrannical. So those are things that people must do.

Mr. Jekielek: We talked earlier about how siloed our societies have become, like social media-siloed. There’s conservative social media, there’s progressive social media, and there’s liberal social media. There are some structures that cross these lines, but it seems to be very, very hard to transcend them. For example, Elon Musk just recently tweeted that he only understood that Russiagate was a hoax a month prior to the tweet.

That is astounding given the incredible body of evidence that exists, and his having access to the best private intelligence in the world. But that shows this kind of atomization or basically being siloed, ideologically. How can we cross that barrier that has been created by the very technologies that we have been describing?

Ms. Wolf: That is a really hard question to answer. I confess that I believed the Russian hoax story too until it was conclusively debunked, not very long ago. I believed things that friends of mine on the Right think I’m crazy for having believed. If you watch CNN and read the New York Times, you’re getting a worldview—I don’t know how to say this, we’ve entered this time and the Smith-Mundt Act is part of this—where it is now legal to propagandize Americans.

I’m not saying those entities are intentionally propagandizing Americans. The bad reporting, the lies, and the bad science resulted from the millions from Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation going to COVID education or vaccine confidence. That affected all of our legacy media and  influencers on social media, and has caused half the people in this country who identify as the Left to get very bad information.

Just one example I talk about is how with the digital dashboards which were featured on the front page of the New York Times every single day, you couldn’t see the raw data sets. You couldn’t check them. You couldn’t verify them. The key dashboards that all these news outlets were citing turned out to have bad, unverifiable data. So we can’t really know how extensive the pandemic was, based on the inability to look at the data sets. You can’t look at them.

That did not stop the New York Times from featuring a map of unverifiable data on their homepage every single day. Having lived in the Left world, and now hanging out in the libertarian and Right world, even though I miss the Left world, I would say that each side is being fed narratives and stereotypes about the other that would persuade each side that the other is absolutely and dangerously insane.

So I get it that conservatives think liberals don’t know what a woman is, but that is not actually literally true. And liberals think conservatives all want to torch our democratic process, storm the Capitol, and are misogynist, racist, thugs who are trigger-happy. What I would say to that is we’ve been kept apart from other human beings for two years. We’ve been asked to learn about the world through algorithms on Twitter and Facebook.

When we were volunteering in a volunteer firehouse or in a consignment shop, or having a play date with our children’s friends, and we meet someone who doesn’t vote the way we do, or doesn’t think the way we do about abortion or green energy, we used to have chats with them. When we were sitting next to people on buses and we weren’t masked, maybe they thought things we didn’t think, and we would be exposed to their ideas. That has all been suppressed and our culture has been reconfigured so that we won’t do that anymore.

And when we won’t do that anymore, then we can’t find out that either we have things in common with people that we think we didn’t have in common, or that the stereotype is not right, at least in the case of this nice Republican or this nice liberal who I happen to know. But it’s very, very effective, and I go back to China all the time. I learned this from people like Michael Senger and General Spalding, and I’ve got to credit my husband Brian O’Shea.

People have thought deeply about China. The experts on China point out that the way the CCP influences a culture or wins is not through shooting bullets or dropping bombs, it’s by what is called asymmetric warfare. I’m sure you know much more about this than I do, but it’s about splintering communities. Russian methodologies are about subversion, about people confusing people, about splintering communities, and making it impossible for people to know what is true and what is not true. It is about demoralization, and making it impossible for people to organize.

So that’s where we’re at. There are a lot of people who want the United States to fail as a project and to not be a superpower. The smartest thing they can possibly do is keep us apart from each other, keep us from talking to each other, and keep us from bonding the way we used to bond. That is all the more reason to put down your digital device, and go restart all the dead groups and volunteer organizations and community centers in your neighborhood and take back this country.

Mr. Jekielek: I’m reminded of people who did crazy things. I read a story about a black man who would go make friends with actual white supremacists and actually change them. It’s very interesting. That’s a very daunting thing to imagine.

Ms. Wolf: I’m not asking that much.

Mr. Jekielek: No, but that’s how people imagine it. It would almost be like doing that. I guess we just have to be brave.

