Category: Fauci

The New “Safe & Effective” Concentration Camps

Controversial Drug Remdesivir Plays Key Role in COVID-Related Hospital Deaths: Dr. Ardis

The antiviral medication remdesivir has played a controversial role in the COVID-19 treatment protocols used by hospitals that many families allege resulted in the death of their loved ones.

Among the drug’s potential side effects is acute kidney failure, which many physicians argue is the source of the same symptom reported by the medical establishment to have been caused by COVID-19.

Dr. Bryan Ardis, CEO of Ardis Labs and host of The Dr. Ardis Show, said he watched his own father-in-law die in a hospital in February 2020 after being taken through the same hard-wired, standard-of-care protocols he would eventually witness playing out in the lives of others.

“It was the most traumatic thing I’d ever experienced in my whole life,” Ardis told The Epoch Times.

Among the multiple problems with his treatment, Ardis said, his father-in-law had been erroneously diagnosed with having the flu and given an antibiotic called vancomycin, which, like remdesivir, is known to cause acute kidney failure.

“Not only did he not have the flu, but the doctor also treated him with a horrifically toxic, last-resort antibiotic that doesn’t treat the flu,” he said.

When he asked the doctor why he had his father-in-law on the antibiotic that was causing his kidneys to fail, Ardis said the doctor told him that it was hospital protocol.

‘It Wasn’t From the Virus’

For Ardis, it became a foreshadowing of what was to come with the listed COVID symptoms in fact being caused by the drugs used to treat COVID, he alleged.

“In March 2020, every medical doctor started saying they had never seen a respiratory virus move from the lungs to attack the kidneys, which then causes acute kidney failure,” Ardis said.

But the kidney failure wasn’t from the virus, Ardis said.

Initially, Ardis said he thought they were using vancomycin because the stories in the news matched his own experience. However, he later found that the antiviral drug remdesivir, which itself is reported to cause acute kidney failure, was being used through emergency-use authorization to treat COVID before it was later approved by the Food and Drug Administration in October 2020.

Least Effective and Deadly: Study

Ardis’s research brought him to COVID protocols set by Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), who had deemed remdesivir as “safe and effective” based on an experimental trial in Africa during an Ebola outbreak.

In the study found in the New England Journal of Medicine, a safety board found remdesivir to be “the least effective and the deadliest drug in this trial,” before it was suspended, Ardis explained.

“Fifty-three percent of people they gave that drug to died,” Ardis said.

Ardis said he considered whether Fauci had been given bad advice.

“I go to the end of the study and … imagine my shock when I saw that it was actually funded by Fauci’s department at NIAID,” Ardis said. “He would have been given a monthly review of everything coming out of that Ebola trial. The safety board would have let him know it was the least effective and deadliest drug in the trial.”

For Ardis, the study, which predated Fauci’s “safe and effective” estimate, showed that Fauci was not being truthful, Ardis alleged.

Fauci then asked the federal government to buy all the experimental reserves of remdesivir from the California-based pharmaceutical company called Gilead, Ardis said.

Further research didn’t improve his medical opinion of remdesivir, Ardis said, leaving him to conclude that the kidney failure doctors were reporting to be caused by the virus was in fact caused by remdesivir.

“Doctors had no idea they were being set up to use a drug that had such toxic effects and was proven to be ineffective and very dangerous,” Ardis said.

Support Behind Remdesivir

Though NIAID didn’t respond to The Epoch Times’ request for comment, Fauci told reporters in 2020 during a White House press briefing that the data “shows that remdesivir has a clear cut significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery. This is really quite important.”

A final 2020 report from the National Institute of Health said that remdesivir was “effective against viruses in the coronavirus family.”

The NIH said in its report that remdesivir accelerated recovery for hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19.

“Our findings show that remdesivir is a beneficial treatment for patients with COVID-19,” says study author Dr. John Beigel of NIAID in the report. “It may also help to conserve scarce health care resources, such as ventilators, during this pandemic.”

Physicians such as Dr. Arnold Weg reported to NBC News in 2020 that remdesivir helped him recover from COVID, and that from this personal experience, “I feel very strongly that it should be used.”

Dr. Aneesh Mehta at Emory University Hospital in Atlanta told NBC News in the 2020 report on remdesivir that “remdesivir will get many of our patients home to their families more rapidly and with less side effects.”

As public support for remdesivir grew, Ardis continued to give his second opinion, sharing what he believed to be the truth about remdesivir, COVID protocols, alternative treatments, and the then-imminent vaccines.

It was Ardis’s information that helped people who reported equally traumatic experiences with hospital protocols, such as Kristi Schmadl and Greta Crawford.

‘Enough Sedatives to Put Down a Horse’

Schmadl told The Epoch Times that she believes it was remdesivir that caused her mother’s death in a hospital, based on medical records that show a worsening of kidney levels with each dose.

