COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Are Gene Therapy

  • mRNA “vaccines” created by Moderna and Pfizer are gene therapies. They fulfill all the definitions of gene therapy and none of the definitions for a vaccine. This matters, as you cannot mandate a gene therapy against COVID-19 any more than you can force entire populations to undergo gene therapy for a cancer they do not have and may never be at risk for
  • mRNA contain genetic instructions for making various proteins. mRNA “vaccines” deliver a synthetic version of mRNA into your cells that carry the instruction to produce the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, the antigen, that then activates your immune system to produce antibodies
  • The only one benefiting from an mRNA “vaccine” is the vaccinated individual, since all they are designed to do is lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein. Since you’re the only one who will reap a benefit, it makes no sense to demand you accept the risks of the therapy “for the greater good” of your community
  • Since mRNA “vaccines” do not meet the medical and/or legal definition of a vaccine, marketing them as such is a deceptive practice that violates the law that governs advertising of medical practices
  • SARS-CoV-2 has not even been proven to be the cause of COVID-19. So, a gene therapy that instructs your body to produce a SARS-CoV-2 antigen — the viral spike protein — cannot be said to be preventive against COVID-19, as the two have not been shown to be causally linked

As calls for mandatory COVID-19 vaccination grow around the world, it’s becoming ever more crucial to understand what these injections actually are. The mRNA “vaccines” created by Moderna and Pfizer are in fact gene therapies. 

 Interestingly enough, mainstream media, fact checkers and various industry front groups insist the gene therapy claim is bogus, even though every single detail about the vaccines shouts otherwise. Why are they spreading this disinformation? Why do they not want you to know what these injections actually are? 

mRNA ‘Vaccines’ Fulfill None of the Criteria for a Vaccine 

To start, let’s take a look at some basic definitions of words. According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, a vaccine is:1

  • “A product that stimulates a person’s immune system to produce immunity to a specific disease, protecting the person from that disease.” 

Immunity, in turn, is defined as: 

  • “Protection from an infectious disease,” meaning that “If you are immune to a disease, you can be exposed to it without becoming infected.”

That’s the medical definition. The legal definition, in the few cases where it has been detailed, is equally unequivocal: 

  • Iowa code2 — “Vaccine means a specially prepared antigen administered to a person for the purpose of providing immunity.” 
  • Washington state code3,4 — “Vaccine means a preparation of a killed or attenuated living microorganism, or fraction thereof …” The statute also specifies that a vaccine “upon immunization stimulates immunity that protects us against disease …” 

These definitions, both medical and legal, present problems for mRNA “vaccines,” since:

  • mRNA injections do not impart immunity. Moderna and Pfizer both admit that their clinical trials aren’t even looking at immunity. As such they do not fulfill the medical and/or legal definition of a vaccine. 
  • They do not inhibit transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 infection. As such they do not fulfill the medical and/or legal definition of a vaccine. 
Dictionaries Attempt to Rewrite Medical Terms

We should not be fooled by attempts to condition the public to accept redefined terms. As of February 2019, Merriam-Webster defined5 “vaccine” as “a preparation of killed microorganisms, living attenuated organisms, or living fully virulent organisms that is administered to produce or artificially increase immunity to a particular disease.” By February 26, 2021, they had updated the definition of “vaccine” to:6

“A preparation that is administered (as by injection) to stimulate the body’s immune response against a specific infectious disease:

a: an antigenic preparation of a typically inactivated or attenuated … pathogenic agent (such as a bacterium or virus) or one of its components or products (such as a protein or toxin)

b: a preparation of genetic material (such as a strand of synthesized messenger RNA) that is used by the cells of the body to produce an antigenic substance (such as a fragment of virus spike protein)”

Let’s be clear. Merriam-Webster does not dictate medical terminology. It can be used, however, to confuse people. For now, all medical dictionaries still show the traditional definition of vaccine,7 as Merriam-Webster did up until this year. That said, I would not be surprised if changes are made there as well, eventually, if the misrepresentation of COVID-19 mRNA vaccines is allowed to stand.