Ms. Wolf: I don’t think we have to be that brave. It didn’t used to be that brave. We have been made to fear one another, especially over the last two years. I’ll just give you one example. So I talk to you gladly, and I talk to Tucker Carlson gladly. It doesn’t mean I agree with you all about all your policy ideas, and I love exchanging views with people who don’t agree with me. I always learn something. But people I love think I’m doing something wrong in even talking to conservatives and libertarians, and it’s very dangerous. The Left especially has decided that you’re morally complicit if you have a conversation across the aisle.

Well, that’s un-American. That censoriousness, that censorship, and that cancel-culture is un-American. That is an import from communism; to cancel, struggle sessions, ejection, and wrongthink. We’ll find that when we hang out with each other again in the way we used to when we had universities and in person schools and play dates and hiking groups, that we have been de-acclimated from hanging out together with other people we don’t know. That has happened, absolutely.

But when we insist on reopening those paralyzed instincts of gathering, we’ll find that most people are not white supremacist. Most people are not Antifa members.

I’ll quote this wonderful candidate for governor, Reinette Senum, who has refused to declare a party and she’s doing really well. She has traveled up and down the state of California and she’s found that 80 per cent of the people agree on 80 per cent of the issues.

And that’s what we used to have. We used to be Americans not that long ago in my lifetime, like five years ago. What happened to us that we are even having this conversation, Jan? Five years ago, people said, “Well, I don’t necessarily agree with Jim about fossil fuels, but he’s a wonderful golfer.” Or whatever it was, we were all Americans. We worship in different places, we worship different gods, but we’re all Americans. That has been intentionally stripped from us.

Mr. Jekielek: So you’re calling for a kind of radical love.

Ms. Wolf: I don’t think it has to be a radical love. We just have to remember what are Western values and what are American values. Again, I don’t restrict those to the West or to America, because people all over the world rightly want them and are making them their own. We used to have a First Amendment that said, “You can say anything you want, and Congress will make no law of bridging freedom of speech.There is no established religion.”

We were all Americans across religious lines. We were a people that took pride in our diversity, and that’s not just diversity of race and class and gender, but it’s diversity of opinion and points of view. Going back to the founding fathers and mothers, that is what they cherished, the robust exchange of ideas. That is why we had a Civil War, so that we would not be divided.

We did not say, “Okay, fine. We want to hold slaves, and you don’t want to hold slaves. We’ll just separate.” We fought a war to not be separated. Then we kept fighting to pass law after law, and make decision after decision, and have Supreme Court decision after Supreme Court decision, to make our union more perfect and make our equality more real, and to protect more fully the exchanges of these different views.

This is the great experiment. It was a beacon light to all nations and that’s what they have tried to kill off. Let’s just remember what an American is. An American is someone who talks to his or her neighbor and listens, and doesn’t expect that person to conform to their view or they’ll rat them out to the thought police. That is an American. It doesn’t take much to remember that. It takes just knowing what has come at us and refusing it, and laying claim once again to our country and our culture and our founding documents.

Mr. Jekielek: Naomi Wolf, it’s such a pleasure to have you back on.

Ms. Wolf: It’s so good to talk to you.

Mr. Jekielek: Thank you all for joining Naomi Wolf and I on this episode of American Thought Leaders, her book again is The Bodies of Others. I’m your host Jan Jekielek. The Epoch Times is growing quickly, and we’re currently hiring an associate producer to join the epoch TV team, to work on both American Thought Leaders and Kash’s Corner. It’s a time of rampant misinformation and propaganda and you’ll be part of the solution, as we bring back honest journalism. If you’re interested or you know someone who might be a good fit, head over to That’s, all one word. We look forward to hearing from you.

Source: The Epoch Times

View the Video here:

RFK Jr’s Heroic Resistance to the CIA’s Continuing Covid Coup D’état

With his extraordinary new book, The Real Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, RFK Jr. has made it very clear that he will not allow Orwell’s 1984 totalitarian boot to stamp on his face.

His is a very rare moral courage, and he is asking us to join him, before it is too late and we enter into a new dark age, in recognizing and resisting the evil forces intent on stamping out democracy around the world.

He is not pulling his punches with language as he accuses the political-intelligence-media-money-medical-corporate-pharmaceutical conspirators of executing “the controlled demolition of American constitutional democracy.” 

For a brilliant and highly accomplished lawyer and excellent writer and speaker, the choice of those words “controlled demolition” is clearly intentional.