In addition to not feeding her mother and giving her “enough sedatives to put down a horse,” Schmadl said hospital staff attempted to label her mother as Do Not Resuscitate (DNR).

“We had one doctor tell us that if we didn’t put a DNR on her, he would,” she said.

Schmadl’s mother, who had only one kidney, was allegedly given vancomycin, fentanyl, precedex, and other drugs to which Schmadl said she and her family never consented.

“They called us on Aug. 15 to tell us our mother had ‘expired,’” Schmadl said. “That’s the word they used.”

Schmadl connected with Crawford, who herself was being treated with remdesivir in a hospital when she demanded that hospital staff cease treatment, remove her IV, and let her leave.

“My husband wheeled me out,” Crawford told The Epoch Times. “I was still on oxygen and weak.”

Crawford said she’s the only person she knows of who was still allowed a family member to be inside with her for 12 hours a day, as hospital COVID protocols usually require that the patient be isolated from their families.

While in the hospital, Crawford said a nurse “pressured her” and her family to get vaccinated while being treated with remdesivir.

“After my first dose, I noticed my hands and feet swell,” Crawford said. “At the time, I didn’t know that it was my kidneys shutting down.”

When she asked her doctor what was going on, Crawford said he stared at the floor and mumbled, “COVID’s strange” before walking out.

“I’ve never seen a doctor act like that,” Crawford said.

Crawford had COVID for two weeks before she entered the hospital, and for that time she had not experienced the symptoms she experienced when given remdesivir, she said.

“My white blood cell count shot up, I got a blood clot in my leg, I would have vomiting—all of these symptoms I had not experienced at home,” she said.

After her husband took her home, Crawford said she spent two months on the couch healing.

“I had so much fluid in my lungs, and then I went through a detox process with different supplements and vitamins to try to get all of this stuff out of me,” Crawford said.

It was during this time that she began doing what many vaccine promoters were warning against at the time: She did her own research.

Hospital Alternatives

She followed Ardis’s podcasts, met Schmadl, and launched the website to inform people “of the dangers of remdesivir, hospital protocols, and the true intended purpose of their use.”

Through her website, Crawford has gathered 170 stories of people whose loved ones died in hospitals throughout the United States, and offers alternatives to hospitals.

“It’s been a labor of love, because I don’t want people to suffer like I suffered,” she said.

Crawford works with families to get people out of hospitals with a hospital hostage hotline and provides education for those who want to know what red flags to look for when dealing with hospitals.

“It’s obvious what they’re doing now,” she said. “They need to be held accountable.”

For Crawford, hospitals have become “the new concentration camps.”

“But instead of dragging people in on trains, people are walking in willingly because they think they are going to get help, but they’re being murdered,” Crawford said.

Source: The Epoch Times

Viral: The Search for the Origin of COVID-19

Alina Chan and Matt Ridley, Viral: The Search for the Origin of Covid-19 (Harper: New York, 2021). 416 pp. ISBN: 978-0063139121. $19.99.

Something happened in 2019, probably towards the middle of the year. It might’ve been a single event, or perhaps a series of them. If it was an accident, it’s very possible that the people most directly implicated weren’t aware at first; some of them might still be uncertain about their responsibility. If it was deliberate, it’s unlikely anybody intended – let alone envisioned – what actually came to pass. Most people with subject expertise know or suspect that scientists are directly implicated in this event, but few will discuss it openly. I am talking, of course, about the release of SARS-CoV-2 into the human population.

Alina Chan and Matt Ridley’s Viral is, as far as I know, the only book from a major trade publisher to consider the problem of virus origins in anything approaching an objective light. Of necessity, its treatment is heavily compromised. Viral appeared in November 2021, as the mass vaccination campaign lent new political utility to virus terror and encouraged a sudden openness to lab-leak theories. Throughout Viral, from their dedication to “the people who have suffered and lost during the Covid-19 pandemic” to the final page, Chan and Ridley accordingly maximise the risk of Corona infection. More seriously, they undermine their own analysis by striving everywhere for an exaggerated moderation, often failing to draw the conclusions demanded by their own evidence and burying the lede. Probably Harper editors are as much to blame for this as the authors; the effect is to create a false equivalency between the natural and artificial origins theories, and to present a far weaker case for laboratory origins than is possible.

Among the weakest moments of the entire book are chapters 12 and 13, Chan and Ridley assume the guise of attorney making final statements to a jury, in favour of “Spillover” and “Accident” respectively. This isn’t a trial; these scenarios aren’t even mutually exclusive; and “Accident” is far from the only alternative to a zoonotic event. If anything, the lab-leak theory is the centrist view, between the benign and sinister extremes of zoonosis and bioattack. Thus do Chan and Ridley impose an intellectual frame upon the problem that simultaneously blinds readers to the full spectrum of possibility and enfeebles their own position.