Click here to learn more
mRNA Therapy Doesn’t Satisfy Public Health Measure Directive

There’s also the issue of whether a gene therapy can be mandated, and this may hinge on it being accepted as a vaccine. The 1905 Supreme Court ruling in Jacobson v. Massachusetts8 essentially established that collective benefit supersedes individual benefit. 

Since mRNA therapies do not render the immunized person immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective benefit that supersedes individual risk, and therefore cannot be mandated. 

Put another way, the ruling argues (although legal experts diverge on some of the finer details of its interpretation) that it’s acceptable for some individuals to be harmed by a public health directive as long as it benefits the collective. However, if vaccination is a public health measure meant to protect and benefit the collective, then it would need to accomplish two things:

  1. Ensure that the vaccinated person is rendered immune from the disease.
  2. Inhibit transmission of the disease from the vaccinated person to other individuals.

We’re now back to the original problem that mRNA therapies for COVID-19 do not accomplish either of these things. Since these gene therapies do not render the person immune, and do not inhibit transmission of the virus, they cannot qualify as a public health measure capable of providing collective benefit that supersedes individual risk. 

On the contrary, the only one benefiting from an mRNA “vaccine” is the individual receiving the gene therapy, since all they are designed to do is lessen clinical symptoms associated with the S-1 spike protein. 

In other words, they won’t keep you from getting sick with SARS-CoV-2; they are only supposed to lessen your infection symptoms if or when you do get infected. So, getting vaccinated protects no one but yourself. Since you’re the only one who will reap a benefit (less severe COVID-19 symptoms upon infection), the justification to accept the risks of the therapy “for the greater good” of your community is blatantly irrational.

Marketing mRNA Therapy as Vaccine Violates Federal Law

Since mRNA “vaccines” do not meet the medical and/or legal definition of a vaccine, referring to them as vaccines, and marketing them as such, is a deceptive practice that violates9 15 U.S. Code Section 41 of the Federal Trade Commission Act,10 the law that governs advertising of medical practices. 

The lack of completed human trials also puts these mRNA products at odds with 15 U.S. Code Section 41. Per this law,11,12 it is unlawful to advertise “that a product or service can prevent, treat, or cure human disease unless you possess competent and reliable scientific evidence, including, when appropriate, well-controlled human clinical studies, substantiating that the claims are true at the time they are made.” 

Here’s the problem: The primary end point in the COVID-19 “vaccine” trials is not an actual vaccine trial end point because, again, vaccine trial end points have to do with immunity and transmission reduction. Neither of those was measured. 

What’s more, key secondary end points in Moderna’s trial include prevention of severe COVID-19 disease (defined as need for hospitalization) and prevention of infection by SARS-CoV-2, regardless of symptoms.13,14 However, Moderna did not actually measure rate of infection, stating that it was too “impractical” to do so. 

That means there’s no evidence of this gene therapy having an impact on infection, for better or worse. And, if you have no evidence, you cannot fulfill the U.S. Code requirement that states you must have “competent and reliable scientific evidence … substantiating that the claims are true.”

Making matters worse, both Pfizer and Moderna are now eliminating their control groups by offering the real vaccine to any and all placebo recipients who want it.15 The studies are supposed to go on for a full two years, but by eliminating the control group, determining effectiveness and risks is going to be near impossible.