For anyone who doubts that the Covid-19 crisis is an intelligence-run operation controlled by spooks working with medical technocrats like Anthony Fauci, billionaires such as Bill Gates, the military, media, Big Pharma, the World Economic Forum, etc., a close reading of this book – with its 2,194 references – will disabuse one of that illusion.

The CIA has long been deeply involved with vaccines, viruses, drugs, weaponizing cancer, biological weapons, and of course massive mind-control operations – deadly propaganda in plain English – for use in controlling US Americans and foreigners alike. (ER: And MKUltra, in reference to mind-control operations, which many believe is still going on, providing us with shooters, ‘terrorists’ or thugs on demand.)

As Kennedy writes in an ironically understated way, “The pervasive CIA involvement in the global vaccine putsch should give us pause.”  Yes, a long pause. He continues [my emphasis]:

There is nothing in the CIA’s history, in its charter, in its composition, or in its institutional culture that betrays an interest in promoting either public health or democracy. The CIA’s historical preoccupations have been power and control. The CIA has been involved in at least seventy-two attempted and successful coup d’état between 1947 and 1989, involving about a third of the world’s governments. Many of these were functioning democracies. The CIA does not do public health. It does not do democracy. The CIA does coups d’état.

Just as it does Kennedy assassinations.

Character assassination of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. is what the CIA and its media mouthpieces have been doing for years. This has become more and more necessary as they have realized the great growing danger he poses to their agenda.

Calling him an anti-vaxxer, conspiracy theorist, and names far worse, is part of a concerted smear campaign to turn the public away from his message, which is multi-faceted and supported by deep research and impeccable logic.

Like his father and uncle, he has become an irrepressibly eloquent opponent of the demonic forces intent on destroying the democratic dream.

With The Real Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, he has pinned his indictment of those forces to the world’s wall for all to read.

Just as this new book will not be reviewed by the corporate mainstream media, not even negatively for fear of promoting it by doing so, so too the last book he wrote, American Values: Lessons I Learned from My Family, was completely ignored by such media.

As I wrote three years ago in the only review of that book:

When a book as fascinating, truthful, beautifully written, and politically significant as American Values: Lessons I Learned from My Family, written by a very well-known author by the name of Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. and published by a prominent publisher (HarperCollins), is boycotted by mainstream book reviewers, you know it is an important book and has touched a nerve that the corporate mainstream media wish to anesthetize by eschewal.

American Values is part memoir, part family history, part astute political analysis, and part-confessional, and is in turns delightful, sad, funny, fierce, and frightening in its implications.

What implications?

It is the heart of that book that had the obedient reviewers avoiding it like the plague, a plague introduced by a little mockingbird, as in Operation Mockingbird. No member of the Kennedy family since JFK or RFK had dared to say what RFK, Jr. did in that book.

He indicted the CIA in a carefully crafted and fully factual way for a vast array of crimes. He spelled out the long war between the Kennedys and the CIA that resulted in the deaths of his father, Senator Robert F. Kennedy, and his uncle President John Kennedy.

He threw a gauntlet down in the midst of telling an entertaining and touching family saga, which included a critique of his own youthful transgressions.

But the nation’s spooks smelled danger in the tale and they are now more acutely aware that they must censor him because his message is finding an expanding audience of people sick of government lies and very hungry for the truth.

More and more people are willing to follow this brave man into the darkness of our history and the ongoing coups d’état underway at home and abroad.  They smell a demonic author behind the Covid-19 propaganda.

While Dr Anthony Fauci understandably stands at the center of this new book, and deservedly so for his evil machinations over so many decades, it is important to recognize that he is an obedient, albeit very powerful, underling in a systemic structure of evil, who has greatly materially profited from the sale of his soul.

Yet while this is true, to read Kennedy’s chapters on Fauci’s commanding role in the HIV/Aids fraud, the AZT shakedown, illegal experiments on children that killed at least 85, etc., is enough to make your blood boil and to realize that such actions must spring from a source far deeper than the thirst for lucre.

Something fiendish and sinister is at work with all this with the suffering and death it has caused, and in the ways it has foreshadowed the COVID-19 propaganda and the complicity of the mass media in fronting for Fauci and his allies, then and now.