But, for all of that, Viral is also a serious and useful book that provides valuable perspective on the recent history of laboratory leaks, which are far more common than almost anyone realises (Chapter 7); the recent history of gain-of-function research (Chapters 8 and 9); the deliberate obfuscations of the World Health Organisation (Chapter 10); and much else besides.

At its core, Viral is an extremely useful compendium of the evidence that the loose Twitter collective known (not altogether fortunately ) as the Decentralised Radical Autonomous Search Team Investigation COVID-19, or DRASTIC, has assembled on the origins of SARS-2. The evidence is rooted above all in the research and strange behaviour of a small group of scientists associated with the Wuhan Institute of Virology, including the so-called bat-woman Shi Zhengli and her close collaborators, Ralph Baric at Chapel Hill and Peter Daszak of the EcoHealth Alliance.

Source: Eugyppius a plague chronicle

‘A Letter to Liberals’: Why I Wrote It and Why I Hope You’ll Read It

Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.’s latest book, “A Letter to Liberals — Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals,” is available now to download free, or buy from Amazon and other retailers.

“If the vaccinated are equally likely to spread COVID as the unvaccinated—as Dr. Fauci now acknowledges—then on
what basis do we justify the draconian mandates that denied unvaccinated workers their jobs, children their education, and encouraged the bullying and bigotry that made the unvaccinated reviled second-class citizens?”

“Attacks on me, quite frankly, are attacks on science. … So if you are trying to, you know, get at me as a public health official and scientist, you’re really attacking not only Dr. Anthony Fauci, you’re attacking science … You have to be asleep not to see that.” — National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Director Dr. Anthony Fauci, “Meet the Press,” June 9, 2021

It is troubling enough that Dr. Anthony Fauci, our country’s leading public health technocrat and the fiat leader of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) — the world’s principal funder of scientific research — would make such a narcissistic and scientifically absurd statement.

The more serious concern is that the majority of my political party — the Democrats — and the mainstream media generally accept Fauci’s assertion as gospel.

Journalists — even science journalists — act as if they believe any pronouncement by Fauci (or the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention or World Health Organization) should mark the end of scientific inquiry.

My latest book, “A Letter to Liberals — Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals,” emerged from a congenial and ongoing conversation during the COVID-19 pandemic between myself and my longtime friend and former law partner, John Morgan, a lifelong champion of the Democrat Party and liberal values.

Download for Free: Robert F. Kennedy’s New Book — ‘A Letter to Liberals’

I invited John, who reveres Fauci and accepts the scientific validity of the government’s COVID-19 countermeasures, to reengage his critical thinking skills and accept my challenge to a science-based debate — and he did.

I hope this free book will encourage other liberal Democrats to do the same — because that’s the kind of dialogue we need in order for democracy to function.

In what was arguably one of the most important speeches in American history, President Dwight D. Eisenhower — a Republican — warned our citizenry against the type of misplaced faith in federal scientific bureaucrats we are witnessing today.

Eisenhower said:

“The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist. … We must never let the weight of this combination endanger our liberties or democratic processes. …

“In this revolution, research has become central; it also becomes more formalized, complex, and costly. A steadily increasing share is conducted for, by, or at the direction of, the Federal government. … The prospect of domination of the nation’s scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present — and is gravely to be regarded. …

“We must … be alert to the … danger that public policy could itself become the captive of a scientific-technological elite.”

It is my hope that “A Letter to Liberals” will remind all Americans that blind faith in authority is a feature of religion and autocracy — not of science or democracy.

To that end, this letter is a challenge to my fellow liberals to reexamine the scientific assertions upon which rest the oppressive policies that have savaged the presumptions of classical liberalism and the U.S. Constitution.

It is past time our nation had an open conversation about the strategies supposedly enacted for ending the pandemic, and the best measures for avoiding future crises.

Download my free book — “A Letter to Liberals” — here.

Doctors Criticize Fauci for Saying COVID Vaccines Induce ‘Temporary’ Menstrual Irregularities

Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and is converted into DNA.

Dr. Anthony Fauci’s recent comments on menstrual irregularities met with serious rebuttal from gynecologists, who say COVID-19 vaccines should not have been injected into pregnant women without adequate safety testing.

“Well, the menstrual thing is something that seems to be quite transient and temporary, that’s one of the points,” Fauci said in an appearance on Fox News on July 25, upon being asked about the effect of vaccines on menstrual cycles.

“We need to study it more,” Fauci added.

Fauci is the director of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) and has been a frontman for COVID vaccine information in the United States.

Dr. Christiane Northrup MD, a former fellow in the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, remarked to The Epoch Times on Fauci’s comments: “Unfortunately the menstrual problems we are seeing are far from transient and temporary. Many women have been bleeding daily or having heavy, irregular, painful periods for an entire year. And some of these are well past menopause. Something is way off here. ”

Dr. James Thorp is an extensively published 69-year-old physician MD board-certified in obstetrics and gynecology, as well as maternal-fetal medicine, who has been practicing obstetrics for over 42 years.