17 thoughts on “COVID-19 ‘Vaccines’ Are Gene Therapy

  1. Everything I have read tells me that vaccinated people are going to die within approximately 3 years from what the fake vaccine does to them. I have listened to so very intelligent virologists, physicians, etc. who are being silenced at giving this information out. Everything else being said is from the main news media hyping the fact that everyone should get the so called vaccine. I have family members who have been coerced into getting this so called shot. Does anyone have anything that would stop what it will do to their bodies or do we just face the fact that our family members who were deceived are going to die from what has been injected into their bodies? My son and daughter in law got the shots and they live with my husband and I who are elderly (67 and 69) and susceptible to things and I am sure this shot would damage us further. They are talking of a shedding that I don’t understand will this so called shedding harm us as much as having gotten the shot ourselves? I work at a hospital that may decide to make it mandatory forcing me to retire when I can’t afford to, but I have made the decision to not get this thing even if it means I have to retire to prevent it.

    Liked by 3 people

  2. What I can’t understand is why people are not researching. I am treated like a piranha at work because to work in a hospital setting without the shot is unheard of. What happens when all the caregivers start dying. We had a 40 year old nurse die with aneurysm after the shots. We have had several doctors, healthy doctors die days and weeks after the shot, but no they just died suddenly with no explanation. No correlating their deaths with the shots that would be against policy. I have autoimmune patients on immune therapy who suddenly after being on the therapy for years are having major reactions to the therapy everyone of them just got the shots, but nope its not the shot it is the immune therapy that is no longer working. No correlation with the shots … Again. It somehow happens after they have gotten them but it is not the reason for the reactions. I feel bad for all of them.
    They are already sick and their bodies compromised and now who knows what will happen if that therapy now fails them because of the shot.

    Liked by 2 people

  3. If people try to research using Google’s search engine, those results are scrubbed of anything faintly suggesting less than 100% compliance. You have to use a different search engine. I cannot explain how trusting people are. It’s faith-based, like their whole world would implode if they found out…
    Typical conversation: “I’m so excited! I just got my vaccination.”
    “What’s so great about it?”
    “Are you Anti-VAX???”
    “It’s not a vaccine. It’s experimental gene-therapy.”
    “Sure. Whatever.”
    “If you knew half of what is going on, it would blow your mind.”
    “I don’t want to know.”

    Liked by 2 people

  4. That is the problem the first thing they run to is google. The nurse I work with and I have done so much back research and all we get is flack about what we say. “Where are you getting your information off the dark web?” I am 67 years old do you think I travel on the dark web? No I try to use my brain.” I was never an anti vaxxer. I just did what the Dr. said but now I can’t do that anymore. I don’t feel like they have my best interest at stake. Someone told us that where we work is owned by the great cabal. I can see it, and it is sad. 29 years I have worked for this place thinking it was the best place, healing people taking care of people and now my eyes are open to the fact that they have been controlled by the pharmaceutical companies all this time. They teach that drugs are the cure and they are actually the curse. One drug leads to needing another drug, to another until your hooked. How do you stop? The hospitals and doctors started the opioid problem and now suddenly oh guess what it’s harmful and we have to cut you off, so now where do they go? To the streets to get whatever they can to eliminate the pain. I am saddened by this whole thing and wish I could wake up tomorrow and it would be all gone. I know it won’t be though it has only just begun. I listened to Dr. Tenpenny and what she has revealed is frightening. It will be like where do we go when the real pandemic starts. This was just the trial run. Divide and conquer is what I am seeing.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. I’m sad because family members who had agreed with me on not getting these nonsensical treatments have changed course. My entire family has been vaccinated with Moderna, and even my spouse has begun considering being vaccinated just to avoid issues at work. I can’t control anyone. So if my spouse decides to go ahead with it, I will just have to stand by and watch and hope that in three years no strange cancer develops in my spouse OR me from the shedding. PS – If the jabs shed, why does everyone need to get it? Isn’t the ‘immunity’ transferred? Or just the negative effects are transferred? I’ve said it from summer of 2019: Something weird is going on. That was my first thought when we began to hear about all the vaping sickness. Suspicious, and now even more sounds like ‘Covid.’ Very fishy and deeper than what we know. I am 100% convinced this has all been orchestrated and Fauci is the crookedest person I’ve ever seen. I just don’t understand why more people aren’t questioning the whole thing. I am the only person I know, personally, who does research on all aspects of this pandemic. Weird.