Kennedy exhaustively details Fauci’s work as a drug dealer for Big Pharma, even while his job at NIAID is to protect and improve the people’s health, which has deteriorated dramatically over his tenure.  (It is important to mention parenthetically but not at all incidentally that the CIA “manages” the so-called war on drugs in a similar manner.)

Thus we have a war of drugs and a “war on drugs” working in tandem in a perfect scheme to drug as many people as possible. Here are a few details:

  • Fauci has an annual $6 billion budget, most of which goes toward the research and development of new drugs.
  • He is the highest paid federal employee, more than the President, with an annual salary of $417, 608.
  • He controls 57 percent of global biomedical medical funding directly and indirectly via the NIH, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, and the Wellcome Trust, and therefore controls the scientists looking for research money.
  • He has for decades overseen the regulatory capture of government health agencies by Big Pharma.
  • The CDC, a paramilitary organization, spends $4.9 billion of its $12 billion budget buying and distributing vaccines, the vaccines that Fauci has been pushing. It also owns 57 vaccine patents.
  • Fauci and other officials receive yearly emoluments of up to $150,000 in royalty payments on products that they help to develop and push through the approval process.
  • He has for many years promoted false pandemics to promote novel vaccines, drugs, and pharmaceutical company profits.
  • Forty-five percent of the FDA’s budget comes from the pharmaceutical industry through what are euphemistically called “user fees.”
  • Fauci has a “strange fascination with,” and has invested in “gain of function” experiments to engineer superbugs, which is part of a long CIA history of weaponizing viruses, etc.

RFK Jr’s detailed exposure of Fauci’s role reminds me of reading Moby Dick and meditating on Melville’s description of Ahab – one has to enter a different mental space to begin to comprehend such evil, and even then one is struck dumb by its extent and the media’s complicity in covering it up for so long.

When I use the word evil, I am not using that word loosely, but very precisely, for the actions of Fauci and his ilk are evil, although the human being Anthony Fauci is still capable of contrition and redemption. Anything is possible if not probable, but I am not holding my breath.

Just as the actual people who shot JFK, RFK, MLK Jr, et al. were obedient servants of the system that produced them – listen to Bob Dylan’s Only A Pawn in Their Game – Fauci is a product of a structural system of evil.

This is not to excuse him but to place his actions in an historical and structural context.

Obviously, he is not a poor southern unschooled white man used by the KKK as in Dylan’s song, but a sophisticated and Jesuit-educated New Yorker brought to political consciousness within a system that amply rewards obedience to the authorities.  He is a graduate of the same Jesuit high school I attended, the elite Regis High School in NYC (and then the Jesuit College of the Holy Cross), and is considered by many of my classmates to be a national hero bordering on a saint.

Such schooling made me well aware of how the system gobbles up its youth with promises of wealth and prestige if they yoke their intellectual acumen to allegiance to the rules of the game and become what Hannah Arendt termed “schreibtischtäter” – desk killers, or what the great American poet Kenneth Rexroth called hyenas with polished faces in the offices of billion dollar corporations devoted to “service.”

That such socialization is presented as being “a man for others” within the Jesuit tradition of mind-control, doubles its effectiveness as a confidence game. That is why so many decent young people succumb to this siren call.  It then, however, demands the quelling of an uneasy conscience.

Jean Paul Sartre called this bad faith (mauvaise foi) a form of mental trickery in which one tries to “lie” to oneself – an impossibility since the liar and the one lied to are the same person – which means the deceiver must really know the truth that he is trying to conceal from the deceived.

This form of split consciousness allows those who serve a rapacious system to attempt to deceive themselves and others that they are serving a just cause. Such attempts demand an actor’s skill and the quelling of one’s inner voice.

But there are very many actors among us, as Nietzsche said, not genuine ones, but bad actors.  Fauci, Gates, et al. are bad actors in a propaganda film, at least for those who know how propaganda is produced and bad acting exposed.  Robert Kennedy is such an astute critic.

My purpose here is not to go into detail about Fauci and Gates’s connections to the U.S. intelligence and defense industries, for this is a meditation, not a review.  But those connections are massive.  Read the concluding chapter 12 in The Real Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health.