“The significant and dramatic changes in menstrual patterns occurring after COVID-19 vaccines should not be marginalized. It is indicative of major adverse effects on women of reproductive age. The stakeholders claimed that the vaccine would remain at the injection site in the deltoid muscle. This was misinformation. The lipid nanoparticles (LNP’s) are now known be distributed throughout the entire body and to be concentrated in the ovaries according by at least two studies. Schadlich and colleagues demonstrated concentration of the LNP’s in ovaries of different mouse species and Wistar rats, in vivo, in vitro and by sophisticated microscopic imaging in 2012,” he told The Epoch Times.

A lipid nanoparticle is an extremely small particle, a fat-soluble membrane that is the cargo of the messenger RNA.

Pfizer’s Internal Documents

Pfizer’s internal documents, obtained via the Freedom of Information Act, show a 118-fold increase in the concentration of LNPs from the time of injection to 48 hours.

“The LNP’s are known to include toxic substances including polyethylene glycol and pseudo-uridinated mRNA. The limited number of ovum in the ovaries (about 1 million) are exposed to potentially toxic substances and could potentially have catastrophic effects on human reproduction,” Thorp said.  

“The stakeholders claimed that the pseudo-uridinated mRNA could not be reverse transcribed into the human DNA. This was misinformation,” he added, referring to a Swedish study published in February 2022 that concluded that Pfizer’s COVID-19 vaccine is able to enter human liver cells and is converted into DNA.

Thorp and former Pfizer VP Michael Yeadon believe that the medical industrial complex had unequivocal evidence on the vaccine’s danger in pregnant women.

“This is proven not only by VAERS but also by Pfizer’s own internal document ‘Pfizer 5.3.6 post-marketing experience’” Thorp said.

Within the first 90 days of trials, there were 1,223 deaths, multiple severe adverse effects, and a 45 percent complication rate in pregnancy cases (274) that occurred in vaccinated mothers (124).

The 2012 study, mentioned by Thorp earlier, says that after testing with different mouse species and Wistar rats, “a high local accumulation of nanoparticles, nanocapsules and nanoemulsions in specific locations of the ovaries was found in all animals.”

Yeadon believes that the pharmaceutical industry “definitely knew,” since 2012, that the lipid nanoparticles would accumulate in the ovaries of women that took the vaccines.

“No one in the industry or in leading media could claim ‘they didn’t know about these risks to successful pregnancy,’” Yeadon told The Epoch Times in April.

Sidestepping Responsibility

Northrup fears that there could be much more data related to reproductive damage that hasn’t been discovered yet.

“The phrase ‘this requires more study’ whilst downplaying the current evidence of harm is a common way to discount the experience of thousands of women. Unfortunately, academic doctors do this all the time as a way to sidestep responsibility for the untoward effects of their treatments,” Northrup said.

“The female menstrual cycle is considered a vital sign as important as blood pressure and body temperature when it comes to health assessment. Our initial findings of bleeding and decidual cast shedding in women who have been exposed to those who have had the experimental injection suggest that what we’ve seen so far is just the tip of the iceberg. The reproductive effects of this shot could be far worse than we’ve been led to believe,” Northrup previously told The Epoch Times.

Tiffany Parotto, lead researcher of MyCycleStory, a survey that found many problems in women after they took the COVID vaccines, told The Epoch Times in May that she was distressed about the censorship and deletion of a Facebook group of about 21,000 members where women were talking about their menstrual irregularities.

Fauci’s office did not respond to a request for comment by press time.

Source: The Epoch Times

17 More Reasons I Won’t Be Getting A Covid Vaccine

by Christian Elliot

A lot of people have asked me for an update to my original 18 reasons article.

Many have asked if I’ve changed my stance now that the jabs have been available for longer.

I wish I could say that in the seven months since writing that post, that world events (and vaccine effectiveness) convinced me I was wrong.

That definitely did not happen.

I stand by all my original 18 reasons.

Now I have additional concerns about these jabs…many of which I find even more alarming.

Quick aside: For anyone seeing the title of this article and feeling like it’s not relevant because you already got the shot…

…can you give me one minute?

I promise:

  1. I’m not your enemy.
  2. This article is relevant to you.
  3. I’m serious about understanding your perspective too.
  4. I’m going to say at least two important things you strongly agree with.

If you make it to the end and still disagree with me, that’s ok.

Maybe in reading what’s below you’ll understand why so many people are leery of these shots.

Even better, maybe you and I can model some constructive dialogue together—at the end of this post I’ll even offer an invitation to talk with me directly if you think I’m missing the boat.

With that in mind, let me attempt to start this post with a couple of things we agree on…

1) We all want covid to go away!