    Liked by 4 people

  6. You are definitely not the only one researching Sarah. The nurse I work with and I have been researching for well over a year now. Even before the shots came out. The masks are a joke and yet we are told to wear them every day. They do nothing and if it is not the governments objective it is silenced. We have taken ridicule and for what? All a big fat lie by the biggest liar of them all Fauci. He is in this planned pandemic from way before it even hit along with Bill Gates and his crew. They have patents on these vaccines, they are raking in money from around the world in an effort to depopulate it. I am sad that they seem to be winning. I have struggled too as family members have caved in. I have some staunch family that are sticking to their guns but only because my nurse friend and I have been vigilant in giving them the true information. I cry when I see a family member cave though. We are also seeing more and more cases of things happening to our patients as they get these shots. Problem is we can speculate all we want but there are such a variety of symptoms that none can be pinned on the vaccine. Every reaction we are told ” Oh it was just a coincidence.” Especially those who have autoimmune issues. We have to stand by and not say a word of discouragement. I am not so good at the standing by part. If they ask my opinion I tell them what I think, but I also have to tell them it is a decision they have to make. I cannot make it for them. It breaks my heart. Stand strong you are not alone in this fight… I believe that the people promoting this are getting major paybacks from the pharmaceutical companies who are using the WORLD as a Guinea pigs for what will be a major genocide. I think it is funny how Dr. Mikovits’s was pegged to be a liar and a conspiracy theorist when she exposed the deceit of Fauci, Not so funny now that her words of his true agenda is coming out and being proved as truth. She went to prison because of this man’s lies. He needs to go to prison…
    They are trying to tell us that the actual antibodies from this just disappear and we need the shot even if we have had Covid. Lies, it is all lies and they will be found out, tragically too late for a lot of people who ran to get this shot…

    Liked by 2 people

  7. Employers telling employees there will be consequences if they don’t get the shot! That is illegal. but does anyone do anything about that in the lawsuits?

    Liked by 1 person

  8. When and where was there a “vaping” sickness , please? I am in England so far removed from you! I was surprised that Covid 19 was only really discusssed Feb/March when I was convinced I’d come down with it much earlier, in Dec 2019. And I was living in a small town in Hertfordshire at the time! If it was around in 2019, it put in to question the assumption that it was very deadly and there wasn’t already substantial community immunity. Therefore, lockdowns not best policy.

    Liked by 1 person

  9. Hi there good on you, I agree risk from the “vaccine” are worse than building an immunity to the disease.

    you can increase vitamin D a good vegetable based one 10000uli and if you do get something bump it up to 50000uli a good sodium ascorbate buffered vitamin C in similar regular doses is good and again higher doses if you get something, taking a goo zinc supplement and if you feel your exposed an iodine supplement to. I think hydrochlorideoxy?(SP) you know the one that was banned sounds really good and would be effective if you can get it. eat good whole foods, and take some minerals, I don’t think any of these have any interactions with other meds though do check it out.
    All the best you still have quite high levels of surviving covid



    What does the world know about “graphene oxide”? This substance was recently revealed by Spanish scientists to be the MAIN INGREDIENT in the pfizer jab. They also found this substance in masks and in the swabs that are used for the pcr “covid test”.
    Apparently there is hope for the injected if they dose up on antioxidants “glutathione does is counteract free radicals and oxidants, all the toxins that can enter the body.”

    Here is the the(English) transcript of the video (in Spanish) of Ricardo Delgado.

    Liked by 1 person

  11. I knew something was wrong when I went to pull the definition of vaccine and all of sudden it sounded like it was trying to cover what the mRNA “vaccine” is. Thank you for this article


  12. The World/Earth is in danger of CO2(carbon dioxide), poisoning / pollution.
    So, wear your mask and poison yourself with your own CO2 !!
    And we are to believe that they have our health at heart?


Comments are closed.