Check his sources, 298 for this chapter alone.  This is not speculation or theory, but fact.  Do your homework.  Study. Kennedy says:

After twenty years [since the insider anthrax attacks following September 11, 2001: see Graeme MacQueen’s, The 2001 Anthrax Deception (] of modeling exercises, the CIA – working with medical technologists like Anthony Fauci and billionaire internet tycoons – had pulled off the ultimate coup d’état: some 250 years after America’s historic revolt against entrenched oligarchy and authoritarian rule, the American experiment with self-government was over. The oligarchy was restored, and these gentlemen and their spymasters had equipped the rising technocracy with new tools of control unimaginable to King George or any other tyrant.

Yet the fight is far from over, and those with the tools and the mechanistic, material mindsets must contend with a rising tide of opposition to their plans for a “Great Reset” and a transhuman world.

We may be in the final battle of this war, but the human spirit is stronger than those who wish to stamp out human freedom.  Robert Kennedy, Jr. is leading the fight for the soul of the world, and it is both a political and spiritual one.

It does not take great intelligence to realize that when countries throughout the world act in a synchronized way in locking down their populations and repeat the same message on cue that such events are centrally coordinated.

The entire COVID-19 propaganda campaign, culminating with its push to enforce multiple vaccines that are not vaccines and are based on fraudulent PCR tests, has been long in preparation and the intelligence agencies’ fingerprints are all over its planning.

War game scenarios, weaponized vaccines, the CIA, the NIH, Gates, Fauci, the NIAID, DARPA, Wired magazine, the financial elites and their power centers such as the World Economic Forum, etc. – they are all involved in a conspiracy to impose a rigid global tyranny over regular people for the benefit of the world’s super-rich.

Since Fauci’s coordinated lockdowns early in 2020, there has been a 3.8 trillion dollar shift in wealth upwards to the super-rich, creating 500 new billionaires, while pulverizing the middle class, destroying small businesses, enriching Fauci and his Pharmaceutical and robber baron corporate partners, and causing vast suffering and death all around the world.

None of this is accidental. Kennedy documents it all.  He writes:

Dark Winter, Atlantic Storm, and Global Mercury were only three of over a dozen Germ Games staged by military, medical, and intelligence planners leading up to COVID-19. Each of these Kafkaesque exercises became uncanny predictors of a dystopian age that pandemic planners dubbed the “New Normal.”

The consistent feature is an affinity among their simulator designers for militarizing medicineand introducing centralized autocratic governance.

Each rehearsal ends with the same grim punchline: the global pandemic is an excuse to justify the imposition of tyranny and coerced vaccination.

The repetition of these exercises suggests that they serve as a kind of rehearsal or training drill for an underlying agenda to coordinate the global dismantlement of democratic governance…

…Virtually all of the scenario planning for pandemics employ technical assumptions and strategies familiar to anyone who has read the CIA’s notorious psychological warfare manuals for shattering indigenous societies, obliterating traditional economics and social bonds, for using imposed isolation and the demolition of traditional economies to crush resistance, to foster chaos, demoralization, dependence and fear, and for imposing centralized and autocratic governance.

US and foreign intelligence agencies have dominated the COVID-19 military project from the start.  The CIA and Fauci are central to the official “conspiracy theory” – accurately called fact – including “Operation Warp Speed” under Trump.

Trump simply carried on the work of his predecessors, including Obama, but acted as if he was opposed to it. It has always been a bi-partisan program because the CIA runs both parties.

When he was in prison in Germany after returning in 1939 from Union Theological Seminary in NYC to oppose Hitler, the German theologian Dietrich Bonhoeffer wrote the following from his prison cell before he was executed:

Against stupidity we have no defense. Neither protests nor force can touch it. Reasoning is of no use. Facts that contradict personal prejudices can simply be disbelieved — indeed, the fool can counter by criticizing them, and if they are undeniable, they can just be pushed aside as trivial exceptions. So the fool, as distinct from the scoundrel, is completely self-satisfied. In fact, they can easily become dangerous, as it does not take much to make them aggressive. For that reason, greater caution is called for than with a malicious one. Never again will we try to persuade the stupid person with reasons, for it is senseless and dangerous.

By stupid he did not mean that such people lacked intellectual ability, for they were often very smart, but that they had fallen under the spell of public power and lost all independence of mind.

Thus he adds, 

“He is under a spell, blinded, misused, and abused in his very being. Having thus become a mindless tool, the stupid person will also be capable of any evil and at the same time incapable of seeing that it is evil.”

Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr. is still trying to reach these people.  His is an heroic task.  No wonder Kennedy is named for St. Francis to whom he is devoted; St. Francis taught him and us that courage and sacrifice are what God asks of us all.

One of his father’s favorite quotes defines the son as well; it is from Edith Hamilton, the author of The Greek Way, who wrote:

Men are not made for safe havens. The fullness of life is in the hazards of life…To the heroic, desperate odds fling a challenge.

Robert Francis Kennedy, Jr. has stepped up to the challenge.  He is brave and brilliant.  We are blessed to have his witness.



Edward Curtin is an independent writer whose work has appeared widely over many years. His website is and his new book is Seeking Truth in a Country of Lies.

The Eye of the Storm

We survived the engineered release (whether accidental or deliberate) and transmission, death, and mayhem of the SARS-CoV-2 virus and its spike protein. We survived the disastrous government responses, economic lockdowns, small business bankruptcies, school closings, and unemployment. We survived the mass fear-mongering, censorship, and dictatorial medical and social mandates that were engineered, aided, and abetted by supposedly liberal media outlets and democratically elected politicians. We nonetheless got a taste (especially in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK, and the blue states of the U.S.) of what it would be like to live “the New Normal” under a Chinese Communist Party-type regime, with Bill Gates, Tony Fauci, Big Pharma, Silicon Valley, the military-industrial complex, and the World Economic Forum calling the shots.

But the storm and the coordinated assault on our mental and physical health, civil rights, and constitutional liberties is not over. Big Pharma and government bureaucrats are still trying to pretend that the latest variants (more akin to the common cold or a mild season flu) of COVID-19 are dangerous, even for children and infants. They are also still trying to tell us that the experimental, rushed to market, blockbuster COVID-19 vaccines work, and that they are safe, which they are not. As our ally, Millions Against Medical Mandates, warn us “wake the hell up, they are coming for our children.”

On the bioweapons front, as we have reported, Bill Gates, Fauci, and the Pentagon (along with China, Russia, and the other superpowers) have been and continue to fund the illegal genetic engineering and weaponization of viruses and pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, Bird Flu, Marburg virus, Ebola, Anthrax, lentiviruses, Adenoviruses, and other genetically engineered pathogens, using the excuse that these reckless experiments are necessary to prevent disease, ward off biological weapons attacks from our enemies, or develop vaccines.

As Judicial Watch recently reported, based upon over 2300 documents that the National Institutes of Health were forced to provide under the Freedom of Information Act, there have been (and still are) dozens of illegal, unauthorized Gain-of Function experiments taking place in U.S. government and university labs, with numerous recent reported leaks, accidents and security violations in these U.S. biolabs.

Until we shut down the biolabs in our backyards and across the world, bring the perpetrators  of COVID-19 to justice, and strengthen and enforce the Biological Weapons Protocol that the U.S. and every nation is supposed to abide by, none of us are safe. Unless and until we ban the lab engineering and weaponization of pathogens on a global scale, the opportunity will surely rise again for the global elite, Big Pharma, and the vaccine profiteers to take advantage of the next lab or deliberate release of a deadly bioweapon to complete their totalitarian “Great Reset.” Gates, Fauci, and the other architects of the Great Reset are already publicly predicting, and indeed planning for the next pandemic.

On the nuclear weapons front, thank God we have thus far dodged the thermonuclear bullet. We have avoided an accidental nuclear exchange and a nuclear holocaust with Russia resulting from the power-crazed U.S. strategy of fruitlessly trying to “bleed Russia dry.” We are literally playing Russian nuclear roulette by expanding NATO and surrounding Russia with first strike nuclear weapons and submarines while escalating an endless war in the Ukraine that could have been prevented, bringing about massive death and suffering for both Ukraine and Russia.

While the “eye” of the maelstrom called 2022 provides us with a temporary respite, there is absolutely no time to lose. We must force our brain dead and corrupt politicians, in both parties, to negotiate an end to the war in Ukraine, lift all sanctions, and to begin the long-term negotiation process to ban all biological and nuclear weapons forever.

Sign the OCA Petition to Ban the Reckless “Gain-of-Function” weaponization of viruses and pathogens.

Source: Organic Consumers Assn.