I, like you, am beyond tired of this topic.

I hate the division it brings, the lives it is claiming, and the political football it has become.

2) We all want a return of our freedoms.

As I see it, the challenge with ending covid is we differ so fundamentally on what that will take.

Where one side sees compliance as the path back to freedom, the other side sees resistance as the only way to truly be free again.

Unsurprisingly, both sides are exceedingly frustrated that the other side doesn’t “get it.”

We say with contempt: “If you people would just do your part (i.e. think like me), all of this will go away.”

My friends (on either side of this discussion), the idea that one side is going to fold, is not going to happen.

So, instead of anger, avoidance, or snide comments on social media…

Come, let us reason together.

Bridging this chasm of perspective will require a lot of difficult conversations, and probably a herculean level of grace, deference, and a willingness to look for where we might be wrong.

That’s our gap, so let’s face it boldly and with humility.

May a better way start today.


My hope is that you’ll consider this post as the next step in an ongoing conversation.

To that end, if you’re inclined to comment, please do.

The rules of engagement are the same as they are for my other posts:

  1. You must be respectful and treat others the way you want to be treated.
  2. You have to logically present an argument not just post a link.
  3. You can’t use labels (anti-vaxxer, conspiracy theorist, blind sheep, etc.) – labels are divisive and intellectually lazy. Let’s do better.

Agree or disagree with me, if I see you break any of the rules, your comment will be deleted.

All right, enough with the long introduction.

Without further ado, here is why I’m more against these so-called “vaccines” than ever.


If ever there was an obvious example of willful determination by our public health officials to believe in something despite all evidence to the contrary, these injections are it.

Remember that “95% effective” story we were sold?

What a misplaced hope that turned out to be.

While we could look at compelling evidence of failure from the most vaccinated nations and states in the world (Vermont, MaineColorado, the UK, Wales, Chile, Seychelles, Ireland, or Mongolia), let’s just stick with the most glaring example of the utter failure of these shots—Israel.

With the belief that Israel would be the shining example of how to get back to normal, Netanyahu sold out his entire country in an exclusive contract with Pfizer.

Israel is a shining example all right, but not for vaccine effectiveness.

What am I talking about?

I’ll leave it to Dr. Peter Doshi (editor of the British Medical Journal—BMJ) for the mic-drop article about this ridiculous, efficacy sham.

Here is the inconvenient data of what Doshi calls “The elephant named ‘waning immunity’.”

  • In early July 2021 Israel reports the vaccine was 64% effective.
  • By late July 2021, Israel reported the vaccine was 39% effective.

That’s a major drop in less than a month.

Curious about the efficacy rate after that?

Me too…but Pfizer supposedly doesn’t have any data past six months into their trial—i.e. March 2021.

Um…how long have these trials been going on?

And that prompts another important question:

How could the clear signals of dramatically-waning immunity lead to a “full FDA approval”?

Side note: I’ll discuss the “full-approval” ruse shortly.

For now, let’s set aside that approval issue…

(and set aside 1. The reality that the un-injected, human immune system remains 99.9% effective at beating covid, and 2. The Lancet article that says the absolute-risk reduction a jab confers is a whopping 1.3% decreased risk at best)

…and stick with the mainstream narrative.

Given the waning efficacy, what sense do these shots make, and why in the world are they the only way back to normal?

One would think (in light of such concerning data) that world leaders would admit they picked the wrong (exclusive) strategy and at least give us more options besides mandating increasingly-worthless shots for a version of a virus that scarcely exists anymore.

Don’t hold your breath.

Here’s why…

Predictably, instead of admitting the painfully obvious, ending the jab program, or pivoting to other treatments, Israel (and now the CDC) is doing the opposite:

Now the double-jabbed get to rejoin the “unvaccinated” group.




Let that sink in…

The first and second shot didn’t work, the third isn’t working either, so let’s plan for four?

Um…remind me the definition of insanity again.


Apparently so…

This is our life for now, in waves” said Salman Zarka, Israel’s chief covid-19 officer.

Here’s my question: Where does this jab treadmill end?

Do we really think they can outsmart nature and “booster” our way to zero covid?


Did we forget how wildly ineffective (often as low as 10%) the annual flu shots are?

Did we forget that “fully approved” drugs (that were actually studied for years) frequently get pulled from the market—hello Vioxx, Celebrex, opioids, etc?

Are we really going to embrace the idea of a no-exceptions, twice-annual (or multi-annual) “immunity membership,” sacrament, I mean passport, in order to live our lives?

But here is a concerning situation, and a super-uncomfortable reality we have to face…


Mindbender alert: Could it be that it’s actually the vaccinated who are keeping covid going?

For those who want to get bogged down in the country-by-country stats, knock yourself out, (there are 68 countries in this study) but to not get too bogged down here, let’s observe the high-level, repeated pattern.

The more vaccinated a country (or state) becomes, the more there is a corresponding surge in covid deaths, and the surge is typically higher than the natural, pre-jab peak.

I could throw a bunch of graphs and headlines at you but suffice it to say they tell this story…

Regardless of how you want to look at the data, the bottom line is this:

The jabs are completely failing to make quantifiable difference in covid when compared to countries with low uptake rates.

The conundrum I see for anyone who still wants to believe in these shots is that you either:

  1. Have to swallow the dissonance that the shots are ineffective and necessary…
  2. Explain the data by saying the shots are working and the reason the death count is so high is because too many deaths are being mis-labeled as covid deaths, or…
  3. Believe that we didn’t get everyone on the globe vaccinated fast enough—which (even if everyone wanted it) would be logistically impossible given how fast the virus mutates.
  4. Whichever way you go, the narrative/vaccine solution doesn’t work.

What’s worse, it appears those who take the shot are becoming super spreaders.

No wonder the CDC re-masked us and even revised the definition of a vaccine.

No wonder other nations are barring Israelis from entering their country.

How could this be happening?

Let’s geek out on the science for a hot second…


Not only is data pouring in about how ineffective these shots are, it appears they are actually pressuring the virus to mutate.

It’s not like vaccine science didn’t see this coming.

If you read my original 18 reasons article you may remember I mentioned Dr. Geert Vanden Bossche—one of the most respected vaccine scientists on the planet.

He put his entire (impressive) reputation on the line when he raised the alarm, called for an immediate pause to the covid vaccine program, and asked for public debates among his peers.

Did you catch those debates?

Of course, you didn’t—Geert was vilified and the debates never happened.

Yet, Dr. Vanden Bossche is starting to look like a prophet, or at least an insightful and refreshingly-honest scientist. Here’s a quick recap of three of his predictions so far.

He told us that vaccinating people in the middle of an outbreak would:

  1. Accelerate the virus’ ability to mutate: Hello Alpha, Beta, Gamma, Delta, etc.
  2. Inevitably produce vaccine-resistant strains: Hello new surge in infections.
  3. Train the immune system to fixate on ONE specific piece of the original SARS CoV-2 virus (the spike protein) and thus be non-responsive to future variants.

Never mind the first two problems…do you see the significance of Geert’s third point?

An immune system that is non-responsive to future variants, is a body that can be defeated by future versions of the common cold—thus his warning of a potential for a mass-casualty event.

Has Geert changed his tune now that we have several months of data?

Nope…he’s doubling down.

In another recent interview (with Robert Malone, the inventor of the mRNA vaccine), Geert went into more detail on the science of why these jabs are so potentially deadly.

You can click here to watch that interview.

Appreciate for a second that these men are at the top of their field.

They are titans of the vaccine world, and both men are calling for an end to the covid “vaccine” program, not only because it is mathematically impossible to inject our way out of covid, but because they know it is becoming increasingly deadly to attempt to do so.

Bet you didn’t hear that from Fauci.

I’ll leave the last word on this one to Dr. Vanden Bossche.

He said that what we are doing is so dangerous for humanity that he called for us to…

Make love, not war.


Let that sink in for a second…

If you don’t like that perspective, take it up with Dr. Vanden Bossche, or Dr. Robert Malone, or this Nobel Prize winner—all three men are saying the same thing.

I’m just the messenger.

If that perspective has you a tad freaked out, keep reading…I won’t leave you there, but we need to see how deep this rabbit hole goes.


Not only do these jabs have the potential to make the immune system non-responsive to future variants of the coronavirus, there are at least three other major problems.

FIRST, it is now becoming clear these shots, at least temporarily, turn off your immune system’s ability to recognize friend from foe.

Part of the mechanism of action (for which a Nobel Prize was awarded) is that these injections cause the “toll-like receptors” of our immune system to not attack foreign mRNA.

Toll-like receptors are the gatekeepers that empower the immune system to do things like:

  1. Recognize native vs. foreign mRNA
  2. Distinguish healthy cells from cancer cells
  3. Put viruses in check so they remain dormant

Can you see why that might be a problem?

Say hello to the possibility of the return of aggressive cancer and the opportunity for dormant viruses to remerge.

Maybe you even know people this has happened to?

SECOND, we were told the injected spike proteins would stay hyper-local in the shoulder and thus the immune system would surround the enemy, learn its ways, clean up the injection site, and humoral (memory) immunity would confer protection.

As it turns out, the logic of that first assumption makes as much sense as having a peeing section in a pool.

In what’s called a “biodistribution study” Japanese researchers found the spike protein (which is toxic) was able to travel through the entire body—including across the highly-sensitive, blood-brain barrier.

The highest concentration of these spike proteins was actually found in the ovaries.

Perhaps this explains why in Pfizer’s own study (see page 67) they acknowledged there is a risk for pregnant women (via “inhalation and skin contact”) if exposed to someone who has had the vaccine.

Might that explain the reports of menstrualfertility and miscarriage issues in women?

THIRD, these jabs also contain the instructions to turn your cells into spike-protein factories.

Not only is the spike-protein what opens the cell wall to allow the virus inside, these spiky bits (whether from covid or from the jab) cause your cells to begin manufacturing a protein that can cause blood platelets to stick together—hello blood clots.

Do you see the obvious problem with these shots not staying in your arm—i.e. escaping capture by the immune system and replicating all over the body?

With the right trigger, cells all over an injected person’s body might not only simultaneously become a spike-protein factory that thickens the blood, but can also cause the immune system to start attacking any cells that make the spike protein.

Hello potential micro clots (found on a D-Dimer test) as well as potential auto-immunity.

Side note: As I detailed in 18 reasons post, science already knew about this phenomenon (of body-wide inflammation) from all the animal studies in the previous 20 years of attempts to make coronavirus vaccines.

Those experiments ended with body-wide inflammation that overwhelmed the test animals.

Should we be surprised then that in the first autopsy (of a human who died after receiving the jab), this same phenomenon is exactly what was found.

Given this was a known potential side-effect, where is the “spare-no-expense” money for doing as many autopsies as necessary to confirm if this is what’s happening for those who die after being injected?

Why is it left to private, brave pathologists like this one in Germany and this one in Idaho, or this one in Michigan (who risk their careers) to do the autopsies and report their (troubling) findings.

Can you see now why Geert Vanden Bossche, and over 12,000 other doctors and scientists signed this petition to stop the jab program, and over 59,000 signed this one?

If all these doctors are willing to buck the system, maybe it’s because they are seeing…


It would be one thing if these jabs were just a big, ineffective dud, but unfortunately that’s not what we’re dealing with.

As you might imagine, given the mechanisms mentioned above, these jabs are, by orders of magnitude, the most harmful products ever to be labeled a vaccine.

In fact, it should give anyone pause that all vaccines injuries in the last 30 years combined don’t equal the carnage we’ve seen in 2021 alone.

This graph says it all…

But wait you (might) protest, aren’t those numbers skewed because no other vaccine has been used this widely?

Good question.

The answer is no.

Here’s an adjusted graph to account for that objection.

No matter what way you may want to pivot the data, the graph stubbornly looks the same.

This would explain why the covid jab has killed more active-duty military than covid has.

This would explain why funeral-home directors (like this brave one) are reporting an excessive amount of mortality (business) from families whose loved ones have taken the jab.

In short, we’re vastly over-counting covid cases and deaths, and vastly, intentionally, dismissively, undercounting death and adverse reactions.

What am I talking about?

Ready for another doozy?


For context of how egregious this is, in 1976 the US pulled the plug on the rushed H1N1 vaccine after a few-dozen reported deaths.

A few dozen.

How many more deaths do we need to see before we end this jab program?

And it’s not just the death counts that are being ignored, it’s also…


Of the countless examples I could use for this one, I’ll stick with three.

FIRST, check out this website for Vax Long Haulers.

This not a website of people who are anti-vaccine.

It’s a site of people abandon by the medical establishment who just “want to be heard.”

With over 800,000 adverse events reported to VAERS, this sad, “six-degrees-of-Kevin-Bacon,” means that if you don’t yet know someone injured, sickened, or killed by these jabs (like I do), you likely will soon.

Yet, in a telling example of cognitive dissonance, you likely also know (or will know) people (including medical professionals) dismissive of verified, debilitating adverse reactions because that would either be too uncomfortable to contemplate, or they never thought to correlate the obvious.

If you’re in favor of these shots, please help me understand why we should be trusting of efficacy and dismissive of harm when the products are still in clinical trials?

That seems like the opposite of a reasonable approach.

SECOND, some want to argue that the VAERS database is simply reporting correlated cases, not confirmed injuries or deaths.

While that’s not entirely true (it takes time to confirm them all), let’s just assume it was:


We had $4B+ dollars spend on promoting the vaccines—never mind the cost to create them.

Where’s the spare-no-expense mentality for an effective tracking system?

Why did OSHA quietly tell businesses (who require their employees to get the jab) that OSHA will not enforce the law that requires companies to report adverse reactions to the jab?

Think about it…we are bombarded with headlines about cases and death, but we willfully turn a blind eye to all information about harm from the jabs?


THIRD, perhaps nothing typifies this flagrant disregard for safety more than the ridiculous, unconscionable use of these jabs for children.

In case you like lists, here are 10 red flags that reveal the FDA’s shady and “preposterous junk science” used in the approval for kids.

Here’s the short version:

Children incur a higher risk of injuries and death from the vaccines than from covid.

For brevity, I’ll stick with the easiest example of a flashing-red-light-safety-signal among children, myocarditis—i.e. swelling of the heart that produces permanent heart damage and sometimes death.

That’s not something healthy adolescents randomly experience.


Check out the expected vs. observed (in red) incidence of myocarditis after the covid injections.

Look closer and you’ll note this data collection stops at the end of Day 6!

Who knows how many injuries go unreported because they showed up outside one week?

It’s info like this that caused Sweden, Denmark, and Iceland to pause Moderna’s shot.

Yet, the FDA just approved the shot for kids age 5-11?

Seriously…who is following the science and who is not?

One would think if the US government wanted to build confidence in these injections (and the entire vaccine program) they would have at least withdrawn the shots for children.

Instead, despite black-and-white evidence of more harm than benefit, the CDC blatantly says “the potential benefits outweigh the risks.

According to what data CDC?

Are you blatantly lying, incompetent, or both?


If you need further evidence of an agenda, look no further than…


If you were trying to take comfort in the jab’s safety because of the “full-approval” status, brace yourself.

This may be the ugliest black-eye the FDA has ever had.

For starters, there is no fully-approved covid jab available anywhere in the world.

Wait, what?

Yeah, the approved “Comirnaty” shot won’t be available until 2023 or 2024.

Wait, but isn’t the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) jab the same as the approved jab?


They’re the same…but different (see footnote 8 on page 2).

How different?

We don’t know.

Even US Senators can’t get the FDA to answer that question.


Good, I think that’s the point.

Pay no attention to that man behind the curtain, just get your darn (outdated) shot already!

Come on…surely, there must be pages and pages of publicly-available data behind the approval.


The FDA is currently being taken to court because they broke the law and won’t show the data they relied upon to approve the shot.

You can’t make this stuff up.

If you care to wade through what seems to be intentionally-confusing semantics, read this.

I’d love to believe in these jabs, but someone please explain to me:

  1. How the heck does Pfizer know what strain of covid might be around two or more years from now that they can already have a fully-approved shot ready?
  2. Why Pfizer redacted 22% of the ingredients (see pages 6 and following) in their new “approved” vaccine and the FDA had to be FOIA-ed to make that ingredient public.
  3. Why Pfizer hid from the public that they used aborted fetal cells in the production of their vaccines and we only found that out because of a Pfizer whistleblower.
  4. Why, in approving the shot, did the FDA skip public comments and the regular VRBPAC meeting—you know that supposedly-third-party, oversight, review-board that weighs in on full approval.

Meh…that’s too much red tape for something we want to forcibly inject into everyone.

So much for the scientific, transparency pledge the FDA told us about.

Informed consent? Ha! 

Foxes guarding the hen house?

Help me out, I don’t know any other way to see this.

It appears the full-approval was simply a ruse to give cover for mandates…and of course allow Pfizer go through the backstock of all the expiring vials that will go to waste without coercion.

Oh, but it gets worse…


Then there’s this.

Instead of skipping another advisory-council meeting to review the risk/benefit of approving boosters (a third shot of the same dud), the ACIP committee did meet this time.

After a full-day, open-for-public-comment period, and after hearing doctor after doctor say things like this, they overwhelmingly (16-2) voted to not approve the booster shot. Yet, leave it to absent-minded Joe Biden to say afterward that the booster program is going forward “as planned” (um…serious question here, Joe…planned by who?).

What was Joe talking about?

Shortly after the 16-2 vote, his CDC director overruled the FDA advisory committee (ACIP) and approved the booster shot for “those at high risk, and the elderly.”

Is it just me, or is “risky underlying health problems” a pathologically-vague category. 

“Yeah, we’re um, following the science and, and it, it, basically says, uh whoever thinks they need a booster can get one.”

Cool…love the hard science, CDC.

Never mind the boosters are failing in Israel, or that the European Union and the W.H.O. both recommended against boosters, I’m sure North American humans are different.

Do you see what’s happening here?



What could possibly go wrong?

It is sheer coincidence that two, top FDA officials resigned after the booster debacle?

After reading this article, it sure doesn’t seem like coincidence.

Maybe there are people who have a conscience still working at the top of the FDA.

Maybe not?

My concern is…who are we left with after these resignations?

Tony Fauci’s henchmen?

Given the obvious failure of the jab, you’d think the medical establishment would at least be open to any and all treatments that might prove promising.

You’d be wrong.


Remember a few months ago when the media couldn’t stop talking about how bad covid was in India, and how we all needed to look to them as reason to take the jab?

Have you noticed they aren’t talking about India anymore?

Curious as to why?

It’s because India embraced Ivermectin and wiped out covid.

The same thing happened in Japan and throughout several countries in Africa.

Why aren’t we celebrating (and replicating) that wonderful success?  

Why are we being told that Ivermectin (a drug used in humans for decades, proven safe in over 63 trials, a drug that even won a Nobel prize), is no longer safe—it’s now a risky “horse de-wormer”?